한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.97-111
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산지습지의 생태적 복원을 위한 수문학적 기능 평가에 관한 연구

A study on the estimation of hydrologic function for ecological restoration at forested wetland

  • 정유경 (국립산림과학원 산림생태연구과) ;
  • 강원석 (국립산림과학원 산림생태연구과) ;
  • 이헌호 (영남대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Jung, Yu-Gyeong (Forest Ecology Division, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kang, Won-Seok (Forest Ecology Division, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Lee, Heon-Ho (Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.29
  • 심사 : 2022.05.26
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was conducted as restoration work to improve the discharge in forested wetlands where there is a concern of damage and observed changes in the discharge and groundwater level. The monthly changes showed that during the wet season, the amount of discharge decreased after restoration and GWL increased. It showed that during the dry season, the GWL and discharge increased. The increased discharge after restoration seems to be the difference in the number of days with no rainfall duration. The change in discharge for each unit of rainfall showed a tendency to increase the baseflow and decrease the direct discharge after restoration. The recharge ratio of GWL showed a decreasing tendency as rainfall was higher. After restoration, it showed a higher tendency under rainfall with less than 20mm. It has been confirmed that the restoration implemented by the study caused such an effect as the increased baseflow and increased GWL. It would be an effective restoration method to maintain water resources in forested wetlands. In the initial rainfall, it demonstrated a certain level of effect, but it is necessary to develop a restoration technology that can decrease the amount of water discharged after the end of rainfall or during the period of no rainfall to protect and maintain the forested wetlands. Streamflow should be identified by each type of terrain of wetlands and a proper restoration countermeasure should be devised for the site where the discharge frequently occurs.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 국립산림과학원에서 추진하는 연구(FE1011-2022-02)에 의해 지원되었음

참고문헌

  1. Aboelnour M., MW. Gitau and BA. Engel. 2020. A comparison of streamflow and baseflow response to land use change and the variation in climate parameters using SWAT. Water 12(1): 191; doi:10.3390/w12010191.
  2. An JH., Lim CH., Jung SH. and Lee CS. 2017. Vegetation of Doombeong selected as a reference site for restoring wetland. Journal of Wetlands Research 19(2): 193-201. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2017.19.2.193
  3. Aronson J., Floret C., Floch ELe, Ovalle C and Pontanier R. 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semiarid regions, I. A view from the sourh. Restoration Ecology 1: 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00004.x
  4. Berger JJ. 1993. Ecological restoration and nonindigenous plant speies: a review. Restoration Ecology 1(2): 74-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00012.x
  5. Bosch DD., Arnold JG., Allen PG. Lim KJ. and Park Y.S. 2017. Temporal variationsin baseflow for the little river experimental watershed in South Geogia, USA. Journal of Hydrology 10: 110-121.
  6. Bridgham SD., Pastor J., Janssens J., Chapin C. and Malterer T. 1996. Multiple limiting gradients in peatlands: a call for a new paradigm. Wetlands 16: 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160645
  7. Bridgham SD., Updegraff K. and Pastor J. 1998. Carbon nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization in nirthern wetlands. Ecology 79(5): 1545-1561. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1545:CNAPMI]2.0.CO;2
  8. Bring A., Rosen L., Thorslund J. Tonderski Karin, Aberg C. and Envall I. 2020. Groundwater storage effects from restoring, constructing or draining wetlands in temperate and boreal climates: a systematic review protocol. Environmental Evidence 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00209-5
  9. Brodie RS. and S. Hosteler. 2005. A review of techniquesfor analysing baseflow from stream hydrographs. Proceedings of the NZHS-IAH-NZSSS, New Zealand: Conference Auckland.
  10. Buttle JM. 2018. Mediating stream baseflow response to climate change: The role of basin storage. Hydrological Process 32(3): 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11418
  11. Casanova MT. and Brock MA. 2000. How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecol. 147: 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875226637
  12. Cowardin LM, Carter V., FC. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS/OBS/-79/31.
  13. Ficklin DL., SM. Robeson and JH. Knouft. 2016. Impacts of recent climate change on trends in baseflow and stormflow in United States watersheds. Geophysical Research Letters 43(10): 5079-5088. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069121
  14. Freeze RA. and JA. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. London: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Gerritsen J. and Greening HS. 1989. Marsh seed banks of the Okefenolee swamps: effects of hydrologic regime and nutrients. Ecology 7; 750-7630. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940225
  16. Gibbs J, 2000. Wetland loss and biodiversitt conservation. Conservation Biology 14(1): 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98608.x
  17. GuCY. and JC. Seo. 2007. The study on the extraction of the potential mountainous wetlands using geographic information and satellite image. Journal of Korean Geomorphological Association 14(1): 53-65. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Hall, FR. 1968. Baseflow recession: A review. Water Resources Research 4(5): 973-983. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR004i005p00973
  19. Jang ES., EH. Lee and SH. Kim. 2015. Development of digital terrain analysisfor an identification of wetland area at mountainous watershed. Journal of Environment Science International 24(11): 1473-1783. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2015.24.11.1473
  20. Keller JK. and Bridgman SD. 2007. Pathways of anaerobic carbon cycling across an ombrotrophic-minerotrophic peatland gradient. Limnol. Oceanorg. 52(1): 96-107. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0096
  21. Kim H., HS. Shin, YT. Kim, DK. Park and T.K. Min. 2012. Analysis of seepage velocity in unsaturated weathered soils using rainfall infiltration test. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society 28(2): 71-78. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2012.28.2.71
  22. Kusler J. and Kentula M. 1990. Executive summary. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science. Washing, DC: Island Press.
  23. Lee JY., MY. Yi and DK. Hwang. 2005. Dependency of hydrologic responses and recharge estimates in water level monitoring locations within a small catchment. Geosciences Journal 9(3): 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910588
  24. Lewis Roy. 1989. Wetlands restoration/creation/enhancement terminology: Suggestions for standardizition. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. 417-422.
  25. Li AG., ZQ. Yue, LG. Tham, C.F. Lee and K.T. Law. 2005. Field monitored variations ofsoil moisture and matric suction in sarolite slope. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42(1): 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-069
  26. Lim JH.,JW. Kim and HS. Kim. 2018. Hydrological analysis and indexing for the drying of mountain wetlands. Proceedings of Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Seoul, pp. 274-275. (in Korean with English abstract)
  27. Lim JC., An KH.,Jo GJ., Chu YS., Yoon JD., Lee CS. and Choi BK. 2020. Vegetation diversity and management strategy of mountain wetlands in Cheonchuksan(Mt.) in Uljin. Journal of Wetlands Research 22(4): 264-274. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2020.22.4.264
  28. Maietta CE., Hondula KL., Jones CN. and Palmer MA. 2020. Hydrological conditions influence soil and methane-cycling microbial populations in seasonally saturated wetlands. Frontiers in Environmental Science 8: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.593942.
  29. McDonald T. Gann GD., Jonson J. and Dixon KW. 2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration-including principles and key concepts. Washington D.C.: Society for Ecological Restoration.
  30. Mein RG. and CL. Larson. 1973. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resrouces Research 9(2): 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR009i002p00384
  31. Mitsch WJ. and JG. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands(3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Moon SK., NC. Woo and K.S. Lee. 2004. Statistical analysis of hydrographs and water table fluctuation to estimate groundwater. Journal of Hydrology 292: 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.030
  33. Moritz CM., Vepraskas M.J. and Ricker M.C. 2022. Hydrology and vegetation relationships in an Carolina bay wetland 15 years after restoration. Wetland 42:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01530-0
  34. Nave LE., Drevnick PE., Heckman KA., Hofmeister KL. Veverica TJ. and Swanston CW. 2017. Soil hydrology, physical and chemical properties and the distribution of carbon and mercury postglacial lake-plain wetland. Geoderma 305: 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.035
  35. Padilla A., A. Pulido-Bosch and A. Mangin. 1994. Relative importance of baseflow and quickflow from hydrographs of Karstspring. Groundwater 32(2): 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00641.x
  36. Pinder GF. and FJ. Jones. 1969. Determination of the groundwater component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff. Water Resources 5(2): 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i002p00438
  37. Price K. 2011. Effects of watershed topography,soils, land use and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review. Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment. 35(4): 465-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402714
  38. Quevedo JA., N. Mobayed,C. Fuetes, E. Gonzales and CA. Chavez. 2016. Direct runoff events simulation in small basin with the HIDRAS model. Agrociencia 50(7): 787-798.
  39. Rahardjo H., TT. Lee, EC. Leong and R.B. Rezaur. 2005. Response of a residualsoilslope to rainfall. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42(2): 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-101
  40. Rodriguez ML., MM. Taboada and MT. Taboada. 2012. Rainfall-runoff response and event based runoff coefficientsin a humid area. Hydrological Sciences Journal 57(3): 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.666351
  41. SERI. 2002. The SER primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration, Science and Policy Working Group 2002.
  42. Song HK., Park GS. Park HR. and Kim MY. 2006. Vegetation and soil properties of a forested wetland in Jangdo, Sinan-gun. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 20(4): 407-414. (in Korean with English abstract)
  43. Tan Z, Zhang Q, Li M., Li M,, Li Y., Xu X and Jiang J. 2016. A study of the relationship between wetland vegetation communities and water regimes using a combined remote sensing and hydraulic modeling approach. Hydrology Research 47(S1): 278-292. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.216
  44. Todd MJ., Muneepeerakul R., Pumo D., Azaele S., Miralles-Wilhelm F., Rinaldo A. and Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2010. Hydrological drivers of wetland vegetation community distribution within Everglades National Park, Florida. Adv. Water Resour. 33: 1279-1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.04.003
  45. Toogood SE., Joyce CB. and Waite S. 2008. Response of floodplain grassland plant communities to altered water regimes. Plant Ecol. 1987: 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9378-6
  46. Van der Valk A. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62: 688-696 https://doi.org/10.2307/1937737
  47. Ye RZ., Jin Q., Bohannan B., Keller JK. and McAllister S.A. 2012. pH conrtols over anaerobic carbon mineralization, the efficiency of methan production and methanogenic pathways in peatlands across an ombrotrophic-minerotrophic gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem 54: 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.015
  48. Yeh HF., HI. Lin, CH. Lee, KC. Hsu and CS. Wu. 2014. Identifying seasonal groundwater recharge using environmental stable isotopes. Water 6(10): 2849-2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6102849
  49. Yun SW., YS. Kim, DH. Kim, HC. Kim, MC. Shin, JY. Park and JY. Lee. 2013. Comparative study on water level fluctuation and recharge characteristic in groundwaters of urban and rural areas in Gangwon Province. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea 49(4): 503-516. (in Korean with English abstract)