지능정보연구 (Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems)

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.237-258
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2288-4866(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4882(eISSN)
한국지능정보시스템학회 (Korea Intelligent Information System Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정부창업지원 프로그램 참여에 따른 ICT 기업 프로파일링과 성과창출 메커니즘

ICT Company Profiling Analysis and the Mechanism for Performance Creation Depending on the Type of Government Start-up Support Program

  • 하상집 (국민대학교 비즈니스IT전문대학원) ;
  • 박도형 (국민대학교 비즈니스IT전문대학원/경영정보학부)
  • Ha, Sangjip (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University) ;
  • Park, Do-Hyung (Graduate School of Business IT/School of Management Information Systems, Kookmin University)
  • 투고 : 2022.09.15
  • 심사 : 2022.09.20
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국내 ICT 산업은 세계 시장 환경이 변화함에 따라, 세계에 미치는 영향력이 점차 커지고 있다. 이 산업은 국가 경제에 기술적, 사회적 측면에서 중요한 원동력으로 여겨지고 있다. 특히 ICT 산업 내 중소기업은 다양성 추구, 기술 발전 및 고용 창출 측면에서 국내 경제 발전의 반드시 필요한 주체로서 여겨지고 있다. 하지만 대기업이나 중견 기업에 비해 작은 규모이기 때문에, 불완전하고 급변하는 환경 속에서 중소기업이 차별화된 전략을 가지고 살아 남기 어려운 상황에 직면해 있다. 그래서 중소기업은 자신이 가진 역량을 향상시키기 위해서 많은 노력을 해야 하며, 정부도 이들이 지속적으로 경쟁력을 갖추도록 기업 내부자원에 맞는 바람직한 도움을 제공해 줄 필요성이 있다. 본 연구는 정부지원 프로그램에 참여하고 있는 ICT 중소기업의 유형을 분류하고, 각각의 유형별로 기업들이 가지고 있는 자원들과 성과창출 간의 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 자료로는 과학기술정보통신부에서 매년 실시하고 있는 ICT 중소기업 실태조사의 데이터를 사용하였다. 이를 위해, 본 연구는 첫번째 단계에서 ICT 중소기업들을 정부지원 프로그램 경험에 따라 공통의 요소를 기반으로 군집화 하였다. 세 개의 군집이 의미 있게 분류되었으며, 각각의 군집은 '적극적 참여형,' '초기 지원형,' '홀로서기형'으로 명명하였다. 두번째 단계로, 본 연구는 각 군집에 대해 프로파일링 분석을 통해 각 군집의 특성을 비교하였다. 본 연구가 수행한 세번째 단계는 군집별로 R&D 성과창출 메커니즘을 회귀분석을 통해 알아보았는데, 각 군집별로 서로 상이한 요인들이 성과창출에 영향을 주었고, 그 영향력의 크기도 서로 달랐다. 구체적으로, "적극적 참여형"은 "현재 보유 인력", "기술경쟁력", "전년도 R&D 투자액"이 "R&D 성과창출"에 중요한 요인들로 밝혀졌다. "초기 지원형"은 "연구개발전담조직 보유 여부", "전년도 R&D 투자액", "대기업 매출 비중", "대기업 납품 벤더 비중"이 성과에 기여하는 것으로 파악되었다. 마지막으로 "홀로서기형"의 경우, "현재 보유 인력"과 더불어 "미래 충원 계획", "기술경쟁력", "R&D 투자액", "대기업 매출 비중", "해외매출 비중"이 유의한 관계를 보여주었다. 본 연구는 정부의 창업프로그램 참여 방식에 따라, 향후 중소기업을 지원할 때, 어떤 전략을 수립해야 하는지를 보여준다는 정책적 시사점을 가지며, 구체적으로 어떤 지원을 제공해야 하는지에 대한 가이드를 제공한다는 실무적 시사점을 가진다.

As the global market environment changes, the domestic ICT industry has a growing influence on the world economy. This industry is regarded as an important driving force in the national economy from a technological and social point of view. In particular, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the ICT industry are regarded as essential actors of domestic economic development in terms of company diversity, technology development and job creation. However, since it is small compared to large-sized enterprises, it is difficult for SMEs to survive with a differentiated strategy in an incomplete and rapidly changing environment. Therefore, SMEs must make a lot of efforts to improve their own capabilities, and the government needs to provide the desirable help suitable for corporate internal resources so that they can continue to be competitive. This study classifies the types of ICT SMEs participating in government support programs, and analyzes the relationship between resources and performance creation of each type. The data from the "ICT Small and Medium Enterprises Survey" conducted annually by the Ministry of Science and ICT was used. In the first stage, ICT SMEs were clustered based on common factors according to their experiences with government support programs. Three clusters were meaningfully classified, and each cluster was named "active participation type," "initial support type," and "soloist type." As a second step, this study compared the characteristics of each cluster through profiling analysis for each cluster. The third step carried out in this study was to find out the mechanism of R&D performance creation for each cluster through regression analysis. Different factors affected performance creation for each cluster, and the magnitude of the influence was also different. Specifically, for "active participation type", "current manpower", "technology competitiveness", and "R&D investment in the previous year" were found to be important factors in creating R&D performance. "Initial support type" was identified as "whether or not a dedicated R&D organization exists", "R&D investment amount in the previous year", "Ratio of sales to large companies", and "Ratio of vendors supplied to large companies" contributed to the performance. Lastly, in the case of "soloist type", "current workforce" and "future recruitment plan", "technological competitiveness", "R&D investment", "large company sales ratio", and "overseas sales ratio" showed a significant relationship with the performance. This study has practical implications of showing what strategy should be established when supporting SMEs in the future according to the government's participation in the startup program and providing a guide on what kind of support should be provided.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 한국기술혁신학회 추계학술대회에서 발표된 연구를 수정하여 작성한 연구임. 이 논문은 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 2020년 BK21 FOUR(Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research)의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

참고문헌

  1. Adner, R., & Zemsky, P. (2006). A demand based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 27(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.513
  2. An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S. G., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Customer segmentation using online platforms: isolating behavioral and demographic segments for persona creation via aggregated user data. Social network analysis and mining, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-017-0479-5
  3. Barney, J. B. (1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization science, 7(5), 469-469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.469
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  5. Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1993). Improving business and information strategy alignment: Learning from the banking industry. IBM systems journal, 32(1), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.321.0162
  6. Chae, J. S., & Kim, C. J. (2019). The impact of strategic human resource management on management performance through organizational competence. Journal of human resource management research, 23(23), 143-174. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2018.26.1.143
  7. Chang, Y. S., & Kim, J. M. (2007). An empirical study on high-technology innovative SMEs' characteristics and their bottlenecks across the growth stages. IE interfaces, 20(3), 418-426.
  8. Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization science, 7(5), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.477
  9. Goodman-Deane, J., Waller, S., Demin, D., Gonzalez-de-Heredia, A., Bradley, M., and Clarkson, J. (2018). Evaluating inclusivity using quantitative personas, in Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.400
  10. Hunt, S. D., & Davis, D. F. (2012). Grounding supply chain management in resource advantage theory: In defense of a resource based view of the firm. Journal of supply chain management, 48(2), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03266.x
  11. Jun, S. P., Jung, J., & Choi, S. (2016). An empirical study of profiling model for the SMEs with High demand for standards using data mining. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 19(3), 511-544.
  12. Jun, S. P., Choi, S., & Jung, J. (2017). A study on the stereotype of ICT SMEs' R&D: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 20(2), 334-367.
  13. Kim, O., & Lee, S. (2005). A review on the typology of serial killings for the criminal profiling. Korean Journal of social and personality psychology, 19(1), 131~149.
  14. Konstantakis, M., Alexandridis, G., & Caridakis, G. (2020). A personalized heritage-oriented recommender system based on extended cultural tourist typologies. Big data and cognitive computing, 4(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4020012
  15. Lopez Cabrales, A., Valle, R., & Herrero, I. (2006). The contribution of core employees to organizational capabilities and efficiency. Human resource management, 45(1), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20094
  16. Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Wright, P. (1992). A competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal of management, 18(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800106
  17. Lee, J. W., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Reasons of failure according to stages of new venture growth. The Korean small business review, 31(3), 1-17.
  18. Matthews, T., Judge, T., & Whittaker, S.(2012). How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1219-1228.
  19. Marr, B., & Schiuma, G, (2003). Business performance measurement - past, present and future. Management decision, 41(8), 680-687.. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310496198
  20. McGinn, J., & Kotamraju, N. (2008). Data-driven persona development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1521-1524.
  21. Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?. Design studies, 32(5), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003
  22. Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource based views. Strategic management journal, 18(9), 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
  23. Park, W., Park, H. Y., & Yeom, M. B. (2017). The effect on technology innovation performance of private-public R&D cooperation of ICT SMEs: Focused on collaboration with government-funded research institutes. Asia-Pacific journal of business venturing and entrepreneurship, 12(6), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.12.6.201712.139
  24. Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, 1-15.
  25. Salminen, J., Guan, K., Jung, S. G., & Jansen, B. J. (2021). A survey of 15 years of data-driven persona development. International journal of human-computer interaction, 37(18), 1685-1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1908670
  26. Shon, M., & Kim, H. (2020). The effect of the original technology possession and open innovation on the firm efficiency: focusing on Korean ICT SMEs. Innovation studies, 15(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.46251/INNOS.2020.05.15.2.151
  27. Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?. Strategic management journal, 24(8), 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
  28. Tychsen, A., & Canossa, A. (2008). Defining personas in games using metrics. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on future play: Research, play, share, 73-80.
  29. Wang, Y., & Lo, H. P. (2003). Customer focused performance and the dynamic model for competence building and leveraging: A resource based view. Journal of management development, 22(6), 483-526. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710310478486
  30. Won, J., & Lee, K. (2021). Empirical analysis of the influence of ICT SMEs' R&D resources on corporate performance. Information systems review, 23(3), 1-23.
  31. Yoo, I., -j., & Park, D. -H. (2018). A study on empirical model for the prevention and protection of technology leakage through SME profiling analysis. The journal of information systems, 27(1), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2018.27.1.171