DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Skeletal Differences in Lower Body and Limbs in Relation to Ecological Traits in Anurans in South Korea

  • Park, Jun-Kyu (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kang, Tae Gyu (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Eun (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Eun (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Younghyun (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University) ;
  • Do, Yuno (Department of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.20
  • 심사 : 2021.12.08
  • 발행 : 2022.02.01

초록

The trade-off between morphology and physical function may vary according to ecological traits. Taking a quantitative approach, we attempted to analyze the differences in the skeletal shape of the lower body and limbs in relation to the ecological traits of four anuran species (Dryophytes japonicus, Glandirana rugosa, Pelophylax nigromaculatus, and Lithobates catesbeianus) occurring in South Korea. Body size, locomotor mode, microhabitat, trophic positions, and predator defense mechanisms were selected for the ecological traits of the anurans. The pelvis, ilium, and urostyle, which are associated with locomotor performance, were selected for the skeletal shape of the lower body. The ratio of limbs, which is related to locomotor mode and microhabitat, was confirmed by analyzing the skeletons of the forelimbs (radio-ulnar and humerus) and hindlimbs (femur and tibiofibular). Both landmark-based geometric morphometrics and traditional methods were used for skeletal shape comparison. The skeletal shape of the lower body was completely different among the four species, whereas the ratio of the limbs was only different in D. japonicus. The skeletal shape of the lower body may be related to body mass and predator defense mechanisms, whereas the ratio of the limbs was related to the locomotor mode and microhabitat. Quantifying these morphological differences among various species can help elucidate the mechanisms of behavioral and morphological changes in response to ecological effects.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2018R1C1B3008645).

참고문헌

  1. Adams, D.C., Rohlf, F.J., and Slice, D.E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000409356545
  2. AmphibiaWeb. (2007). Pelophylax nigromaculatus: Dark-Spotted Frog. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://amphibiaweb.org/species/5109.
  3. AmphibiaWeb. (2017). Hyla japonica: Japanese Tree Frog. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://amphibiaweb.org/species/832.
  4. AmphibiaWeb. (2019a). Glandirana rugosa: Wrinkled Frog. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://amphibiaweb.org/species/5138.
  5. AmphibiaWeb. (2019b). Rana catesbeiana: Bullfrog. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://amphibiaweb.org/species/4999.
  6. AmphibiaWeb. (2021). Browse by Family. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://amphibiaweb.org/lists/index.shtml.
  7. Bookstein, F.L. (1989). Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567-585. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.24792
  8. Bookstein, F.L. (1997). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Bookstein, F.L., Chernoff, B., Elder, R., Humphries, J., Smith, G., and Strauss, R. (1985). Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology: The Geometry of Size and Shape Change, With Examples from Fishes (The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Special Publication No. 15). Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
  10. Buttimer, S.M., Stepanova, N., and Womack, M.C. (2020). Evolution of the unique anuran pelvic and hind limb skeleton in relation to microhabitat, locomotor mode, and jump performance. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 60, 1330-1345. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa043
  11. Emerson, S.B. (1978). Allometry and jumping in frogs: helping the twain to meet. Evolution, 32, 551-564. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407721
  12. Emerson, S.B. (2013). Jumping and leaping. In M. Hildebrand, D.M., Bramble, and K.F., Liem, and D.B., Wake (Eds.), Functional Vertebrate Morphology (pp. 58-72). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  13. Emerson, S.B., and Koehl, M. (1990). The interaction of behavioral and morphological change in the evolution of a novel locomotor type: "flying" frogs. Evolution, 44, 1931-1946. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409604
  14. Enriquez-Urzelai, U., Montori, A., Llorente, G.A., and Kaliontzopoulou, A. (2015). Locomotor mode and the evolution of the hindlimb in Western Mediterranean anurans. Evolutionary Biology, 42, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9311-1
  15. Hall, B.K. (2008). Fins into Limbs: Evolution, Development, and Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Jorgensen, M.E., and Reilly, S.M. (2013). Phylogenetic patterns of skeletal morphometrics and pelvic traits in relation to locomotor mode in frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12128
  17. Kang, C., Kim, Y.E., and Jang, Y. (2016). Colour and pattern change against visually heterogeneous backgrounds in the tree frog Hyla japonica. Scientific Reports, 6, 22601. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22601
  18. Marcus, L.F. (1990). Traditional morphometrics. In F.J. Rohlf, and F.L., Bookstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop (pp. 77-122). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
  19. Mendoza, E., Azizi, E., and Moen, D.S. (2020). What explains vast differences in jumping power within a clade? Diversity, ecology and evolution of anuran jumping power. Functional Ecology, 34, 1053-1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13545
  20. Moen, D.S., Irschick, D.J., and Wiens, J.J. (2013). Evolutionary conservatism and convergence both lead to striking similarity in ecology, morphology and performance across continents in frogs. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 280, 20132156.
  21. Moen, D.S., and Wiens, J.J. (2017). Microhabitat and climatic niche change explain patterns of diversification among frog families. American Naturalist, 190, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/692065
  22. Morey, S.R. (1990). Microhabitat Selection and Predation in the Pacific Treefrog, Pseudacris regilla. Journal of Herpetology, 24, 292-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1564396
  23. Nauwelaerts, S., and Aerts, P. (2006). Take-off and landing forces in jumping frogs. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01969
  24. Nauwelaerts, S., Ramsay, J., and Aerts, P. (2007). Morphological correlates of aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in a semiaquatic frog, Rana esculenta: no evidence for a design conflict. Journal of Anatomy, 210, 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00691.x
  25. Park, J.K., and Do, Y. (2019). Assessment of body condition in amphibians using radiography: relationship between bone mineral density and food resource availability. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 52, 358-365. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2019.52.4.358
  26. Park, J.K., and Do, Y. (2020). Evaluating the physical condition of Hyla japonica using radiographic techniques. Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138596
  27. Rebelo, A.D., and Measey, J. (2019). Locomotor performance constrained by morphology and habitat in a diverse clade of African frogs (Anura: Pyxicephalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127, 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz007
  28. Rohlf, F.J. (2006). tpsDig, Version 2.10. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  29. Rohlf, F.J., and Marcus, L.F. (1993). A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J
  30. Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., and Eliceiri, K.W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9, 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
  31. Shubin, N.H., and Jenkins, F.A. (1995). An early Jurassic jumping frog. Nature, 377, 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/377049a0
  32. Takahara, T., Mitsuhashi-Ohnishi, C., Fujiwara-Tsujii, N., and Yamaoka, R. (2011). Characterization of chemical defenses in ranid tadpoles against a fish predator. Journal of Ethology, 29, 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0269-x
  33. Tatsuta, H., Takahashi, K.H., and Sakamaki, Y. (2018). Geometric morphometrics in entomology: basics and applications. Entomological Science, 21, 164-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12293
  34. Vega-Trejo, R., Zuniga-Vega, J.J., and Langerhans, R.B. (2014). Morphological differentiation among populations of Rhinella marina (Amphibia: Anura) in western Mexico. Evolutionary Ecology, 28, 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9667-6
  35. Vidal-Garcia, M., and Keogh, J.S. (2015). Convergent evolution across the Australian continent: ecotype diversification drives morphological convergence in two distantly related clades of Australian frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28, 2136-2151. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12746
  36. Vidal-Garcia, M., and Scott Keogh, J. (2017). Phylogenetic conservatism in skulls and evolutionary lability in limbs-morphological evolution across an ancient frog radiation is shaped by diet, locomotion and burrowing. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17, 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0993-0
  37. Wake, D.B., and Koo, M.S. (2018). Amphibians. Current Biology, 28, R1237-R1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.028
  38. Wells, K.D. (2010). The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  39. Yoshimura, Y., and Kasuya, E. (2013). Odorous and non-fatal skin secretion of adult wrinkled frog (Rana rugosa) is effective in avoiding predation by snakes. PLoS One, 8, e81280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081280
  40. Zug, G.R. (1972). Anuran locomotion: structure and function. I. Preliminary observations on relation between jumping and osteometrics of appendicular and postaxial skeleton. Copeia, 1972, 613-624. https://doi.org/10.2307/1442720