DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Improvement of China's Nuclear Safety Supervision Technical Support Ability

  • Han Wu (The Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of MEE) ;
  • Guoxin Yu (The Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of MEE) ;
  • Xiangyang Zheng (The Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of MEE) ;
  • Keyan Teng (The Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of MEE)
  • Received : 2022.07.24
  • Accepted : 2022.10.04
  • Published : 2022.12.30

Abstract

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) entails independent decision-making for the safety supervision of civil nuclear facilities. To evaluate and review the safety of nuclear facilities, the national regulatory body usually consults independent institutions or external committees. Technical Support Organizations (TSOs) include national laboratories, research institutions, and consulting organizations. Support from professional organizations in other countries may also be required occasionally. Most of the world's major nuclear power countries adopt an independent nuclear safety supervision model. Accordingly, China has continuously improved upon the construction of such a system by establishing the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) as the decision-making department for nuclear and radiation safety supervision, six regional safety supervision stations, the Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center (NSC), a nuclear safety expert committee, and the National Nuclear and Radiation Safety Supervision Technology R&D Base, which serves as the test, verification, and R&D platform for providing consultation and technical support. An R&D system, however, remains to be formed. Future endeavors must focus on improving the technical support capacity of these systems. As an enhancement from institutional independence to capability independence is necessary for ensuring the independence of China's nuclear safety regulatory institution, its regulatory capacity must be improved in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. L. Qiwei, "IAEA Requirements on Independence in Regulatory Decision Making of Nuclear Safety and Its Enlightenment", Environ. Prot., 49(5), 76-79 (2021). 
  2. L. Qing, "Development and Characteristics of American Nuclear Safety Management Model", World Environ., 24(3), 38-39 (2014). 
  3. W. Haixia, C. Zhibin, L.Yazhou, S. Xiniyuan, J. Jieqiong, H. Liqin, Y. Jie, and W. Yican, "Preliminary Study of the Status of Fusion Safety Regulation and Licensing", Chin. J. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 36(4), 497-503 (2016). 
  4. Y. Su, X. Lin, J. Ji, and X. Ma, "Role of Economic Structural Change in the Peaking of China's CO2 Emissions: An Input-Output Optimization Model", Sci. Total Environ., 761, 143306 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143306
  5. W. Yong and W. Yin, "Feasibility and Optimal Pathway of China's Double Targets for Carbon Reduction: The Perspective of Energy Structure Optimization", China Environ. Sci., 39(10), 4444-4455 (2019). 
  6. Z. Wei and M. Hong, "Calculation on Energy-related CO2 Emissions in China (2010-2050)", China Environ. Sci., 30(8), 1142-1148 (2010). 
  7. D. Ma and W. Chen, "Analysis of China's 2030 Carbon Emissions Peak Level and Peak Path", China Popul. Resour. Environ., 26(S1), 1-4 (2016). 
  8. Y. Wu, J.Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, D. Xia, F. Wang, T. Zhou, and L. Hu, "Investigation and Proposals for China's Nuclear Safety Regulations", Sci. Sin. Technol., 50(8), 1009-1018 (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1360/sst-2019-0426
  9. H. Wang and J. Rong, "Analysis on China's Nuclear Energy Development Path Under the Goal of Peaking Carbon Emissions and Achieving Carbon Neutrality", Electr. Power, 54(6), 86-94 (2021).