Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Revision Plan of KORMARC Format for Authority Data

KORMARC 전거통제용 개정 방안에 대한 연구

  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이미화 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과 및 학교도서관연구소)
  • Received : 2022.02.26
  • Accepted : 2022.03.14
  • Published : 2022.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the library catalog, the scalability of information acquisition can be guaranteed by expressing various relationships existing between resources. Such a bibliographical relationship can be realized through the authority record. Therefore, the revision of 「KORMARC Format for Authority Data」, the national standard for authority records, is inevitably important. Therefore, for the revision of 「KORMARC Format for Authority Data」, (1) the latest international cataloging trends were analyzed, (2) the opinions of librarians were collected, (3) internal guidelines used for authority work were analyzed, and (4) latest version of MARC21 were analyzed. In addition, for the continuous revision of 「KORMARC Format for Authority Data」, the revision procedure of MARC21 was investigated to draw implications for the KORMARC revision method. Data was collected and utilized through literature reviews, MARC21 analysis, interviews with professors and librarians.

도서관 목록은 자원과 자원 사이에 존재하는 다양한 관계를 표현함으로써 궁극적으로 도서관 목록을 통한 정보 획득의 확장성을 보장할 수 있다. 이러한 서지적 관계는 궁극적으로 전거레코드 구축을 통해 실현될 수 있는데, 이러한 이유로 전거레코드 구축을 위한 국가표준인 「한국문헌자동화목록형식-전거통제용」에 대한 개정작업의 중요성이 강조될 수밖에 없다. 이에 본 연구에서는 「KORMARC-전거통제용」 개정의 기초자료를 확보하기 위해 (1) 최신 국제 목록동향을 분석하고, (2) 도서관 현장 실무자들의 의견을 수렴하였으며, (3) 전거업무에 활용하는 기관 내부지침을 분석하고, (4) MARC21의 최신 버전을 비교분석하여 개정(안)을 도출하였다. 또한 지속적인 「KORMARC-전거통제용」 개정을 위해 MARC21의 개정 절차를 조사하여 국내 KORMARC 개정 방식을 위한 시사점을 도출하였다. 이를 위해 이 연구에서는 각종 문헌연구, MARC21의 분석, 전문가 자문, 실무진 면담 등의 방법을 활용하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, Ji-Won (2009). A study on the adoption of an integrated KORMARC bibliogrphic format. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(3), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.131
  2. Lee, Kyungho (2009). A study on the improvement plan of 245 field in KORMARC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.1.200903.181
  3. Lee, Kyungho (2014). A study for grouping works in KORMARC database based on RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.149
  4. Lee, Kyungho & Kim, Jeonghyen (2006). A study on the characteristics and problems of an integrated KORMARC bibliographic formats. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(4), 201-223.
  5. Lee, Mihwa (2021). A study on considerations in the authority control to accommodate LRM nomen. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.52.1.202103.109
  6. National Library of Korea (2016). Korean Machine Readable Cataloging (KORMARC) format-Part 4: Authority data. Available: https://librarian.nl.go.kr/kormarc/kormarc_2016/index.html
  7. Rho, Jee-Hyun & Lee, Eun-Ju (2018). Current status of holdings data in Korean libraries and proposal for revision of KORMARC format for holdings data. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.4.201812.93
  8. Rho, Jee-Hyun & Lee, Mihwa (2014). A study on the revision of KORMARC-authority format by reflecting the international trends of authority control. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 25(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2014.25.1.061
  9. ALA, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and CILIP (2020). RDA toolkit. Available: https://www.rdatoolkit.org/
  10. Glennan, K. (2019). Getting a handle on the new RDA toolkit. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Getting%20a%20Handle%20on%20the%20New%20RDA%20Toolkit%20rev.pdf
  11. Library of Congress (2021). MARC 21 format for authority data Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/
  12. Library of Congress (2021). MARC Development. MARC discussion paper no. 2021-DP10. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/2021/2021-dp10.html
  13. Library of Congress (2021). MARC Development. MARC discussion paper no. 2021-DP6. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/2021/2021-dp06.html
  14. Library of Congress (2021). MARC Development. MARC discussion paper no. 2021-DP12. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/mac/2021/2021-dp12.html
  15. Maxwell, R. L. (2019). New concepts: nomens and appellations. Available: https://www.slideshare.net/ALAeLearningSolutions/new-concepts-nomens-and-appellations
  16. Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017). IFLA Library Reference Model. 이미화 번역(2020). IFLA 도서관 참조 모형. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712-ko.pdf