Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology (한국해양공학회지)

Korean Society of Ocean Engineers (한국해양공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shock-Resistance Responses of Frigate Equipments by Underwater Explosion

  • Kim, Hyunwoo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choung, Joonmo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • Received : 2022.04.11
  • Accepted : 2022.06.13
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA) models have been used to evaluate the shock-resistance responses of various equipments, including armaments mounted on a warship caused by underwater explosion (UNDEX). This paper aims to check the possibility of using one-dimensional (1D) FEA models for the shock-resistance responses. A frigate was chosen for the evaluation of the shock-resistance responses by the UNDEX. The frigate was divided into the thirteen discrete segments along the length of the ship. The 1D Timoshenko beam elements were used to model the frigate. The explosive charge mass and the stand-off distance were determined based on the ship length and the keel shock factor (KSF), respectively. The UNDEX pressure fields were generated using the Geers-Hunter doubly asymptotic model. The pseudo-velocity shock response spectrum (PVSS) for the 1D-FEA model (1D-PVSS) was calculated using the acceleration history at a concerned equipment position where the digital recursive filtering algorithm was used. The 1D-PVSS was compared with the 3D-PVSS that was taken from a reference, and a relatively good agreement was found. In addition, the 1D-PVSS was compared with the design criteria specified by the German Federal Armed forces, which is called the BV043. The 1D-PVSS was proven to be relatively reasonable, reducing the computing cost dramatically.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute which is funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (No. 146836) and by the Korea Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of Korea (No. 20213000000030).

References

  1. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). (2021). Guidance Notes on Ship Vibration. New York, USA: ABS.
  2. Building Specification for Ships of the Federal Armed Forces (BV). (1985). Shock Resistance Experimental and Mathematical Proof (BV043).
  3. Bae, S.W., Hong, J.S., Jeong, W.B., & Kim, J. (2009). Structural Safety Analysis of Propulsion Motors by BV043. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference, 254-255.
  4. Geers, T.L., & Hunter, K.S. (2002). An Integrated Wave-Effects Model for an Underwater Explosion Bubble. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 111(4), 1584-1601. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1458590
  5. Kim, J.B., Park, Y.K., Park, M.S., Lee, J.H., & An, S.C. (2017). Evaluation of the Shock Resistance of a Gas Turbine Package. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, 41(10), 1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2017.41.10.1005
  6. Kim, H., Seo, J.H., & Choung, J. (2021). A Study on Inelastic Whipping Responses in a Navy Ship by Underwater Explosion. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 58(6), 400-406. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2021.58.6.400
  7. Lee, S.W., Kim, J., & Kong, Y.K. (2010). A Shock-Proof Evaluation of a Naval Vessel Motor using DDAM and Transient Response Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 9(5), 76-82.
  8. Lee, J.B. (2012). A Study on Shock Resistance Evaluation of Steering Units for a War Vessel byUusing Dynamic Design Analysis Method (Master thesis). Changwon National University, Changwon, Korea.
  9. Lee, J.B., & Choung, J. (2020). A Study on BEM-Based Numerical Simulation Technique for Underwater Explosions. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 57(5), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2020.57.5.271
  10. Naval Sea System Command (NAVSEA). (1976). Test Plan for Routine Shock Testing of Ships. Washington, DC: NAVSEA.
  11. Naval Sea System Command (NAVSEA). (1995). Shock Design Criteria for Surface Ships. Washington, DC: NAVSEA.
  12. Scavuzzo, R.J., & Pusey, H.C. (1996). Principles and Techniques of Shock Data Analysis. Virginia: Booz Allen Hamilton.
  13. Seong, J., Choi, J., Kim, J., & Baek, S. (2015). A Study on Shock Resistance Evaluation of Equipment for a Naval Ship by Using BV-043. The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1361-1366.
  14. Simulia. (2018). Abaqus User Manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp.
  15. Smallwood, D.O. (1980). An Improved Recursive Formula for Calculating Shock Response Spectra. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 51(2), 211-217.