DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Model to Evaluate Thermal Fluid Flow Around a Submerged Transportation Cask of Spent Nuclear Fuel in the Deep Sea

  • Received : 2022.11.10
  • Accepted : 2022.12.06
  • Published : 2022.12.30

Abstract

Given the domestic situation, all nuclear power plants are located at the seaside, where interim storage sites are also likely to be located and maritime transportation is considered inevitable. Currently, Korea does not have an independently developed maritime transportation risk assessment code, and no research has been conducted to evaluate the release rate of radioactive waste from a submerged transportation cask in the sea. Therefore, secure technology is necessary to assess the impact of immersion accidents and establish a regulatory framework to assess, mitigate, and prevent maritime transportation accidents causing serious radiological consequences. The flow rate through a gap in a containment boundary should be calculated to determine the accurate release rate of radionuclides. The fluid flow through the micro-scale gap can be evaluated by combining the flow inside and outside the transportation cask. In this study, detailed computational fluid dynamic and simplified models are constructed to evaluate the internal flow in a transportation cask and to capture the flow and heat transfer around the transportation cask in the sea, respectively. In the future, fluid flow through the gap will be evaluated by coupling the models developed in this study.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using the financial resource granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 2106042).

References

  1. Public Data Portal Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. October 26 2022. "Status of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage by Nuclear Power Plant." Public Data Portal. Accessed Oct. 30 2022. Available from: https://www.data.go.kr/data/15060363/fileData.do. 
  2. Korea Atomic Industry Forum. "Status of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea." KAIF. Accessed Oct. 25 2022. Available from: https://www.kaif.or.kr/ko/ko/?c=189&s=188. 
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-6 (Rev.1) (2018). 
  4. Notice of Nuclear Safety Commission, Regulations on Packaging and Transport of Radioactive Materials, etc., No. 2011-49, NSC, Korea (2011). 
  5. K.J. Connolly and R.B. Pope, A Historical Review of the Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel, FCRD-NFST-2016-000474, US Department of Energy (2016). 
  6. J. Edwards, A. Hough, J.A.C. Marples, and T. Ohe, "Leaching of Unirradiated Mox Fuel in Sea Water", Int. J. Radioac. Mater. Transp., 9(2), 147-156 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1179/rmt.1998.9.2.147
  7. D. Tsumune, T. Tsubono, K. Misumi, and Y. Yoshida, "Estimation of the Radiation Dose Equivalent for the Hypothetical Submergence of a Sea-Transport Package of Low-level Radioactive Waste", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 54(6), 681-693 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1299647
  8. D. Tsumune, T. Saegusa, H. Suzuki, N. Watabe, H. Asano, K. Maruyama, and Y. Kinehara, "Dose Assessment for the Public Due to Packages Shipping Radioactive Materials Hypothetically Sunk on a Continental Shelf", Int. J. Radioac. Mater. Transp., 11(4), 317-328 (2000). 
  9. D. Tsumune, T. Saegusa, H. Suzuki, K. Maruyama, C. Ito, and N. Watabe, "Estimated Radiation Dose From a Mox Fuel Shipping Package That is Hypothetically Submerged Into Sea", Int. J. Radioac. Mater. Transp., 11(3), 239-253 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1179/rmt.2000.11.3.239
  10. D.K. Cho, J. Kim, I.Y. Kim, and J.Y. Lee, "Investigation of PWR Spent Fuels for the Design of a Deep Geological Repository", J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol., 17(3), 339-346 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2019.17.3.339
  11. R.H. Bahney and T.L. Lotz. Spent Nuclear Fuel Effective Thermal Conductivity Report, US Department of Energy Technical Report, BBA000000-01717-5705-00010 REV 00 (1996). 
  12. B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding, "The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3(2), 269-289 (1974).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
  13. Bechtel SAIC Company, Characteristics for the Representative Commercial Spent Fuel Assembly for Preclosure Normal Operations, 000-PSA-MGR0-00700-000-00A (2007). 
  14. O.M. Elmardi, Solution to Problems in Heat Transfer Transient Conduction or Unsteady Conduction, Anchor Academic Publishing, Hamburg (2017). 
  15. International Atomic Energy Agency, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, Safety Requirements No. TS-R-1 (2005). 
  16. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Sec.II Part D Properties, United States (2015). 
  17. Holtec International. Safety Analysis Report the HI-STAR 63 Package, Holtec Report, HI-2073777 (2009). 
  18. A. Bejan, Convection Heat Transfer, 4th Ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey (2013). 
  19. Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials. Development of Process Technology and Design of Al Composite Materials for Neutron Shielding, KIMM Report, UCN-5203.C (2019). 
  20. H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford (1959). 
  21. E.M. John, An Introduction to Ansys Fluent 2022, SDC Publication, Kansas (2022). 
  22. F.R. Menter, "Zonal Two Equation k-ω Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows", Proc. of 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, AIAA-93-2906, AIAA, Orlando, FL (1993). 
  23. F.R. Menter, "Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications", AIAA J., 32(8), 1598-1605 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  24. J. Paik and N.J. Lee, "Numerical Modeling of Free Surface Flow Over a Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir", J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc., 48(4), 281-290 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2015.48.4.281
  25. V.K. Th, Mechanische Ahnlichkeit und Turbulenz, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 58-76 (1930).