DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Physical Habitat and the Fish Community in Korea Stream

  • Hur, Jun Wook (Department of Aquaculture and Aquatic Science, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Joo, Jin Chul (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Choi, Byungwoong (Yeongsan River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.27
  • 심사 : 2022.03.08
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31

초록

The purpose of this study is to provide essential data necessary to assess ecological flow requirements by understanding habitat conditions for fish species through monitoring an ecological environment in the Korea stream (Dal Stream) and building related database. On-site surveys were conducted for identifying ecological and habitat conditions at the four monitoring sites. Fish sampling was carried out at the selected four sites (St.) during the period ranging from September, 2008 to September, 2009. At the four sampling sites, we measured water surface elevation, depth and velocity at the cross-sections. Optimal Ecological Flowrates (OEFs) were estimated using the Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) established for four fish species Zacco koreanus (St.1), Pungtungia herzi (St.2), Coreoleuciscus splendidus (St.3), and Zacco platypus (St.4) selected as icon species using the Physical HABitat SIMulation system (PHABSIM). Eighteen species (56.3%) including Odontobutis interrupta, Coreoperca herzi and C. splendidus were found endemic out of the 32 species in eight families sampled during this study period. The endangered species was collected Acheilognathus signifier, Pseudopungtungia tenuicorpa and Gobiobotia macrocephala, and this relative abundance was 9.4%. The most frequently found one was Z. platypus (31.3%) followed by C. splendidus (17.6%) and Z. koreanus (15.7%). The estimated IBI values ranged from 27.3 to 34.3 with average being 30.3 out of 50, rendering the site ecologically poor to fair health conditions. For C. splendidus (St.3), the dominant fish species in the stream, the favored habitat conditions were estimated to be 0.3-0.5 m for water depth, 0.4-0.7 m/s for flow velocity and sand-cobbles for substrate size, respectively. An OEFs of 8.5 m3/s was recommended for the representative fish species at the St.3.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIER-2021-01-01-044).

참고문헌

  1. Booker, D.J. and Dunbar, M.J. 2004. Application of physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) modelling to modified urban river channels. River Research and Applications 20(2): 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.742
  2. Cereghino, R. and Lavandier, P. 1998. Influence of hydropeaking on the distribution and larval development of the Plecoptera from a mountain stream. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199805/06)14:3<297::AID-RRR503>3.0.CO;2-X
  3. Choi, B. and Choi, S.-U. 2018. Impact of hydropeaking and thermopeaking on the downstream habitat in the Dal River, Korea, Ecological Informatics 43: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.016
  4. Choi, K.C., Choi, S.S., and Hong, Y.P. 1990. On the microdistribution of fresh-water fish, Coreoleuciscus splendidus (Gobioninae) from Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 2: 63-76. (In Korean)
  5. Choi, S.S. and Byeon, H.G. 2009. The fish fauna and community of Gwangneung arboretum. Korean J. Limnol. 42: 145-152. (In Korean)
  6. Gordon, N.D., McMahon, T.A., and Finlatson, B.L. 1993. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  7. Hur, J.W. and Kim, J.K. 2009. Assessment of riverine health condition and estimation of optimal ecological flowrate considering fish habitat in downstream of Yongdam dam. J. Korea Water Res. Assoc. 42: 481-491. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.6.481
  8. Hur, J.W. and Seo, J.W. 2011. Investigation on physical habitat condition of Korean chub (Zacco koreanus) in typical streams of the Han River. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 20: 207-215. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2011.20.2.207
  9. Im, D., Choi, S.U., and Choi, B. 2018. Physical habitat simulation for a fish community using the ANFIS method. Ecological Informatics 43: 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.09.001
  10. Jeon, S.R. 1980. Studies on the distribution of freshwater fishes from Korea. Ph.D. Thesis, Choongang Univ. pp. 91. (In Korean)
  11. Kang, H. and Choi, B. 2018. Dominant Fish and Macroinvertebrate Response to Flow Changes of the Geum River in Korea. Water 10(7): 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070942
  12. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fishieries 6: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  13. Karr, J.R., Fausch, K.D., Angermeier, P.L., Yant, P.R., and Schlosser, I.J. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running water: a method and its rationale. Illinois national history survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign, IL, pp. 28
  14. Kim, I.S. 1997. Encyclopedia of Korean animals and plants. Animal (Freshwater fish), pp. 629. (In Korean)
  15. Kim, I.S. and Park, J.Y. 2002. Freshwater Fish of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co, Seoul, Korea (In Korean)
  16. Kim, I.S., Choi, Y., Lee, C.L., Lee, Y.J., Kim, B.J., and Kim, J.H. 2005. Illustrated book of Korean fishes. Kyohak Publishing Co. Ltd., pp. 613. (In Korean)
  17. Lee, C.L. 2001. Ichthyofauna and fish community from the Gap Stream water system, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 19: 292-301. (In Korean)
  18. Lee, S., Kim, J.C., and Hur, J.W. 2012. Assessment of ecological flowrate by flow duration and environmental management class in the Geum River, Korea. Environ. Earth. Sci. 68: 1107-1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1812-y
  19. Moir, H.J., Gibbins, C.N., Soulsby, C., and Youngson, A.F. 2005. PHABSIM modelling of Atlantic salmon spawning habitat in an upland stream: testing the influence of habitat suitability indices on model output. River Research and Applications 21(9): 1021-1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.869
  20. Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the World, third ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  21. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters, vol. II. Columbus, OH: Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section.
  22. Palmer, R.N. and Snyder, R.M. 1985. Effects of instream flow requirements on water supply reliability. Water Resour. Res. 21: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i004p00439
  23. Rankin, E.T. 1989. The Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI), Rationale, Methods, and Application. Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment, Ecological Assessment Section, Columbus, OH.
  24. Rankin, E.T. 1995. The use of habitat assessments in water resource management programs. In: Davis,W., Simon, T. (Eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, p. 181-208.
  25. Rankin, E.T. and Yoder, C.O. 1999. Method for deriving maximum species richness lines and other threshold relationships in biological field data. In: Simon TP, editor. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. Washington, DC, USA: CRC Press, p. 611-24.
  26. Saltveit, S.J., Haug, I., and Brittain, J.E. 2001. Invertebrate drift in a glacial river and its non-glacial tributary. Freshw. Biol 46: 1777-1789. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00858.x
  27. Scruton, D.A., Pennell, C., Ollerhead, L.M.N., Alfredsen, K., Stickler, M., Harby, A., Robertson, M., Clarke, K.D., and LeDrew, L.J. 2008. A synopsis of 'hydropeaking' studies on the response of juvenile Atlantic salmon to experimental flow alteration. Hydrobiologia 609: 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9409-x
  28. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1983a. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents to aquatic organisms, EPA/600/4-78/012.
  29. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1983b. Technical support manual: waterbody surveys and assessment for conducting use attainability analyses. Washington, DC, USA: Office of Water Regulations and Standards, US EPA.
  30. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. EPA 600-R-92-111. Environmental Monitoring systems Laboratory-cincinnati office of Modeling, Monitoring systems, and quality assurance. Office of Research Development, US EPA, Cincinnati OH 45268.