DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synthesis of barium-doped PVC/Bi2WO6 composites for X-ray radiation shielding

  • Received : 2021.04.08
  • Accepted : 2021.07.29
  • Published : 2022.01.25

Abstract

In this study, composites containing undoped and barium-doped Bi2WO6:Ba2+were investigated for their shielding against diagnostic X-ray. At first, Bi2WO6 and barium-doped Bi2WO6 were synthesized with different weight percentages of barium oxide through a hydrothermal process. The as-synthesized nanostructures were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Raman spectroscopy (RS). After that, some shields were generated with undoped and barium-doped Bi2WO6:Ba2+ nanostructure particles incorporated into polyvinyl chloride (PVC) polymer with different thicknesses and 15% weight of the nanostructure. Finally, the prepared samples were exposed to an X-ray tube at 40, 80, and 120 kV voltages, 10 mAs and, 44.5 cm SID (i.e. the distance from the X-ray beam source to the specimen). Linear and mass attenuation coefficients were also calculated for different samples. The results indicated that, among the samples, the one with 7.5 mmol barium-doped Bi2WO6 had the most attenuation at the voltage of 40kV, and the attenuation coefficients would increase with an increase in the amount of barium. The samples with 15 and 17.5 mmol barium-doped Bi2WO6 had higher attenuation than the others at 80 and 120 kV. Moreover, the half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL) and 0.25 mm lead equivalent thickness were calculated for all the samples. The lowest HVL value was for the sample with 7.5 mmol barium-doped Bi2WO6. As the result clearly show, an increment in the barium-doping content leads to a decrease in both HVL and TVL. In every three voltages, 0.25 mm lead equivalent thickness of the barium-doped composites (7.5 mmol and 15 mmol) had less than the other composites. The lowest value of 0.25 mm lead equivalent thickness was 7.5 barium-doped in 40 kV voltage and 15 mmol barium-doped in 80 kV and 120 kV voltages. These results were obtained only for 15% weight of the nanostructure.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the RRC (Radiation Research Center) of Shiraz University for friendly cooperation.

References

  1. M. Mahesh, The essential physics of medical imaging, third edition, Med. Phys. 40 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4811156, 077301.
  2. H.M. Soylu, F. Yurt Lambrecht, O.A. Ersoz, Gamma radiation shielding efficiency of a new lead-free composite material, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 305 (2015) 529-534, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4051-3.
  3. J. Kim, D. Seo, B.C. Lee, Y.S. Seo, W.H. Miller, Nano-W dispersed gamma radiation shielding materials, Adv. Eng. Mater. 16 (2014) 1083-1089, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400127.
  4. J.H. Liu, Q.P. Zhang, N. Sun, Y. Zhao, R. Shi, Y.L. Zhou, J. Zheng, Elevated gamma-rays shielding property in lead-free bismuth tungstate by nanofabricating structures, J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 112 (2018) 185-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.007.
  5. H. Chai, X. Tang, M. Ni, F. Chen, Y. Zhang, D. Chen, Y. Qiu, Preparation and properties of novel, flexible, lead-free X-ray-shielding materials containing tungsten and bismuth(III) oxide, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 133 (2016) 43012, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43012.
  6. H. Alavian, H. Tavakoli-Anbaran, Study on gamma shielding polymer composites reinforced with different sizes and proportions of tungsten particles using MCNP code, Prog. Nucl. Energy 115 (2019) 91-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.03.033.
  7. N. Asari Shik, L. Gholamzadeh, X-ray shielding performance of the EPVC composites with micro- or nanoparticles of WO3, PbO or Bi2O3, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 139 (2018) 61-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APRADISO.2018.03.025.
  8. L. Gholamzadeh, N. Asari-Shik, M.K. Aminian, M. Ghasemi-Nejad, A study of the shielding performance of fibers coated with high-Z oxides against ionizing radiations, Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect.A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 973 (2020) 164174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164174.
  9. J.W. Hong, D.H. Kim, S.W. Kim, S.H. Choi, G.E. Lee, H.K. Seo, S.H. Kim, Y. Lee, Effectiveness evaluation of self-produced micro- and nanosized tungsten materials for radiation shielding with diagnostic X-ray imaging system, Optik 172 (2018) 760-765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.07.107.
  10. H.A. Maghrabi, A. Vijayan, P. Deb, L. Wang, Bismuth oxide-coated fabrics for X-ray shielding, Textil. Res. J. 86 (2016) 649-658, https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517515592809.
  11. A. Erol, I. Pocan, E. Yanbay, O. Ersoz, F. Lambrecht, Radiation shielding of polymer composite materials with wolfram carbide and boron carbide, Radiat. Protect. Environ. 39 (2016) 3-6, https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0464.185147.
  12. S.C. Kim, J.R. Choi, B.K. Jeon, Physical analysis of the shielding capacity for a lightweight apron designed for shielding low intensity scattering X-rays, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 27721, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27721.
  13. J. Kim, D. Seo, B.C. Lee, Y.S. Seo, W.H. Miller, Nano-W dispersed gamma radiation shielding materials, Adv. Eng. Mater. 16 (2014) 1083-1089, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400127.
  14. A. Barabash, D. Barabash, V. Pertsev, D. Panfilov, Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection, Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 983 (2019) 352-360, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19868-8_36.
  15. N.Z.N. Azman, S.A. Siddiqui, R. Hart, I.M. Low, Microstructural design of lead oxide-epoxy composites for radiation shielding purposes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 128 (2013) 3213-3219, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38515.
  16. W. Poltabtim, E. Wilmolmala, K. Saenboonruang, Properties of lead-free gamma-ray shielding materials from metal oxide/EPDM rubber composites, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 153 (2018) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.036.
  17. S. Jayakumar, T. Saravanan, J. Philip, Polymer nanocomposites containing β-Bi2O3 and silica nanoparticles : thermal stability, surface topography and X-ray attenuation properties, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 137 (2020) 49048, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49048.
  18. S. Jayakumar, T.S. John, J. Philip, Preparation, characterization and X-ray attenuation property of Gd2O3 based nanocomposites, Appl. Nanosci. 7 (2017) 919-931, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-017-0631-6.
  19. C. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Synthesis of square Bi2WO6 nanoplates as high-Activity visible-light-driven photocatalysts, Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 3537-3545, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0501517.
  20. Y.C. Xu, C. Song, X.Y. Ding, Y. Zhao, D.G. Xu, Q.P. Zhang, Y.L. Zhou, Tailoring lattices of Bi2WO6 crystals via Ce doping to improve the shielding properties against low-energy gamma rays, J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 127 (2019) 76-80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.12.007.
  21. N. Damla, U. Cevik, A.I. Kobya, A. Celik, N. Celik, R. Van Grieken, Radiation dose estimation and mass attenuation coefficients of cement samples used in Turkey, J. Hazard Mater. 176 (2010) 644-649, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.080.
  22. S. Atef, D.E. El-Nashar, A.H. Ashour, S. El-Fiki, S.U. El-Kameesy, M. Medhat, Effect of gamma irradiation and lead content on the physical and shielding properties of PVC/NBR polymer blends, Polym. Bull. 77 (2020) 5423-5438, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-03022-4.
  23. R. Bagheri, S.P. Shirmardi, Gamma-ray shielding studies on borate glasses containing BaO, Bi2O3, and PbO in different concentrations, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 184 (2021) 109434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109434.
  24. J.K. Shultis, R.E. Faw, Radiation Shielding and Radiological Protection, Handb. Nucl. Eng., Springer US, Boston, MA, 2010, pp. 1313-1448, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98149-9_11.
  25. J.K. Shultis, R.E. Faw, Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering, first ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203910351.
  26. J.P. McCaffrey, E. Mainegra-Hing, H. Shen, Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers, Med. Phys. 36 (2009) 5586-5594, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3260839.