DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative analyses of a shield building subjected to a large commercial aircraft impact between decoupling method and coupling method

  • Han, Pengfei (Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Liu, Jingbo (Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Fei, Bigang (State Quality (Beijing) Construction Engineering Testing & Appraisal Center)
  • Received : 2020.09.14
  • Accepted : 2021.07.04
  • Published : 2022.01.25

Abstract

Comparative analyses of a shield building subjected to a large commercial aircraft impact between decoupling method and coupling method are performed in this paper. The decoupling method is applying impact force time-history curves on impact area of the shield building to study impact damage effects on structure. The coupling method is using a model including aircraft and shield building to perform simulation of the entire impact process. Impact force time-history curves of the fuselage, wing and engine and their total impact force time-history curve are obtained by the entire aircraft normally impacting the rigid wall. Taking aircraft structure and impact progress into account some loading areas are determined to perform some comparative analyses between decoupling method and coupling method, the calculation results including displacement, plastic strain of concrete and stress of steel plate in impact area are given. If the loading area is determined unreasonably, it will be difficult to assess impact damage of impact area even though the accurate impact force of each part of aircraft obtained already. The coupling method presented at last in this paper can more reasonably evaluate the dynamic response of the shield building than the decoupling methods used in the current nuclear engineering design.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (Grant No. 2018ZX06902016).

References

  1. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Aircraft Impact Assessment, 10 CFR 50, vol. 150, 2009.
  2. J.D. Riera, On the stress analysis of structures subjected to aircraft impact forces, Nucl. Eng. Des. 8 (4) (1968) 415-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(68)90039-3
  3. J.P. Wolf, K.M. Bucher, P.E. Skrikerud, Response of equipment to aircraft impact, Nucl. Eng. Des. 47 (1) (1978) 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(78)90014-6
  4. W.A. Von Riesemann, R.L. Parrish, D.C. Bickel, S.R. Heffelfinger, Full-scale aircraft impact test for evaluation of impact forces part 1: test plan, test method, and test results, in: Transactions of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Anaheim, USA, 1989, pp. 285-292. August 22-27.
  5. K. Muto, H. Tachikawa, T. Sugano, H. Tsubota, H. Kobayashi, Y. Kasai, N. Koshika, T. Tsujimoto, Experimental studies on local damage of reinforced concrete structures by the impact of deformable missiles part 1: outline of test program and small-scale tests, in: Transactions of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Anaheim, USA, 1989, pp. 257-264. August 22-27.
  6. K. Muto, T. Sugano, H. Tsubota, N. Nagamatsu, N. Koshika, M. Okano, K. Suzuki, O. Satoshil, Experimental studies on local damage of reinforced concrete structures by the impact of deformable missiles part 3: full-scale tests, in: Transactions of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Anaheim, USA, 1989, pp. 271-278. August 22-27.
  7. J. Mizuno, N. Koshika, Y. Sawamoto, N. Niwa, T. Yamashita, A. Suzuki, Investigation on impact resistance of steel plate reinforced concrete barriers against aircraft impact part1: test program and results, in: Transactions of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Beijing, China, August 7-12, 2005, pp. 2566-2579.
  8. W. Riedel, M. Noldgena, E. Strassburger, K. Thoma, E. Fehling, Local damage to Ultra High Performance Concrete structures caused by an impact of aircraft engine missiles, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (2010) 2633-2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.07.036
  9. H. Abbas, D.K. Paul, P.N. Godbole, G.C. Nayak, Aircraft crash upon outer containment of nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des. 160 (1996) 13-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(95)01049-1
  10. M. Kukreja, Damage evaluation of 500MWe Indian Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor nuclear containment for aircraft impact, Nucl. Eng. Des. 235 (2005) 1807-1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.05.015
  11. M.A. Iqbal, S. Rai, M.R. Sadique, P. Bhargava, Numerical simulation of aircraft crash on nuclear containment structure, Nucl. Eng. Des. 243 (2012) 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.11.019
  12. D.K. Thai, S.E. Kim, Safety assessment of a nuclear power plant building subjected to an aircraft crash, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.07.053
  13. J.B. Liu, W.K. Zheng, Impact load analysis on a nuclear power plant impacted by a large commercial aircraft, J. Vib. Shock 33 (6) (2014) 97-112 (in Chinese).
  14. J.B. Liu, P.F. Han, W.K. Zheng, X.Z. Lu, L. Lin, Numerical investigation of shield building for nuclear power plant subjected to commercial aircraft impact, Explos. Shock Waves 36 (3) (2016) 391-399 (in Chinese).
  15. X.Z. Lu, K.Q. Lin, S. Cen, Z. Xu, L. Lin, Comparing different fidelity models for the impact analysis of large commercial aircrafts on a containment building, Eng. Fail. Anal. 57 (2015) 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.002
  16. J.B. Liu, P.F. Han, Numerical analyses of a shield building subjected to a large commercial aircraft impact, Shock Vib. (2018) 1-17. Article ID 7854969.
  17. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual, 2012. Version 971.
  18. G.R. Johnson, W.H. Cook, Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures, Eng. Fract. Mech. 21 (1) (1985) 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
  19. M.R. Karim, M.S. Hoo Fatt, Impact of the Boeing 767 aircraft into the world trade center, J. Eng. Mech. 131 (10) (2005) 1066-1072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2005)131:10(1066)
  20. N. Jones, Structural Impact, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989.
  21. K.S. Kim, I.H. Moon, H.J. Choi, D.W. Nam, A preliminary study on the local impact behavior of steel-plate concrete walls, Ann. Nucl. Energy 102 (2017) 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.12.006
  22. J. Mizuno, N. Koshika, H. Morikawa, K. Wakimoto, K. Kobayashi, R. Fukuda, Investigation on impact resistance of steel plate reinforced concrete barriers against aircraft impact Part 2: simulation analyses of scale model impact tests, in: Transactions of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Beijing, China, August 7-12, 2005, pp. 2580-2590.
  23. L.J. Malvar, C.A. Ross, Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension, ACI Mater. J. 95 (6) (1998) 735-739.
  24. China National Nuclear Safety Administration, Compilation of Nuclear Safety Guidelines, China legal publishing house, Beijing, China, 1998.
  25. X.Y. Zhu, R. Pan, G. Lin, L. Li, FEM analysis of steel plate concrete containment against commercial aircraft impact based on force time-history analysis method, J. Vib. Shock 34 (1) (2015) 1-5 (in Chinese).
  26. J. Arros, N. Doumbalski, Analysis of aircraft impact to concrete structures, Nucl. Eng. Des. 237 (2007) 1241-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.044
  27. A. Andonov, K. Apostolov, D. Stefanov, M. Kostov, Parametric study on the floor response spectra and the damage potential of aircraft impact induced vibratory loading, J. Disaster Res. 5 (4) (2010) 417-424. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2010.p0417
  28. T.R.S. Mullapudi, P. Summers, I.H. moon, Impact analysis of steel plated concrete wall, in: Transactions of Structures Congress, Chicago, USA, March 29-31, 2012, pp. 1881-1893.