DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the effect of managers' innovation orientation, technological innovation capability and organizational capability on corporate innovation behavior

중소기업의 전략적지향성, 기술혁신역량, 조직역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Sang-Hwa (Dept. of cruise & tourism, DaeKyeung University)
  • 김상화 (대경대학교 호텔크루즈서비스학부)
  • Received : 2022.08.30
  • Accepted : 2022.09.09
  • Published : 2022.09.30

Abstract

Although Companies are forming cooperation and networks with various companies such as technology and R&D, but it is urgently necessary to secure multiple competencies of companies that can effectively adapt. This study investigated the effects of corporate strategic orientation, technological innovation capability, and organizational capability on corporate performance targeting SMEs located in the Daegu area. The survey was conducted from September 1 to November 30, 2021 for employees of Daegu companies, and a total of 183 cases were used for the final analysis. Looking at the results of the analysis, as a result of multiple regression analysis on Daegu companies, it was found that the strategic orientation, technological innovation capability, and organizational capability of managers, all independent variables, had a significant positive (+) effect on corporate performance. It can be seen that efforts should be made to improve education and R&D according to various competency bases and innovations because of the large impact on the manager's mind, the company's core technical competency, and the company's organizational performance. This study aimed to understand the importance of corporate strategic orientation, technological innovation capability, and organizational capability on corporate performance targeting relevant SMEs that can have a significant impact on national and regional economies.

기업은 기술력과 연구개발 등 다양한 기업들과 협력 및 네트워크를 형성하고 있지만, 효과적으로 적응 할 수 있는 기업의 다수 역량 확보가 절실하게 필요하다. 본 연구는 대구 지역에 위치한 중소기업들을 대상으로 기업의 전략적지향성, 기술혁신역량, 조직역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향을 규명하였다. 설문조사는 2021년 9월 1일부터 11월30일까지 대구 기업 종사자를 대상으로 진행하였고 최종 분석에 활용된 사례는 총 183명이 활용되었다. 분석결과를 살펴보면 대구 기업들을 대상으로 다중회귀분석을 실시한 결과 독립변수 모두인 경영자의 전략적지향성, 기술혁신역량, 조직역량이 기업성과에 정(+)의 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 경영자의 마인드와 회사의 핵심기술 역량 및 기업의 조직 기업성과에 미치는 영향이 크기에 다양한 역량 기반 및 혁신 따른 교육과 R&D 향상을위해 노력해야한다고 볼 수 있다. 본 연구는 국가 및 지역 경제에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있는 관련 중소기업들을 대상으로 기업의 전략지향성과 기술혁신역량, 조직역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향의 중요성을 이해하고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. [ ] J. S. Kyung(2021). "A Study on Impact of Innovative and Network Competency of Small-Medium Enterprises on Performance". Journal of Industrial Economics and Business 34(2), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2021.4.34.2.363
  2. S. M. Kang(2021) "Analysis of the influence of individual cooperation activities on the innovative performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Daegu: Moderating effect of technological competence" Journal of the Korean Contents Association, 21(4). pp.404-413, 2021.
  3. J. S. Kwon(2012). "Effect of technological innovation on market-oriented information, job satisfaction and organizational commitment", Journal of the Korean Management Association, 25(1): 501-527.
  4. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742
  5. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of marketing, 57(3), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251854
  6. Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research policy, 31(7), 1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
  7. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of "organizational lag". Administrative science quarterly, 392-409.
  8. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344704
  9. Y. S. Choi & U. Lim(2017). Contextual Factors Affecting the Innovation Performance of Manufacturing SMEs in Korea: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability, doi:10.3390/su9071193
  10. M. H. Choi(2014). An empirical analysis of the organizational competences of social enterprises. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Histology, 11(3), 135-157.
  11. Kanter, R. M, "When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations", Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211, 1988.
  12. D. C. Seol & C. W. Park. "A Study on the Factors that Technology Innovation Capability Affects the Knowledge Management Performance of Companies: Focusing on the R&D Project of Government Small and Medium Venture Businesses," Venture Startup Research, 15(4), pp. 193-216, 2020.
  13. R. S. Kaplan & D. P. Norton.(2005). The Balanced Scorecard : Measures that Drive Performance. Boston, Harvard Business School Publishing.
  14. H. S. Han(2020). "The relationship between strategic orientation, technological cooperation, technological innovation capability, and innovation performance of SMEs: verification of the mediating effect of self-efficacy". Wonkwang University Graduate School of Business Administration.
  15. S. D Lee(2018), "The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation of CEOs of Small and Medium Enterprises on Technology Innovation and Management Performance", Kyungsung University Graduate School, Ph.D. thesis.
  16. U. Lichtenthaler(2016). Toward an Innovation based Perspective on Company Performance. Management Decision, 54(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-0161
  17. B. J. Choi, D. S. Park, S. H. Jung, Y. G. Lee, "Networks, Organizational Capabilities and Corporate Performance of Venture Businesses," Journal of the Korean Business Association, 26(12), 3115-3146. 2013.
  18. G. Y. Kong, "The Effects of Managerial Characteristics and Technology Management Activities on Innovation Performance and Management Performance: Focusing on Korean Shipbuilding Equipment Companies", Pusan National University Graduate School: Technology Business Policy Major, Ph.D. thesis, 2014.
  19. Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). A resource-based view of innovativeness in small firms. Technology analysis & Strategic management, 12(2), 263- 281. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698465
  20. Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic management journal, 30(8), 909-920. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.764
  21. Herron, L., & Robinson Jr, R. B. (1993). A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 8(3), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90032-Z
  22. C. W. Lee. "Organizational Culture of Korean Companies: Organizational Cultural Characteristics and Changes in Shared Value DNA, Examination of Korea's Growth Engine", January 1, 2014.
  23. S. H. Lee, T. J. Jo, "The Relationship between Job Crafting and Innovation Behavior of Workers: A Moderated Mediating Effect of Career Commitment and Social Disturbance," Lifelong Education and HRD Research, 16(2), pp.49-81, 2020. https://doi.org/10.35637/klehrd.2020.16.1.003
  24. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  25. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6
  26. J. H. Kwon & S. H. Kim(2019) An exploratory study on the concept and innovation orientation of socially innovative enterprises. Innovative Enterprise Research, 4(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.37297/IER.2019.10.4.2.73
  27. J. K. Shinm(2019) R&D and technological innovation of SMEs: the role of strategy and organizational culture. Management Research, 22(2), 393-424.
  28. Dougherty, D. E. B. O. R. A. H., & Cohen, M. (1995). Product innovation in mature firms. Redesigning the firm, 87-115.
  29. Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of management studies, 49(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00976.x
  30. Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, A. K. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research policy, 40(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013
  31. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
  32. Sheth, J. N., & Sharma, A. (2008). The impact of the product to service shift in industrial markets and the evolution of the sales organization. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.010
  33. S. J. Lee & K. H. Park. (2021). "The effect of open innovation capacity and organizational capacity of SMEs on corporate performance". Digital Convergence Research, 19(11), 235-246.
  34. D. J. Yoon & D. Y. Jung(2014). "A study on the effect of a company's customer orientation and technological innovation orientation on business performance: Focusing on the mediation between core resource holding capacity and process efficiency". Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 9(1), 59-84.
  35. C. H. Lee & S. W. Kim & D. M. Lee(2020). The effect of absorption capacity of SMEs on R&D capacity and technology commercialization capacity. Journal of the Korean Society of Management Engineering, 25(4), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.35373/KMES.25.4.9
  36. H. S. Im & H. J. Im. (2013). A Study on Corporate Innovation Success Factors, Innovation and Management Performance: For POSCO Group Companies," Productivity Review (formerly Productivity Research), 27(4), pp 233-258, 2013.
  37. S. M. Park(2012). After the announcement of measures for mid-sized companies, supplementary and additional tasks were drawn. Ministry of Knowledge Economy service.