Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Smart City Policy Promotion and Gyeonggi-do Strategy

스마트시티 정책추진과 경기도 광역자치단체 전략

  • Kim, Myung Jin (Policy Research Division, Gyeonggido Business & Science Accelerator)
  • Received : 2022.02.11
  • Accepted : 2022.04.20
  • Published : 2022.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of Gyeonggi provincial governments in smart city policy. In order to satisfy the purpose of the study, we closely identified how may local governments(si. gun) have been taking participated in smart city project of the central government, and its characteristics. Then we know the detailed strategies that Gyeonggi provincial governments should do. Gyeonggi-do provincial governments enacted smart city-related ordinances in 2020 and participated in the Smart City Local Council. In the future, Gyeonggi privincial government will propose amendments to the law, review participation in the central government smart city policy project, the "integrated platform construction project of the metropolitan government model", and propel Gyeonggi-do's own smart city policy based on the blind spots of the policy.

본 연구에서는 중앙정부가 추진하는 스마트시티 정책에서 경기도 광역자치단체의 역할을 알아보고자 한다. 이를 위해 중앙정부 중심으로 추진되고 있는 스마트시티 정책 사업에 도내 기초지자체의 참여현황을 파악해보고 특성을 도출하여 경기도 광역자치단체가 마련해야 하는 세부과제를 제시한다. 현재 경기도 지역은 U-City 이후에 도내 기초지자체가 제도적 기반을 마련하고 중앙정부 스마트시티 정책사업에 참여하고 있다. 경기도 광역자치단체는 2020년에 스마트시티 관련 조례를 제정하고 스마트도시 지방자치단체 협의회에 참가하는 정도이다. 향후 경기도는 법 개정을 건의하여 스마트시티 정책추진의 동력을 확보하고 경기도만의 거버넌스를 확립하여 효율적인 정책추진을 위한 체계마련을 고민한다. 또한 중앙정부 스마트시티 정책사업에 "광역자치단체 모델의 통합플랫폼 구축사업" 참여를 검토하여 재난 안전상황에 효율적으로 대응할 수 있는 시스템을 마련하고, 정책의 사각지대를 중심으로 경기도 독자적인 스마트시티 정책추진을 검토해본다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 과학기술정보통신부의 재원으로 연구개발특구진흥재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(No. 2022-DD-UP-0288, 2022년 경기연구개발지원단 육성지원사업).

References

  1. European Commission. (2016). Analysing the potential for wide scale roll out of integrated Smart Cities and Communities Solutions.
  2. MOLIT.KAIA.(2016). Smart city overseas expansion platform construction research and planning.
  3. KIEP.(2018). 4th Industrial Revolution Promotion Strategies and Cooperation Measures of Major Asian Countries: Focusing on China, India and Singapore, Sejong.
  4. 4th Industrial Revolution Committee. (2018). Smart City Promotion Strategy for Urban Innovation and Creation of Future Growth Engines.
  5. Act on Construction of Ubiquitous City (U-City Act)(2008.3.28.)
  6. Smart City Creation and Industry Promotion Act (Smart City Act)(2017.3.21.)
  7. J. Y. Lee and S. H. Han.(2017). The Meanings and Future Agendas of the Act on Smart City Law Revision. The journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 20(3), 91-101. DOI : 10.21189/JKUGS.22.2.1
  8. H.Y. Jang and K. Kim. (2019). A Study on the Revision Directions of Municipal Ordinance through the Issue Analyses of Smart Cities. The journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 13-22. DOI : 10.21189/JKUGS.22.2.2
  9. J.Y. Lee and S.H. Han. (2019). An Investigation of a Smart City Policy Change and Local Government Response. The journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 1-11. DOI : 10.21189/JKUGS.22.2.1
  10. B.S. Kim, K. Kim, S.Y. Lee and H.Y. Jang. (2019). The Smart City Level and Future Agenda in Goyang City. The journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.22.2.4
  11. Y.C. Kim and H.T. Yang. (2021). A Study on User Preference for Smart City Non-face-to-face Services: Focusing on the Cases of Sejong City and Busan City. Information Systems Review, 23(4), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2021.23.4.087
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2019). The 3rd Smart City Comprehensive Plan ('19~'23).
  13. Smart City Korea Comprehensive Portal (www.smartcity.go.kr)
  14. M.J. Kim. (2021). Smart City Policy Promotion and Gyeonggi Province's Tasks, GBSA Policy Focus, No 5. Gyeonggi.
  15. Local governments promoting smart city policies… The speed of progress is 'every different'.(2021. 5. 7.) Kihoilbo.
  16. "Local cost matching burden" Smart city is difficult to achieve. (2021.5.10.) Joongbooilbo.
  17. Gyeonggi-do Smart City Creation and Industry Support Ordinance(2020.1.13.)
  18. T.W. Nam and H.S. Choi.(2019). Platform Governance for Smart Cities: Cases of Barcelona, Stockholm, and Copenhagen. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 32(4), 21-39. DOI : 10.3670/KRUMA.2019.12.32.4.21
  19. S.H. Lee and Y.T. Lee.(2016). Analyzing Characteristics of the Smart City Governance. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 19(2), 86-97. DOI : 10.1108/kagis.2016.19.2.086
  20. H.Y. Jang and N.G. Kim.(2017). A Study on Smart City Governance and Collaboration Direction of Government Departments : Focus on MOLIT and MSIP, International Journal of Contents, 17(5), 430-439 DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.05.430
  21. K.W. Nam.(2017). A Study on Smart City Governance Vitalization Plan. Busan : Busan Development Institute
  22. M.J. Kim. (2020). A Study on Understanding of Policy Demand for Fostering Gyeonggi Smart City. The journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 23(1), 59-69. DOI : 10.21189/JKUGS.23.1.5