DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on conceptual recognition of Korean Medicine doctor for usefulness of Artificial Intelligence to Korean Medicine department and medical application

한의사의 진료분야와 의료 적용분야의 AI 도입과 유용도에 대한 인식조사 연구

  • Kyung-Yul Mok (Department of Health & Medical Administration, Doowon University of Technology)
  • 목경열 (두원공과대학교 보건의료행정과)
  • Received : 2022.09.21
  • Accepted : 2022.12.09
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

The online questionnaire platform was conducted with Korean medicine doctors to analyses the recognition of applicability of artificial intelligence(AI) to the field of application and department of Korean medicine. Most of all respondents did not have a chance to participate academic experience or research experience related to AI, but had a high willingness to participate in further learning and research. The level of AI understanding was supervised learning When AI is introduced to Korean medicine, the mean predicted usefulness scores to each application field for research and development of oriental medicine(74.60 points) and social policy establishment(73.68 points) are significantly higher than other of Korean medicine field of application, while those of Sasang constitutional department(66.61 points) and Korean medicine rehabilitation(65.91 points) were evaluated higher than other fields of treatment of Korean medicine. Respondents judged that the introduction of AI could be realistically useful in relatively formal fields of Korean medicine, while it would be difficult in non-formal fields.

본 연구는 온라인 설문 플랫폼을 이용하여 한의사를 대상으로 인공지능(artificial intelligence, AI)의 한의학의 진료과목 및 적용분야에 대한 적용가능성 및 그 인식을 분석하였다. 응답자들은 대부분 AI와 관련된 학문적 경험이나 연구 경험에 참여할 기회가 없었지만 향후 학습 및 연구에 참여할 의향이 높았다. AI에 대한 이해도는 대부분 지도학습(supervised learning) 수준으로 이해하고 있었다. AI가 한의학에 도입되었을 때 한약 연구개발(74.60점), 사회정책수립(73.68점)은 한의학 적용분야에 대한 평균 예측 유용도 점수가 적용분야에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 사상체질과(66.61점)와 한방재활의학과(65.91점)는 다른 한의학 진료분야보다 높은 평가를 받았다. 응답자들은 비교적 정형적인 분야에서는 AI의 도입이 현실적으로 유용할 수 있는 반면, 비정형적인 분야에서는 어려울 것이라고 판단했다.

Keywords

References

  1. So Dae-Sup. 'Status of Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry Area'. Korean Industrial Chemistry NEWS, vol.25, no.5, pp.36-46, 2022.
  2. Seo Hyung-Jun, 'A Preliminary Discussion on Policy Decision Making of AI in The Fourth Industrial Revolution', Information Policy, vol.26, issue 3, pp.3-35, 2019.
  3. Waymel Q, Badr S, Demondion X, Cotten A, and Jacques T, 'Impact of the rise of artificial intelligence in radiology: what do radiologists think?', Diagnostics and Interventional Imaging, vol.100, no.6, pp.327-336, 2019.
  4. Oh S, Kim JH, Choi SW, Lee HJ, Hong J and Kwon SH, 'Physician confidence in artificial intelligence: an online mobile survey'. J Med Internet Res, vol.21, no.3, e12422, 2019.
  5. Pinto Dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, Chon SH, Staab W and Kleinert R, 'Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey', Eur Radiol, vol.29, no.4, pp.1640-1646, 2019.
  6. Collado-Mesa F, Alvarez E and Arheart K, 'The role of artificial intelligence in diagnostic radiology: a survey at a single radiology residency training program', J Am Coll Radiol, vol.15, no.12, pp.1753-1757, 2018.
  7. Lee Hyeonbin, Park Seong Ho, Kim Cherry, Kim Seungkwan and Cha Jaehyung, 'Survey of the knowledge of korean radiology residents on medical artificial intelligence', Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, vol.81, no.6, pp.1397-1411, 2020.
  8. Chi Gyoo-Yong, 'Concept of Science and Indices of Scientification in the Task of 'Scientification of Korean Medicine', Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine, vol.33, issue 6, pp.303-310, 2019.
  9. Park Mu-sun, Hwang Min-Woo, Lee Jeong-yun, Kim Chang-Eop, and Kwon Young-Kyu, 'Research on the Evaluation and Utilization of Constitutional Diagnosis by Korean Doctors using AI-based Evaluation Tool', Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine, vol.36, no.2, pp.73-78, 2022.