Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Success Factors for Technology Commercialization of Venture Companies in the 4th Industry : Focusing on smart farm companies

4차 산업 벤처기업의 기술사업화 성공 요인 분석 : 스마트팜 기업 중심으로

  • Kim, Dae Yu (Namseoul University of Bigdata Industrial Security) ;
  • Bae, Jang Won (Korea University of Technology and Education, School of Industrial Management)
  • 김대유 (남서울대학교 빅데이터산업보안학과) ;
  • 배장원 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.12
  • Accepted : 2022.03.20
  • Published : 2022.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze how innovative facility investment and innovative research manpower capabilities of venture companies related to the 4th industrial smart farm affect the technological performance of patents and design registrations, and the financial performance of sales and operating profit. As a research method, a total of 47 venture companies were selected as a sample and regression analysis was performed. Research Results This study analyzes the technological commercialization factors of venture companies related to the 4th industrial smart farm and proposes to expand the budget for R&D government tasks for financial and technological success. In the future research direction, I believe that more discussion is needed on the contribution of companies to quantitative and qualitative growth.

본 연구의 목적은 4차 산업 스마트팜 관련 벤처기업의 혁신 설비 투자, 혁신 연구인력 역량이 특허, 디자인등록의 기술성과와 매출 영업이익 재무성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석하였다. 연구 방법으로 총 47개 벤처업체를 표본으로 선정하여 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 연구 결과 본 연구는 4차 산업 스마트팜 관련 벤처기업의 기술사업화 요인을 분석하여 재무적 기술적 성공 기업성과를 위해서 R&D 정부 과제 예산편성 확대를 제안한다. 향후 연구 방향은 기업의 양적인 성장 기여와 질적인 성장 기여에 대한 논의가 더욱 필요할 것이라고 본다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Education and Research promotion program of KOREATECH in 2021

References

  1. Curran, C. S. and Leker, J., "Patent Indicators for Monitoring Convergence-Examples from NFF and ICT", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2): 256-273. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021
  2. Gans, J. S. and Stern, S, "The Product Market and the Market for "Ideas": Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs", Research Policy, 32(2): 333-350, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8
  3. Teece, D. J, "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy", Research Policy, 15(6): 285-305, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  4. Shim Kwan-seop, "The Effect of Venture Enterprises' technological innovation capability, entrepreneurial characteristics, and technological innovation performance on enterprise productivity"[Master's thesis], Yonsei University. 3-17, 2017.
  5. Nevens, T. M, "Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do", Planning Review, 18(6): 20-24, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054310
  6. Altman, E. I., & Sabato, G, Modelling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US market. Abacus, 43(3), 332-357 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00234.x
  7. Camison, C. &Villar-Lopez, A, "Organizational Innovation as an Enabler of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902, 2007, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  8. Pisano, G, "Profiting from Innovation and the Intellectual Property Revolution", Research Policy, 35(8): 1122-1130, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008
  9. Schoenecker, T.' Swanson' L, " IiKlica化rs of Finn Technological Capability: Validity and Performance Implications, Matu^etnent, Vol. 49' No.1' pp. 36-44, 2002.
  10. Scherer, F. M.(1965), "Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions," American Economic Review 55(5), 1097~1123.
  11. Geroski, P. A. and S. Machin(1992), "Do innovating firms outperform non-innovators?" Business Strategy Review, pp.79~90.
  12. Rafiq, S., R. Salim, and R. Smyth(2016), "The moderating role of firm age in the relationship between R&D expenditure and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese and US mining firms," Economic Modelling 56, pp.122~132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.04.003
  13. Shoham, A, Export performance: and empirical assessment.Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 59-81, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9800600308
  14. Young-Kwon Koh, "A Study on the Effects of Technology-intensive Business Models on Technology Commercialization Performance" [PhD thesis], Soongsil University 1-15, 2017.
  15. Dess, G. & Robinson, R. B., Measuringorganizational performance in the absenceof objective measures: The case of theprivately-held firm and conglomeratebusiness unit. Strategic management Journal, 5(2), 265-273, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306
  16. Oh Se-gu, "The Effect of Collaborative Environment and Establishment of Trust among Businesses on Corporate Performance-Integrated Supply Chain From the perspective of", Journal of the Korean Society for Production Management, 21(4): 413-426, 2010.
  17. Yun-yungyu (2019), R&D mich gisulhyeogsin jiwonjeongchaeggwa cheongnyeon-iljali hangugnodong-yeonguwon