Animal Bioscience

  • 제35권5호
  • /
  • Pages.648-658
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear mixed models for characterization of growth trajectory of New Zealand rabbits raised in tropical climate

  • 투고 : 2020.09.02
  • 심사 : 2020.12.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The identification of nonlinear mixed models that describe the growth trajectory of New Zealand rabbits was performed based on weight records and carcass measures obtained using ultrasonography. Methods: Phenotypic records of body weight (BW) and loin eye area (LEA) were collected from 66 animals raised in a didactic-productive module of cuniculture located in the southern Piaui state, Brazil. The following nonlinear models were tested considering fixed parameters: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, Meloun 1, modified Michaelis-Menten, Santana, and von Bertalanffy. The coefficient of determination (R2), mean squared error, percentage of convergence of each model (%C), mean absolute deviation of residuals, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to determine the best model. The model that best described the growth trajectory for each trait was also used under the context of mixed models, considering two parameters that admit biological interpretation (A and k) with random effects. Results: The von Bertalanffy model was the best fitting model for BW according to the highest value of R2 (0.98) and lowest values of AIC (6,675.30) and BIC (6,691.90). For LEA, the Logistic model was the most appropriate due to the results of R2 (0.52), AIC (783.90), and BIC (798.40) obtained using this model. The absolute growth rates estimated using the von Bertalanffy and Logistic models for BW and LEA were 21.51g/d and 3.16 cm2, respectively. The relative growth rates at the inflection point were 0.028 for BW (von Bertalanffy) and 0.014 for LEA (Logistic). Conclusion: The von Bertalanffy and Logistic models with random effect at the asymptotic weight are recommended for analysis of ponderal and carcass growth trajectories in New Zealand rabbits. The inclusion of random effects in the asymptotic weight and maturity rate improves the quality of fit in comparison to fixed models.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank the Foundation for Support to Research of Piaui (FAPEPI), which granted a scholarship to the first author, and the Federal University of Piaui (UFPI) for providing the material and structure necessary to conduct this study. This study was also partially funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

참고문헌

  1. Amer SA, Omar AE, Abd El-Hack, ME. Effects of selenium-and chromium-enriched diets on growth performance, lipid profile, and mineral concentration in different tissues of growing rabbits. Biol Trace Elem Res 2019;187:92-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1356-4
  2. Szendro K, Szabo-Szentgroti E, Szigeti O. Consumers' attitude to consumption of rabbit meat in eight countries depending on the production method and its purchase form. Foods 2020;9:654. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050654
  3. Souza LA, Carneiro PLS, Malhado CHM, Silva FF, Silveira FG. Traditional and alternative nonlinear models for estimating the growth of Morada Nova sheep. R Bras Zootec 2013;42:651-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982013000900007
  4. Silva MJFB, Lins LF, Lins NBO, et al. Bovine carcass evaluation: a review about the use of the ultrasound. Med Vet (UFRPE) 2017;11:279-84. https://doi.org/10.26605/medvetn4-1961
  5. Suguisawa L, Marques ACW, Bardi AE, Fausto D. Utilization of ultrasonography as a tool for standardization of commercial carcasses. Tecnol Cien Agropec 2009;3:55-65.
  6. Jung JH, Shim KS, Na CS, Choe HS. Studies on intramuscular fat percentage in live swine using real-time ultrasound to determine pork quality. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:318-22. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0927
  7. Brody S. Bioenergetics and growth: with special reference to the efficiency complex in domestic animals. Baltimore, MD, USA: Reinhold Publishing Corporation, Waverly Press; 1945. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330040117
  8. von Bertalanffy L. Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. Q Rev Biol 1957;32:217-31. https://doi.org/10.1086/401873
  9. Richards FJ. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 1959;10:290-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/10.2.290
  10. Nelder JA. The fitting of a generalization of the logistic curve. Biometrics 1961;17:89-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527498
  11. Laird AK. Dynamics of relative growth. Growth 1965;29:249-63.
  12. Meloun M, Militky J. Statistical processing of experimental data: collection of tasks (with diskette). Pardubice, Czech Republic: Univerzita Pardubice; 1996.
  13. Lopez S, France J, Gerrits WJ, Dhanoa MS, Humphries DJ, Dijkstra J. A generalized Michaelis-Menten equation for the analysis of growth. J Anim Sci 2000;78:1816-28. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7871816x
  14. Santana TJS. New growth curve models for beef cattle [PhD thesis]. Lavras, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras; 2013. http://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/1152
  15. Sarmento JLR, Regazzi AJ, Sousa WH, Torres RA, Breda FC, Menezes GRO. Analysis of the growth curve of Santa Ines sheep. R Bras Zootec 2006;35:435-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000200014
  16. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 14.1 user's guide: The NLMIXED Procedure. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2015.
  17. Dalle Zotte A. Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livest Prod Sci 2002;75:11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226(01)00308-6
  18. Metzger S, Odermatt M, Szabo A, et al. Effect of age and body weight on carcass traits and meat composition of rabbits. Arch Anim Breed 2011;54:406-18. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-54-406-2011
  19. Teixeira Neto MR, Cruz JF, Faria HHN, Souza ES, Carneiro PLS, Malhado CHM. Description of Santa Ines sheep growth using non-linear models selected by multivariate analysis. R Bras Saude Prod Anim 2016;17:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402016000100003
  20. Mohammed FA. Comparison of three nonlinear functions for describing chicken growth curves. Sci Agric 2015;9:120-3.
  21. Adenaike AS, Akpan U, Udoh JE, et al. Comparative evaluation of growth functions in three broiler strains of Nigerian chickens. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 2017;40:611-20.
  22. Carneiro PLS, Malhado CHM, Afonso PRAM, et al. Growth curve in Mambrina goats raised in caatinga. R Bras Saude Prod Anim 2009;10:536-45.
  23. Teixeira MC, Villarroel AB, Pereira ES, Oliveira SMP, Albuquerque IA, Mizubuti IY. Growth curve of lambs from three systems of production in Northeastern Brazil. Semin Cienc Agrar 2012;33:2011-8. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p2011
  24. Santos DCE, Sousa CA, Silva ES, et al. Comparison of nonlinear models adjustment in New Zealand rabbits growth curve. 55th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Animal Science (SBZ)/28th Conference of Animal Science (Zootec)/6th American Rabbit Congress; 2018 August 27-30; Goiania, GO, Brazil. http://www.adaltech.com.br/anais/zootecnia2018/resumos/trab-1694.pdf
  25. Ferreira DSA, Santos ALP, Freitas JR, et al. New non-linear model to describe growth curves of New Zealand rabbits. Sigmae 2019;8:522-31.
  26. Ferreira WM, Machado LC, Jaruche YG, et al. Practical handbook of rabbit production. Bambui, MG, Brazil: Edition of the author; 2012. http://world-rabbit-science.com/Developping/Fichiers-pdf/Manual-pratico-de-cunicultura-2012.pdf
  27. Freitas AR. Growth curves in animal production. R Bras Zootec 2005;34:786-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000300010
  28. Wang Z, Goonewardene LA. The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data. Can J Anim Sci 2004;84:1-11. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3GK4K
  29. Ibiapina Neto V, Barbosa FJV, Campelo JEG, Sarmento JLR. Non-linear mixed models in the study of growth of naturalized chickens. R Bras Zootec 2020;49:e20190201. https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190201
  30. Huang K, Walker CA. Comparisons of statistical models for growth curves from 90-day rat feeding studies. Arch Toxicol 2019;93:2397-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02496-5