정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제26권5호
  • /
  • Pages.385-396
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국가별 디지털 리터러시 교육 현황 탐색 및 시사점 분석

Implication analysis through exploring the current status of digital literacy education by country

  • 이영호 (대구교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Youngho Lee (Daegu National University of Education Dept. of Computer Education)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.16
  • 심사 : 2022.10.07
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2022 개정 교육과정에서는 언어, 수리, 디지털 소양을 구성요소로 하는 기초 소양을 강조하였으며, 그 중 디지털 소양을 함양하기 위해 모든 교과 교육을 통해 균형 있는 디지털 기초 소양 함양과 정보 교육과정과 연계한 방안을 제시하겠다고 하였다. 이러한 디지털 소양은 우리나라 뿐만 아니라 다양한 국가에서 디지털 리터러시 함양을 위한 목표로 교육과정에 제시되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 학생들의 디지털 리터러시가 높은 국가의 관련 교육 현황을 살펴보고, 국가별 학생들의 ICT 요소에 대한 PISA 2018 자료 분석을 실시하였다. 구체적으로 국가별 비교를 위한 ICT 요소별 일원배치 분산분석과 상관분석, 그리고 확인적 요인 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 디지털 리터러시와 관련된 교육과정을 편성할 때 현재보다 이른 시기로 편성할 필요가 있으며, 학교에서의 활용성을 높이기 위한 각 교과 및 정보 교육과정에서 내용에 대한 고려가 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

The 2022 revised curriculum emphasized basic literacy, which consists of language, numeracy, and digital literacy. This digital literacy is being presented in the curriculum as a goal for cultivating digital literacy in various countries. Therefore, this study looked at the curriculum of countries with high digital literacy among students. And PISA 2018 data analysis was conducted on ICT elements of students by country. Specifically, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were performed for each ICT element for country-by-country comparison. As a result, when organizing the curriculum related to digital literacy, it is necessary to organize it earlier than the present time. In addition, it was found that it was necessary to consider the contents to increase the usability in school.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek. K. S., Lee. Y. A., Lee. D. Y., Kim. S. H., Kim. D. S. (2013). An international comparative study on curriculum organization and class hours (Research Report CRC 2013-16). Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
  2. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  3. Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2020). English Language syllabus: Primary. Singapore: Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/primary/2020-english-language-prima ry.pdf?la=en&hash=41B5904DF5A4AF8D015EB4DE09DE69E7205382CC [Accessed 2 August 2022].
  4. Cyber wellness. (2022). Retrieved 2 August 2022, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education-in-sg/ou r-programmes/cyber-wellness
  5. F-10 curriculum. (2022). Retrieved 2 August 2022, from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/
  6. Han, S. H., Oh, S. S. (2020). The effect of media education on the social consciousness of youth. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 10(3), 1-20.
  7. Hong. S. H. (2000). Criteria for selecting the fitness index of the structural equation model and its basis. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
  8. Kang. E. J., Kim. A. M., Lee. J. W. (2022). Exploring the elements of digital and media literacy in early childhood education in Finland, Canada and Australia. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Children's Association, 77-78.
  9. Kim G. S. (2017). A Study on ICT Accessibility and Utilization among OECD Countries and Korean Students-Focused on Data from 2015. Journal of the Information Education Association, 21(3), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.361
  10. Kim, S. G., Yoo, J. W., Baek, B. H. (2020). The effect of science class emphasizing digital literacy on science attitude and core competency growth perception of first-year middle school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Science Education, 40(2), 227-236.
  11. Kim, S. H., Kim, J. H., Kim, H. Y., Lee, W. J., Park, I. J., Kim, M. E., Kye, B. K. (2017). A study on application of the curriculum of digital literacy. KERIS Report KR, 4
  12. Kim. G. S. (2015). Comparative Study of PISA ICT Ability of Korean Students-2009 and 2012. Journal of Information Education Association, 19(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.233
  13. Kim. H. S. (2012). The effect of ICT use on academic achievement: Focusing on PISA 2009 Korean data. Asian Journal of Education, 13.
  14. Kim. H. S., Kim. H. S., Kim. J. S., Shin. A. N. (2017). Trend analysis of ICT access and use level of Korean students using OECD PISA data. Informatization P olicy, 24(4), 17-43.
  15. Kim. J. H. (2015). A comparative study on the status of school informatization in OECD countries through the analysis of the PISA ICT survey. Educational Information and Media Research, 21(3), 493-520.
  16. Kim. S. H. (2021). Analysis of the content element range and arrangement method by grade in the elementary school digital literacy curriculum. Ewha Womans University Master's thesis.
  17. Kim. S. H., Shin. H. S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between digital literacy education status of secondary school teachers in 7 OECD countries and educational use of ICT-Based on PISA 2018 data analysis. Cultural Exchange and Multicultural Education (Former Cultural Exchange Research), 9(2), 71-97.
  18. Kim. Y. R. (2019). Overseas cases and implications of media literacy in the digital age. NARS Issue Analysis, 90.
  19. Korea Information Society Agency. (2019). Institutions and programs for digital citizenship education in Singapore. Beautiful Internet World Trends Report, 60.
  20. Lee. Y. H. (2021). Analysis of research trends in elementary information education according to changes in the curriculum. Journal of Information Education Association, 25(3), 537-545. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.3.537
  21. Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea (2022). Retrieved 1 August 2022, from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  22. Noh. E. H., Shin. S. J., & Lee. J. J. (2019). An analysis of the perceptions of elementary and middle school teachers on digital literacy education. Curriculum Evaluation Research, 22(3), 31-60.
  23. OECD (2021), 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en.
  24. Park. H. N., Jin. M. H., Park. J. W., Lim. G. Y. (2021). Analysis of domestic and international digital literacy curriculum. Educational Culture Research, 27(5), 75-101.
  25. Seo. S. H. (2022). Digital literacy acceptance plan to enhance the scalability of the writing curriculum. Composition Studies, 52, 45-77.
  26. So. K. H, Jang. J. K., Lee. S. Y. (2011). The development process and key features of the Australian National Curriculum. Comparative Education Research, 21(2), 51-73.