The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.262-272
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of surface treatment on shear bond strength of relining material and 3D-printed denture base

  • Park, Se-Jick (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2022.05.08
  • Accepted : 2022.08.22
  • Published : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to analyze the shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material, according to the surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cylindrical specimens were prepared using DENTCA Denture Base II. The experimental groups were divided into 6 (n = 10): no surface treatment (C), Tokuyama Rebase II Normal adhesive (A), sandblasting (P), sandblasting and adhesive (PA), sandblasting and silane (PS), and the Rocatec system (PPS). After bonding the chairside relining material to the center of the specimens in a cylindrical shape, they were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure mode was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. Shear bond strength values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's honest significant difference test was used for post-hoc analysis (P < .05). RESULTS. Group PPS exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than all other groups. Groups P and PA displayed significantly higher bond strengths than the control group. There were no significant differences between groups PS and A compared to the control group. Regarding the failure mode, adhesive failure occurred primarily in groups C and A, and mixed failure mainly in groups P, PA, PS, and PPS. CONCLUSION. The shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material exhibited significant differences according to the surface treatment methods. It is believed that excellent adhesive strength will be obtained when the Rocatec system is applied to 3D-printed dentures in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Rafee MA. The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: A literature review. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:1841-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1181_19
  2. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:5-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121203
  3. Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Heshmati RH, McGlumphy EA. Clinical performance of CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:431-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.017
  4. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:361-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2
  5. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60015-8
  6. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.017
  7. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:478-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017
  8. Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:351-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.014
  9. Janeva NM, Kovacevska G, Elencevski S, Panchevska S, Mijoska A, Lazarevska B. Advantages of CAD/CAM versus conventional complete dentures - a review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6:1498-502. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.308
  10. Lee DH, Lee JS. Comparison of flexural strength according to thickness between CAD/CAM denture base resins and conventional denture base resins. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2020;36:183-95. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.3.183
  11. Azari A, Nikkad S. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2009;15;216-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540910961946
  12. Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive manufacturing techniques in prosthodontics: Where do we currently stand? A critical review. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:474-84. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5079
  13. You SG, You SM, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:479-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.039
  14. He Y, Wu Y, Fu J, Gao Q, Qiu J. Developments of 3D printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review. Electroanalysis 2016;28:1658-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600043
  15. Lee S. Prospect for 3D printing technology in medical, dental, and pediatric dental field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2016.43.1.93
  16. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  17. Christensen FT. Relining techniques for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:373-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90168-5
  18. Leles CR, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC. Bonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatment. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1153-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00786.x
  19. Kim HS, Jung JH, Bae JM, Kim JM, Kim YL. Tensile bond strength of chairside reline resin to denture bases fabricated by sutractive and additive manufacturing. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2020;58:177-84. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.3.177
  20. Awad AN, Cho SH, Kesterke MJ, Chen JH. Comparison of tensile bond strength of denture reline materials on denture bases fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Aug 6:S0022-3913(21)00365-6.
  21. al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1
  22. Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CKY, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:699-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.032
  23. Palitsch A, Hannig M, Ferger P, Balkenhol M. Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: the role of conditioning liquids. J Dent 2012;40:210-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.010
  24. ISO 10139-2. Dentistry - Soft lining materials for removable dentures - Part 2: Materials for long-term use. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2016.
  25. Wemken G, Burkhardt F, Spies BC, Kleinvogel L, Adali U, Sterzenbach G, Beuer F, Wesemann C. Bond strength of conventional, subtractive, and additive manufactured denture bases to soft and hard relining materials. Dent Mater 2021;37:928-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.02.018
  26. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE. Swelling of poly(methyl methacrylate) resin at the repair joint. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:254-8.
  27. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Nat R. The swelling phenomenon of acrylic resin polymer teeth at the interface with denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:194-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70125-2
  28. Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.024
  29. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater 2007;23:506-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008
  30. Li P, Kramer-Fernandez P, Klink A, Xu Y, Spintzyk S. Repairability of a 3D printed denture base polymer: Ef- fects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021;114:104227.
  31. Lim NK, Shin SY. Bonding of conventional provisional resin to 3D printed resin: the role of surface treatments and type of repair resins. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:322-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.322
  32. Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Effect of in-termediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 2007;32:363-71. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-105
  33. Zhang H, Fang J, Hu Z, Ma J, Han Y, Bian J. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the bonding of a soft liner to an acrylic resin denture material. Dent Mater J 2010;29:398-402. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-124
  34. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U, Ozdemir AK. Effect of sandblasting with different size of aluminum oxide particles on tensile bond strength of resilient liner to denture base. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14:5-11.
  35. Debnath S, Wunder SL, McCool JI, Baran GR. Silane treatment effects on glass/resin interfacial shear strengths. Dent Mater 2003;19:441-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00089-1
  36. Jeong KW, Kim SH. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:95-104. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.95
  37. Bayati OH, Yunus N, Ahmad SF. Tensile bond strengths of silicone soft liners to two chemically different denture base resins. Int J Adhes 2012;34:32-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.12.003
  38. Choi E, Kwon EJ. Effects of treatment of silane coupling agent in MPS concentration on the shear bond strength between self curing resins and heat curing resin. J Korea Content Assoc 2015;15:344-51. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.02.344
  39. Kim YS, Woo YH, Lim HN, Choi BB. Stduy on the surface morphologe and shear bond strength of in-ceram core to resin cement after varing modes of surface conditioning. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1995;33: 693-704.
  40. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical sili- ca-coating. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350701459753
  41. Park KS, Shin SY, Cho IH. Effects of surface treatments of the zirconium-based ceramic on the bond strength of resin cement. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2006;22:221-30.
  42. Kumbulo lu O, Yildirim B, Husain NA, Ozcan M. Adhesion potential of relining materials to polyamide and PMMA-based denture base materials: effect of surface conditioning methods. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33: 1939-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1617935
  43. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1
  44. Silva Cde S, Machado AL, Chaves Cde A, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE. Effect of thermal cycling on denture base and autopolymerizing reline resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:219-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130061
  45. Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, de Souza RM, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater 2007;23:1086-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002