DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Input Material Accounting Uncertainty With Double-Stage Homogenization in Pyroprocessing

  • Received : 2021.09.28
  • Accepted : 2021.12.13
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

Pyroprocessing is a promising technology for managing spent nuclear fuel. The nuclear material accounting of feed material is a challenging issue in safeguarding pyroprocessing facilities. The input material in pyroprocessing is in a solid-state, unlike the solution state in an input accountability tank used in conventional wet-type reprocessing. To reduce the uncertainty of the input material accounting, a double-stage homogenization process is proposed in considering the process throughput, remote controllability, and remote maintenance of an engineering-scale pyroprocessing facility. This study tests two types of mixing equipment in the proposed double-stage homogenization process using surrogate materials. The expected heterogeneity and accounting uncertainty of Pu are calculated based on the surrogate test results. The heterogeneity of Pu was 0.584% obtained from Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) spent fuel of 59 WGd/tU when the relative standard deviation of the mass ratio, tested from the surrogate powder, is 1%. The uncertainty of the Pu accounting can be lower than 1% when the uncertainty of the spent fuel mass charged into the first mixers is 2%, and the uncertainty of the first sampling mass is 5%.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was partly supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2021M2A7A1080748 and 2021M2E3A3040093).

References

  1. T. Inoue and L. Koch, "Development of Pyroprocessing and its Future Direction", Nucl. Eng. Technol., 40(3), 183-190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2008.40.3.183
  2. T. Inoue, H. Ohta, T. Yokoo, and L. Koch, "Fuel Cycle With Pyro-process From the Perspective of Resisting Proliferation", Proc. of the International Conference on Nuclear Energy Systems for Future Generation and Global Sustainability: GLOBAL 2005, 2562, October 9-13, 2005, Tsukuba, Ibaraki.
  3. H.S. Lee, G.I. Park, K.H. Kang, J.M. Hur, J.G. Kim, D.H. Ahn, Y.Z. Cho, and E.H. Kim, "Pyroprocessing Technology Development at KAERI", Nucl. Eng. Technol., 43(4), 317-328 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2011.43.4.317
  4. M. Suzuki, M. Hori, S. Nagaoka, and T. Kimura, "Study on Loss Detection Algorithms Using Tank Monitoring Data", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 46(2), 184-192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.46.184
  5. H.S. Shin, S.K. Ahn, D.Y. Song, T.H. Lee, H.D. Kim, J.S. Seo, H.I. Im, and J.N. Jang. Analysis of the Present Status of Conceptually Designed Pyroprocessing Facilities for Determining a Reference Pyroprocessing Facility, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Report, KAERI/TR-3985/2009 (2009).
  6. B.Y. Han, H.S. Shin, and H.D. Kim, "Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty of Material Unaccounted for in the Reference Pyroprocessing Facility", Nucl. Technol., 182(3), 369-377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13182/nt13-a16986
  7. S.K. Ahn, C.S. Seo, E. Kwon, and H.D. Kim, "Linkage Options Between Unit Process to Enhance Proliferation Resistance of Pyroprocessing", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 75, 184-188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.001
  8. R. Hogg, "Mixing and Segregation in Powders: Evaluation, Mechanisms and Processes", KONA Powder Part. J., 27, 3-17 (2009). https://doi.org/10.14356/kona.2009005
  9. J.M. Ottino and D.V. Khakhar, "Mixing and Segregation of Granular Materials", Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32, 55-91 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.55
  10. P.M.C. Lacey, "Developments in the Theory of Particle Mixing", J. Appl. Chem., 4(5), 257-268 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5010040504
  11. R. Hogg, "Characterization of Relative Homogeneity in Particulate Mixtures", Int. J. Miner. Process., 72(1-4), 477-487 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00121-2
  12. B.Y. Han, S.H. Na, S.H. Park, H.D. Kim, D.Y. Lee, Y.S. Lee, J.M. Shin, and G. Park, "Measurement of Homogeneity of U and Pu Isotopes in PWR Spent Fuel Powder Mixture", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 51(10), 1205-1211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.915202
  13. C.B. Lee and Y.H. Jung, "An Attempt to Explain the High Burnup Structure Formation Mechanism in UO2 Fuel", J. Nucl. Mater., 279(2-3), 207-215 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00021-0
  14. C.B. Lee, D.H. Kim, J.S. Song, J.G. Bang, and Y.H. Jung, "RAPID Model to Predict Radial Burnup Distribution in LWR UO2 Fuel", J. Nucl. Mater., 282(2-3), 196-204 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00408-6
  15. K. Zhao, M. Penkin, C. Norman, S. Balsley, K. Mayer, P. Peerani, C. Pietri, S. Tapodi, Y. Tsutaki, M. Boella, G. Renha Jr., and E. Kuhn. International Target Values 2010 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Material, International Atomic Energy Agency Report, STR-368 (2010).