DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reviews Analysis of Korean Clinics Using LDA Topic Modeling

토픽 모델링을 활용한 한의원 리뷰 분석과 마케팅 제언

  • 김초명 (경희대학교 대학원 의료경영학과) ;
  • 조아람 (경희대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 김양균 (경희대학교 대학원 의료경영학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.11
  • Accepted : 2022.02.22
  • Published : 2022.03.01

Abstract

Objectives: In the health care industry, the influence of online reviews is growing. As medical services are provided mainly by providers, those services have been managed by hospitals and clinics. However, direct promotions of medical services by providers are legally forbidden. Due to this reason, consumers, like patients and clients, search a lot of reviews on the Internet to get any information about hospitals, treatments, prices, etc. It can be determined that online reviews indicate the quality of hospitals, and that analysis should be done for sustainable hospital marketing. Method: Using a Python-based crawler, we collected reviews, written by real patients, who had experienced Korean medicine, about more than 14,000 reviews. To extract the most representative words, reviews were divided by positive and negative; after that reviews were pre-processed to get only nouns and adjectives to get TF(Term Frequency), DF(Document Frequency), and TF-IDF(Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency). Finally, to get some topics about reviews, aggregations of extracted words were analyzed by using LDA(Latent Dirichlet Allocation) methods. To avoid overlap, the number of topics is set by Davis visualization. Results and Conclusions: 6 and 3 topics extracted in each positive/negative review, analyzed by LDA Topic Model. The main factors, consisting of topics were 1) Response to patients and customers. 2) Customized treatment (consultation) and management. 3) Hospital/Clinic's environments.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J. E., Kim, S. D., & Kim, H. W. (2018). A Study on Sentiment Score of Healthcare Service Quality on the Hospital Rating. Information Systems Review, 20(2)111-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.14329/isr.2018.20.2.111
  2. Verhoef, L. M., Van de Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Schoonhoven, L., & Kool, R. B. (2014). Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping review. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3024
  3. Lee, S. H., Jo, A. R. & Lee, H. Y. (2017). The Medical Service Customer's Satisfaction Factors Extracted from Online Hospital Review Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method. Journal of Korea Service Management Society, 18(5), 23-44 https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2017.18.5.002
  4. Choi, J. E., Kim, S. D., & Kim, H. W. (2018). A Study on Sentiment Score of Healthcare Service Quality on the Hospital Rating. Information Systems Review, 20(2)111-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.14329/isr.2018.20.2.111
  5. Seo, Y.J., Kang, S.H., Kim, Y. H. Choi, D.B. & Shin, H.K. (2010). Customers' Utilization and Satisfaction in Oriental Medical Clinics. Journal of Korean Medicine,31(2), 124-136
  6. Cho, C.H. (2010). An Effect of Medical Service Quality on Relationship Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Reuse Intent in Oriental Medical Hospital. Korean Journal of Hospital Management, 5(2), 107-132
  7. Han, H.K., Oh, C.S., Ryu, J.S. & Im, B.M. (2014). Comparison of Patients' Satisfactions with General Korean Medicine Clinics and Networked Korean Medicine Clinics in Seoul, Korea. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine, 18(3), 57-67
  8. Sparks, B.A. & Browning, V. (2012). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism management, 32(6), 1310-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011
  9. Sotiriadis, M.D. & Van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: the use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9108-1
  10. Bickart, B & Schindler, R.M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of interactive marketing, 15(3), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1014
  11. Bailey, A. A. (2005). Consumer awareness and use of product review websites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2005.10722109
  12. Kim, Y. J. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2015). Online social influence: Past, present, and future. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 163-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679175
  13. Maslowska E., Malthouse E. C. & Bernritter S. F. (2017). Too good to be true: the role of online reviews' features in probability to buy. International Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1195622
  14. Choi, H. (2010) A Study on the Effects of Word-of-Mouth's Marketing Factors and Medical-Care Service Purchase. Korean Journal of Hospital Management, 15(4), 143-164
  15. Lee, S. H., Jo, A. R. & Lee, H. Y. (2017). The Medical Service Customer's Satisfaction Factors Extracted from Online Hospital Review Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method. Journal of Korea Service Management Society, 18(5), 23-44 https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2017.18.5.002
  16. Ranard, B. L., Werner, R. M., Antanavicius, T., Schwartz, H. A., Smith, R. J., Meisel, Z. F., Asch, D. A., Ungar, L. H., & Merchant, R. M. (2016). Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care. Health affairs (Project Hope), 35(4), 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030
  17. Levy, S. E., Duan, W., & Boo, S. (2013). An Analysis of One-Star Online Reviews and Responses in the Washington, D.C., Lodging Market. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965512464513
  18. Raza, A., & Dehury, R. (2021). Dissatisfaction Factors That Influence Customers To Give Low Online Rating To Hospitals. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 16(3), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v16i3.295
  19. Lee, D.W., Kim, Y.S. & Shin, E. J. (2021). Active Senior Contents Trend Analysis using LDA Topic Modeling. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 22(5), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2021.22.5.35