The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters

  • Hussein, Mostafa Omran (Department of Prosthodontic Sciences, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University) ;
  • Hussein, Lamis Ahmed (Dental Biomaterials, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University)
  • Received : 2022.01.30
  • Accepted : 2022.05.10
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied. RESULTS. The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities. CONCLUSION. Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support's density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Negm EE, Aboutaleb FA, Alam-Eldein AM. Virtual evaluation of the accuracy of fit and trueness in maxillary poly(etheretherketone) removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by direct and indirect CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthodont 2019;28:804-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13075
  2. Aarts JM, Choi JJE, Metcalfe S, Bennani V. Influence of build angulation on the mechanical properties of a direct-metal laser-sintered cobalt-chromium used for removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.014
  3. Xie W, Zheng M, Wang J, Li X. The effect of build orientation on the microstructure and properties of selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V for removable partial denture clasps. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:163-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.007
  4. AlMangour B, Luqman M, Grzesiak D, Al-Harbi H, Ijaz F. Effect of processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Co-Cr-Mo alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 2020;792:139456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139456
  5. Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Haider S, Ahmed N, Habib SR, Altamash S, Zafar MS, Alam MK. Fit accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated with cad/cam, rapid prototyping, and conventional techniques: A systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021:3194433.
  6. No-Cortes J, Ayres AP, Lima JF, Markarian RA, Attard NJ, Cortes ARG. Trueness, 3D deviation, time and cost comparisons between milled and 3d-printed resin single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2022;30:107-12.
  7. Oropallo W, Piegl LA. Ten challenges in 3D printing. Eng Comput 2016;32:135-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0
  8. Hussein MO, Hussein LA. Optimization of digital light processing three-dimensional printing of the removable partial denture frameworks; the role of build angle and support structure diameter. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062316
  9. Hwang S, An S, Robles U, Rumpf RC. Process parameter optimization for removable partial denture frameworks manufactured by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 2021:S0022-3913(21)00253-5. Online ahead of print.
  10. Srinivasan M, Kamnoedboon P, McKenna G, Angst L, Schimmel M, Ozcan M, Muller F. CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Dent 2021;113:103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103777
  11. Unkovskiy A, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Li P, Spintzyk S, Kraemer Fernandez P. Stereolithography vs. Direct light processing for rapid manufacturing of complete denture bases: an in vitro accuracy analysis. J Clin Med 2021;10:1070-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051070
  12. Ryu JE, Kim YL, Kong HJ, Chang HS, Jung JH. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:225-32. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.225
  13. Cakmak G, Cuellar AR, Donmez MB, Schimmel M, Abou-Ayash S, Lu WE, Yilmaz B. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and margin quality of 3D-printed interim dental crowns. Appl Sci 2021;11:9246-56. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199246
  14. Ravi P, Chen VCP. A focused simulation-based optimization of print time and material usage with respect to orientation, layer height and support settings for multi-pathological anatomical models in inverted vat photopolymerization 3D printing. 3D Print Med 2021;7:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00091-4
  15. Park GS, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Seo DG. Effects of printing parameters on the fit of implant-supported 3D printing resin prosthetics. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:2533-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162533
  16. Hada T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Soeda Y, Katheng A, Otake R, Minakuchi S. Effect of printing direction on the accuracy of 3D-printed dentures using stereolithography technology. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:3405-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13153405
  17. Jin MC, Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Kim SH, Han JS. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:473-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.014
  18. Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors Influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:503-10. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
  19. Rubayo DD, Phasuk K, Vickery JM, Morton D, Lin WS. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:658-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.012
  20. Son K, Son YT, Lee JM, Lee KB. Marginal and internal fit and intaglio surface trueness of interim crowns fabricated from tooth preparation of four finish line locations. Sci Rep 2021;11:13947-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93455-7
  21. Rungrojwittayakul O, Kan JY, Shiozaki K, Swamidass RS, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL. Accuracy of 3D printed models created by two technologies of printers with different designs of model base. J Prosthodont 2020;29:124-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13107
  22. ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of measurement methods and results-part 1: general principles and definitions. International Organization of Standardization, (ISO); Germany; Switzerland, 1998.
  23. Asiga MAX User Guide. In: https://www.asiga.com/media/main/files/printers/MAX_us_en.pdf., ed 2017. p. 1-2.
  24. Tasaka A, Shimizua T, Katoa Y, Okanoa H, Idaa Y, Higuchib S, Yamashitaa S. Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.009
  25. Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med 2021;10:2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092010