DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alternative splicing variant of NRP/B promotes tumorigenesis of gastric cancer

  • Kim, Aram (Department of Biochemistry, Institution of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Mok, Bo Ram (Department of Biochemistry, Institution of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Hahn, Soojung (Department of Microbiology, Institution of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Yoo, Jongman (Department of Microbiology, Institution of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Dong Hyun (Department of Dermatology, Bundang CHA Medical Center, School of Medicine, CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Aug (Department of Biochemistry, Institution of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, CHA University)
  • Received : 2022.02.23
  • Accepted : 2022.05.10
  • Published : 2022.07.31

Abstract

Gastrointestinal cancer is associated with a high mortality rate. Here, we report that the splice variant of NRP/B contributes to tumorigenic activity in highly malignant gastric cancer through dissociation from the tumor repressor, HDAC5. NRP/B mRNA expression is significantly higher in the human gastric cancer tissues than in the normal tissues. Further, high levels of both the NRP/B splice variant and Lgr5, but not the full-length protein, are found in highly tumorigenic gastric tumor cells, but not in non-tumorigenic cells. The loss of NRP/B markedly inhibits cell migration and invasion, which reduces tumor formation in vivo. Importantly, the inhibition of alternative splicing increases the levels of NRP/B-1 mRNA and protein in AGS cells. The ectopic expression of full-length NRP/B exhibits tumor-suppressive activity, whereas NRP/B-2 induces the noninvasive human gastric cancer cells tumorigenesis. The splice variant NRP/B-2 which loses the capacity to interact with tumor repressors promoted oncogenic activity, suggesting that the BTB/POZ domain in the N-terminus has a crucial role in the suppression of gastric cancer. Therefore, the regulation of alternative splicing of the NRP/B gene is a potential novel target for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We appreciate Dr. Shalom Avraham for providing us with NRP/B antibodies (VD2, SY5). This study was supported by a grant from the South Korean government (MSIT) and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant No. HR16C0002) to DHK.

References

  1. Black DL (2003) Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem 72, 291-336 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720
  2. Liu S and Cheng C (2013) Alternative RNA splicing and cancer. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 4, 547-566
  3. Skotheim RI and Nees M (2007) Alternative splicing in cancer: noise, functional, or systematic. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39, 1432-1449 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.02.016
  4. Fackenthal JD and Godley LA (2008) Aberrant RNA splicing and its functional consequences in cancer cells. Dis Model Mech 1, 37-42 https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.000331
  5. Sveen A, Kilpinen S, Ruusulehto A et al (2016) RNA splicing in cancer; expression changes and driver mutations of splicing factor genes. Oncogene 35, 2413-2427 https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.318
  6. Choi HY, Seok J, Kang GH, Lim KM, Cho SG (2021) The role of NUMB/NUMB isoforms in cancer stem cells. BMB Rep 54, 335-343 https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2021.54.7.048
  7. Hanahan D and Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  8. Cascino I, Fiucci G, Papoff G et al (1995) Three functional soluble forms of the human apoptosis-inducing Fas molecule are produced by alternative splicing. J Immunol 154, 2706-2713 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.154.6.2706
  9. Orian-Rousseau V, Chen L, Sleeman JP et al (2002) CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev 16, 3074-3086 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.242602
  10. Brown RL, Reinke LM, Damerow MS et al (2011) CD44 splice isoform switching in human and mouse epithelium is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest 121, 1064-1074 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI4454
  11. Hanahan D and Folkman J (1996) Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86, 353-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80108-7
  12. Wong MS, Chen L, Foster C et al (2013) Regulation of telomerase alternative splicing: a target for chemotherapy. Cell Rep 3, 1028-1035 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.011
  13. Jurica MS, Mesecar A, Heath P et al (1998) The allosteric regulation of pyruvate kinase by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Structure 6, 195-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00021-5
  14. Murray-Zmijewski F, Lane DP, Bourdon J-C (2006) p53/p63/p73 isoforms: an orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ 13, 962-972 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401914
  15. Mustelin T, Rahmouni S, Bottini N et al (2003) Role of protein tyrosine phosphatases in T cell activation. Immunol Rev 191, 139-147 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00014.x
  16. Chen C, Zhao S, Karnad A et al (2018) The biology and role of CD44 in cancer progression: therapeutic implications. J Hematol Oncol 11, 64 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0605-5
  17. Kim TA, Lim J, Ota S et al (1998) NRP/B, a novel nuclear matrix protein, associates with p110(RB) and is involved in neuronal differentiation. J Cell Biol 141, 553-566 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.3.553
  18. Yokota N, Mainprize TG, Taylor MD et al (2004) Identification of differentially expressed and developmentally regulated genes in medulloblastoma using suppression subtraction hybridization. Oncogene 23, 3444-3453 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207475
  19. Lapointe J, Li C, Higgins JP et al (2004) Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 811-816 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0304146101
  20. Kim TA, Ota S, Jiang S et al (2000) Genomic organization, chromosomal localization and regulation of expression of the neuronal nuclear matrix protein NRP/B in human brain tumors. Gene 255, 105-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00297-3
  21. Fujita M, Furukawa Y, Tsunoda et al (2001) Up-regulation of the ectodermal-neural cortex 1 (ENC1) gene, a downstream target of the beta-catenin/T-cell factor complex, in colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res 61, 7722-7726
  22. Godt D, Couderc JL, Cramton SE et al (1993) Pattern formation in the limbs of Drosophila: bric a brac is expressed in both a gradient and a wave-like pattern and is required for specification and proper segmentation of the tarsus. Development 119, 799-812 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119.3.799
  23. Polyak K, Xia Y, Zweier JL et al (1997) A model for p53-induced apoptosis. Nature 389, 300-305 https://doi.org/10.1038/38525
  24. Choi J, Yang ES, Cha K et al (2014) The nuclear matrix protein, NRP/B, acts as a transcriptional repressor of E2Fmediated transcriptional activity. J cancer Prev 19, 187-198 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2014.19.3.187
  25. Worton LE, Shi YC, Smith EJ et al (2017) Ar ticle Ectodermal-neural cortex 1 isoforms have contrasting effects on MC3T3-E1 osteoblast mineralization and gene expression. J Cell Biochem 118, 2141-2150 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25851
  26. Ye M, Fang Z, Gu H et al (2017) Histone deacetylase 5 promotes the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma via increasing the transcription of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α under hypoxia condition. Tumour Biol 39, 1010428317705034
  27. Lee KH, Choi EY, Kim MK et al (2010) Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity down-regulates urokinase plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in gastric cancer. Mol Cell Biochem 343, 163-171 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-010-0510-x
  28. Singh S, Narayanan SP, Biswas K et al (2017) Intragenic DNA methylation and BORIS-mediated cancer-specific splicing contribute to the Warburg effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114,11440-11445 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708447114
  29. Jang BG, Kim HS, Chang WY et al (2018) Expression profile of LGR5 and its prognostic significance in colorectal cancer progression. Am J Pathol 188, 2236-2250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.06.012
  30. Qi Z, Li Y, Zhao B et al (2017) BMP restricts stemness of intestinal Lgr5+ stem cells by directly suppressing their signature genes. Nat Commun 8, 13824 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13824
  31. Xu P, Dang Y, Wang L et al (2016) Lgr4 is crucial for skin carcinogenesis by regulating MEK/ERK and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Cancer Lett 383, 161-170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.005
  32. Li XB, Yang G, Zhu L et al (2016) Gastric Lgr5+ stem cells are the cellular origin of invasive intestinal-type gastric cancer in mice. Cell Res 26, 838-849 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.47
  33. Yin X, Farin HF, Es JH et al (2014) Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. Nat Methods 11, 106-112 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2737