Wind and Structures

  • 제34권6호
  • /
  • Pages.483-497
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A 3D CFD analysis of flow past a hipped roof with comparison to industrial building standards

  • Khalil, Khalid (Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University) ;
  • Khan, Huzafa (Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University) ;
  • Chahar, Divyansh (Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University) ;
  • Townsend, Jamie F. (Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University) ;
  • Rana, Zeeshan A. (Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.04
  • 심사 : 2022.05.15
  • 발행 : 2022.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of flow around a hipped-roof building representative of UK inland conditions are conducted. Unsteady simulations are performed using three variations of the k-ϵ RANS turbulence model namely, the Standard, Realizable, and RNG models, and their predictive capability is measured against current European building standards. External pressure coefficients and wind loading are found through the BS 6399-2:1997 standard (obsolete) and the current European standards (BS EN 1991-1-4:2005 and A1:20101). The current European standard provides a more conservative wind loading estimate compared to its predecessor and the k-ϵ RNG model falls within 15% of the value predicted by the current standard. Surface shear stream-traces and Q-criterion were used to analyze the flow physics for each model. The RNG model predicts immediate flow separation leading to the creation of vortical structures on the hipped-roof along with a larger separation region. It is observed that the Realizable model predicts the side vortex to be a result of both the horseshoe vortex and the flow deflected off it. These model-specific aerodynamic features present the most disparity between building standards at leeward roof locations. Finally, pedestrian comfort and safety criteria are studied where the k-ϵ Standard model predicts the most ideal pedestrian conditions and the Realizable model yields the most conservative levels.

키워드

과제정보

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

참고문헌

  1. Abdelfatah, N., Elawady, A., Irwin, P. and Gan, A. (2022), "Experimental investigation of wind impact on low-rise elevated residences", Eng. Struct,, 257(January), 114096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114096.
  2. Amini, M. and Memari, A.M. (2021), "LES simulations of wind-induced pressure on the floor system underside of elevated buildings", Wind Struct., 33(5), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2021.33.5.397.
  3. Blocken, B. (2014), "50 years of Computational Wind Engineering: Past, present and future", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 129, 69-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.03.008.
  4. Blocken, B. (2018), LES over RANS in Building Simulation for Outdoor and Indoor Applications: A foregone Conclusion?, 11(5), 821-870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3.
  5. British Standards Institution (2002), BS 6399-2: Loading for Buildings - Part 2: Code of Practice for Wind Loads, Technical Report, British Standards Institute.
  6. British Standards Institution (2005), BS EN 1991-1-4: Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures - Part 1-4: General Actions - Wind Actions, Technical report, British Standards Institute.
  7. British Standards Institution (2010), BS NA EN 1991-1-4: UK National Annex to Eurocode 1. Actions on Structures. General Actions. Wind Actions, Technical Report, British Standards Institute.
  8. Crasto, G. (2007), Numerical Simulations of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cagliari.
  9. Fernando, S., Fernando, S. and Mendis, P. (2020), "Pedestrian wind comfort study using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation", 44(2013), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9749-3_30.
  10. Han, Y., Shen, L., Xu, G., Cai, C.S., Hu, P. and Zhang, J. (2018), "Multiscale simulation of wind field on a long-span bridge site in mountainous area", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 177, 260-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.04.012.
  11. Hargreaves, D.M. and Wright, N.G. (2007), "On the use of the k-epsilon model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 95(5), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.08.002.
  12. Janssen, W.D., Blocken, B. and van Hooff, T. (2013), "Pedestrian wind comfort around buildings: Comparison of wind comfort criteria based on whole-flow field data for a complex case study", Build. Environ., 59, 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.012.
  13. Juretic, F. and Kozmar, H. (2013), "Computational modeling of the neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer flow using the standard k-ϵ turbulence model", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 115, 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.01.011.
  14. Krajnovic, S. and Davidson, L. (2005), "Flow around a simplified car, part 2: Understanding the flow", J. Fluids Eng., 127, 919-928. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1989372.
  15. Liu, S., Pan, W., Zhao, X., Zhang, H., Cheng, X., Long, Z. and Chen, Q. (2018), "Influence of surrounding buildings on wind flow around a building predicted by CFD simulations", Build. Environ., 140(May), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.011.
  16. Martinuzzi, R. and Tropea, C. (1993), "The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow", J. Fluids Eng., 115, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2910118.
  17. Mittal, H., Sharma, A. and Gairola, A. (2018), "A review on the study of urban wind at the pedestrian level around buildings", J. Build. Eng., 18, 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.006.
  18. Montazeri, H. and Blocken, B. (2013), "CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis", Build. Environ., 60, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.012.
  19. Oberkampf, W.L. and Trucano, T.G. (2002), "Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics", Progress Aeros. Sci., 38, 209-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2
  20. Ozmen, Y., Baydar, E. and van Beeck, J.P. (2016), "Wind flow over the low-rise building models with gabled roofs having different pitch angles", Build. Environ., 95, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.014.
  21. Peren, J.I., van Hooff, T., Leite, B.C. and Blocken, B. (2015), "Impact of eaves on cross-ventilation of a generic isolated leeward sawtooth roof building: Windward eaves, leeward eaves and eaves inclination", Build. Environ., 92, 578-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.011.
  22. Richards, P.J. and Hoxey, R.P. (1993), "Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-epsilon turbulence model", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 46-47(C), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90124-7.
  23. Richards, P.J. and Norris, S.E. (2011), "Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models revisited", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 99(4), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.008.
  24. Roache, P.J. (2009), Fundamentals of Verification and Validation, Hermosa Publishers.
  25. Stathopoulos, T. (2006), "Pedestrian level winds and outdoor human comfort", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 94(11), 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.06.011.
  26. Steinbrenner, J.P. and Abelanet, J.P. (2007), "Anisotropic tetrahedral meshing based on surface deformation techniques", In "45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit". https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-554.
  27. Stull, R.B. (1988), An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Springer Science + Business Media.
  28. Tominaga, Y., ichi Akabayashi, S., Kitahara, T. and Arinami, Y. (2015), "Air flow around isolated gable-roof buildings with different roof pitches: Wind tunnel experiments and CFD simulations", Build. Environ., 84, 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.012.
  29. Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Murakami, S. and Sawaki, S. (2008a), "Comparison of various revised k-ϵ models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96(4), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.01.004.
  30. Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M. and Shirasawa, T. (2008b), "AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96, 1749-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058.
  31. Tominaga, Y. and Stathopoulos, T. (2009), "Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: Comparison of various types of k-ϵ models", Atmos. Environ., 43(20), 3200-3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.038.
  32. van Druenen, T., van Hooff, T., Montazeri, H. and Blocken, B. (2019), "CFD evaluation of building geometry modifications to reduce pedestrian-level wind speed", Build. Environ., 163(April), 106293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106293.
  33. Xu, X., Yang, Q., Yoshida, A. and Tamura, Y. (2017), "Characteristics of pedestrian-level wind around super- tall buildings with various configurations", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 166, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.013.
  34. Yang, Y., Gu, M., Chen, S. and Jin, X. (2009), "New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 97(2), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.12.001.
  35. Zheng, X., Montazeri, H. and Blocken, B. (2020), "CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES", Build. Environ., 173(February), 106747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747