Journal of Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회지)

The Society for Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Status and Prospect of the Korean Space Industrial Structure

국내 우주산업구조의 현황과 전망

  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2022.03.29
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the supply and demand structure of the domestic space industry through analysis of industrial concentration index, by sector and dependence on revenue by customer type. As a result of industrial concentration analysis, in the case of space application, a supply monopoly or oligopoly structure was revealed in fields such as satellite broadcasting, space insurance, and satellite navigation. In the field of space equipment manufacturing, referred to as the traditional space industry, a supply monopoly structure appeared only in the field of launch pads and test facilities. As a result of analyzing the dependence on revenue by customer type, the dependence on the demand in the space application field is diversified among foreign countries, private institutions, and others. However, in the case of space equipment manufacturing, it is highly dependent on the demand of public institutions, and it seems that there is a monopsony structure.

본 연구에서는 분야별 산업집중도와 고객유형별 매출집중도를 통해 국내 우주산업의 공급 및 수요구조를 분석하였다. 산업집중도 분석 결과 우주활용 분야의 경우 위성방송, 우주보험, 위성항법 등 분야에서 공급 독과점 구조가 나타난 반면, 전통적인 우주산업이라 할 수 있는 우주기기제작 분야에서는 발사대 및 시험시설 분야에서만 공급 독과점 구조가 나타났다. 한편 고객유형별 매출액을 다중회귀분석 한 결과 우주활용 분야에서는 해외, 민간기관, 기타 등으로 수요가 다각화된 반면, 우주기기제작 분야의 경우 공공기관과 민간기관 수요에 집중되어 공공기관을 중심으로 수요독점 구조가 예상된다. 국내 우주산업 구조의 현황과 전망, 정책적 시사점에 대해 논의한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 11월 3일 개최된 2021년도 항공우주시스템공학회 추계학술대회에서 발표한 내용에 기초한 것이다.

References

  1. Bain, Joe. S, "Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940," Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 65, no.3, pp. 293-324, Aug 1951. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882217
  2. Schmalensee, R. "Inter-industry studies of structure and performance," in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, North Holland, New York, pp. 952-1009, Sep 1989.
  3. G. H. Lee "Market Structure and Market Performance in the Korean Manufacturing Industries: Panel Data Approach, Market Structure and Market Performance in the Korean Manufacturing Industries: Panel Data Approach, Economic Analysis, Vol. 14, no4, Economic Research Institute, pp112-133 Dec 2006.
  4. J. P. Choi, S. M. Jeon, "Buyer Concentration and Structure-Performance Relationship in Korean Manufacturing Industries," The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 21, pp.63-86, Aug 2013.
  5. L. Pepall, D. Richards, G, Norman, Industrial Organization: Contemporary Theory and Empirical Application, 4th Ed., Academy Press, Seoul, 2015.
  6. Demsetz, H., "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy," Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 16, no. 1, pp.1-9, Apr 1973. https://doi.org/10.1086/466752
  7. Ministry of Science and ICT, Space Industry Survey in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020.
  8. OECD, Space and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2016.
  9. J. H. Lee, J. S. Yang, S. M. Lee, Market Structure Research, KDI, pp. 23-26, Dec 2017.
  10. H. G. Park, H. Y, Song, J. K, Sim, "A Study on the Strategy for Domestic Space Industry Activation," KISTEP, pp. 106, Dec 2013.
  11. Ministry of Science and ICT, Partial amendment to the Space Development Promotion Ace(draft), Aug 2021.
  12. J. H. Kim, Y. S, Ann, W. J. Jang, "Economic Analysis of the Characteristics of the Defense Industry and Policy Implications," KEIT Industrial Economy, May 2012.