자원ㆍ환경경제연구 (Environmental and Resource Economics Review)

한국자원경제학회 (Korean Resource Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생산기반 온실가스 배출량 vs 소비기반 온실가스 배출량

Production-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Consumption-Based Emissions

  • Hong Chong, Cho (Department of Economics, Dankook University) ;
  • Hyojung, Koo (Department of International Business Administration, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.31
  • 심사 : 2022.11.03
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 1990년부터 2021년까지의 소비기반 온실가스 배출량을 산업부문별로 산정하고, 국가 간 교역으로 인하여 이전되는 온실가스 배출량을 비교하여 한국에 어떤 시사점을 주는지 분석하였다. 결과적으로, 미국, 독일, EU, OECD 등에서 생산기반 배출량과 소비기반 배출량이 동시에 점점 감소되는 것을 확인했다. 한국은 생산기반 배출량이 소비기반 배출량보다 많으며 이는 수출주도 경제 구조 때문으로 확인된다. 이러한 다른 선진국들과 달리 한국은 육로를 통한 에너지 교역이 불가능하기 때문에 한국만의 특징을 고려한 온실가스 저감계획을 수립하는 것이 타당하다고 말할 수 있다.

In this study, consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2021 are calculated by the industry sector, and greenhouse gas emissions transferred due to trade between countries are compared to analyze what implications Korea has. As a result, production-based and consumption-based emissions in the United States, Germany, the EU, and the OECD are gradually decreasing. Production-based emission in Korea is larger than consumption-based emissions because Korean economic structure is import-oriented. However, unlike other developed countries, Korea cannot trade energy by land, so it can be said that it is reasonable to establish a greenhouse gas reduction plan considering Korea's unique characteristics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 관세청, Accessed 2022.09.30., https://www.customs.go.kr
  2. 문승운, "동북아시아 미세먼지의 생산기반 배출량과 소비기반 배출량의 비교: 한국, 중국, 일본을 대상으로", 「국토연구」, 2020, pp. 31~47.
  3. 신동천, "국제무역에 함유된 탄소이력 (carbon footprint) 의 측정과 분석: MRIO 모형의 응용", 「자원.환경경제연구」, 제22권 제1호, 2013, pp. 31~52.
  4. 신동천.이혁.김용균, "한국의 수출에 함유된 국내외 탄소배출 비중과 탄소사슬 (carbon chain): 주요 교역상대국들을 중심으로 한 다지역 산업연관분석", 「자원.환경경제연구」, 제24권 제1호, 2015, pp. 141~164.
  5. 오인하, "배출규제가 탄소누출에 미치는 영향 분석 및 전망: 소비 관점의 탄소회계와 국경조치의 영향을 중심으로", 「자원.환경경제연구」, 제21권 제4호, 2012, pp. 851~891.
  6. 통계청, Accessed 2022.09.30., https://kostat.go.kr
  7. Andrew, R. M., "Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data," Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018, pp. 195~217. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018
  8. Balogh, J. M., and A. JAimbor, "Determinants of CO2 emission: A global evidence," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2017, pp. 217~226.
  9. Davis, S. J., and K. Calderia, "Consumption-based Accounting of CO2 Emissions," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, No. 12, 2010, pp. 5687~5692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107
  10. Demailly, D., and P. Quirion, "European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2008a, pp. 2009~2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020
  11. Demailly, D., and P. Quirion, "Leakage from climate policies and border tax adjustment: lessons from a geographic model of the cement industry," The Design of Climate Policy, 2008b, pp. 333~358.
  12. Fernandez-Amador, O., J. F. Francois, and P. Tomberger, "MRIO linkages and Switzerland's CO2 profile," Aussenwirtschaft, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2016, pp. 47~63.
  13. Hanif, I., S. M. F. Raza, P. Gago-de-Santos, and Q. Abbas, "Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence," Energy, Vol. 171, 2019, pp. 493~501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011
  14. Lenzen, M., B. Gallego, and R. Wood., "Matrix Balancing under Conflicting Information," Economic Systems Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2009, pp. 23~44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802688661
  15. Lenzen, M., C. Dey, and B. Foran, "Energy requirements of Sydney households," Ecological Economics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2004, pp. 375~399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.019
  16. Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, and A. Geschke, "Building Eora: A Global Multi-regional Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution," Economic Systems Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2013, pp. 20~49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.769938
  17. Lenzen, M., K. Kanemoto, D. Moran, and A. Geschke, "Mapping the structure of the world economy," Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, No. 15, 2012, pp. 8374~8381. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300171x
  18. Mi, Z., Y. Zhang, D. Guan, Y. Shan, Z. Liu, R. Cong, X. C. Yuan, and Y. M. Wei, "Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Vol. 184, 2016, pp. 1073~1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.094
  19. Muhammad, S., and X. Long, "Rule of law and CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative (BRI) countries," Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 279, 2021, p. 123539.
  20. NET ZERO TRACKER, Accessed 2022.09.30., https://zerotracker.net/
  21. Owen, A., "Techniques for evaluating the differences in consumptionbased accounts - A comparative evaluation of Eora, GTAP and WIOD," The University of Leeds, 2017.
  22. Peters, G. P., S. J. Davis, and R. Andrew, "A synthesis of carbon in international trade," Biogeosciences, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2012, pp. 3247~3276. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3247-2012
  23. Ponssard, J. P., and N. Walker, "EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis," Climate Policy, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2008, pp. 467~493. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0500
  24. Purcel, A. A., "Does political stability hinder pollution? Evidence from developing states," Economic Research Guardian, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2019, pp. 75~98.
  25. Qin, L., M. Y. Malik, K. Latif, Z. Khan, A. W. Siddiqui, and S. Ali, "The salience of carbon leakage for climate action planning: Evidence from the next eleven countries," Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 27, 2021, pp. 1064~1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.019
  26. Rocco, M. V., N. Golinucci, S. M. Ronco, and E. Colombo, "Fighting carbon leakage through consumption-based carbon emissions policies: empirical analysis based on the world trade model with bilateral trades," Applied Energy, Vol. 274, 2020, p. 115301.
  27. Subak, S., "Methane embodied in the international trade of commodities: Implications for global emissions," Global Environmental Change, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1995, pp. 433~446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(95)00056-T
  28. The Eora Global Supply Chain Database, Accessed 2022.09.30., https://worldmrio.com
  29. Usubiaga, A., and J. Acosta-Fernandez, "CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING IN MRIO MODELS: THE TERRITORY VS. THE RESIDENCE PRINCIPLE," Economic Systems Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2015, pp. 458~477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1049126
  30. You, W., and Z. Lv, "Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach," Energy Economics, Vol. 73, 2018, pp. 248~257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016