Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synergistic antibacterial effect of disinfectants and microbubble water to Salmonella Typhimurium

  • Seung-Won, Yi (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Young-Hun, Jung (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Sang-Ik, Oh (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Han Gyu, Lee (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yoon Jung, Do (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Eun-Yeong, Bok (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Tai-Young, Hur (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Eunju, Kim (Division of Animal Diseases & Health, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2022.11.02
  • Accepted : 2022.12.02
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Salmonella is a pathogenic bacterium that has long been important industrially because it has a wide host range and can be transmitted to humans through direct contact as well as indirect contact such as food contaminated with animal waste. Understanding how to reduce Salmonella contamination in pig farms is important for public health and the livestock industry from an economic perspective. In the swine industry, high concentrations of disinfectants have been applied because it is difficult to effectively control Salmonella in environments contaminated with organic substances. In order to evaluate the synergetic effect of disinfectants, the efficacy of two commercial disinfectants diluted in hard water and microbubble water (MBW) were compared under the laboratory condition. Different concentrations of both disinfectants combined with 1% detergent diluted in the two diluents were evaluated for their antibacterial effect. In the case of monopersulfate-based disinfectant groups, the growth of Salmonella was not observed at 1:200 dilution with both the hard water and MBW combined with 1% detergent. In the case of citric acid-based disinfectant, the bacterial growth was not observed at 1:800 dilution with MBW combined with 1% detergent. Our results show that the use of MBW as a diluent might improve the biological activities of acid-based disinfectant.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the "Development for biosecurity evaluation method on livestock farms and the pig farm hygiene management method (Project No. PJ015119)", National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y, 2011. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere 84: 1175-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054
  2. Aksoy A, El Kahlout K, Yardimci H, 2020. Comparative evaluation of the effects of binzalkonium chloride, iodine, gluteraldehyde and hydrogen peroxide disinfectants against avian Salmonellae focusing on genotypic resistance pattern of the Salmonellae serotypes toward benzalkonium chloride. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 22: 1-12.
  3. Al-Nabulsi AA, Olaimat AN, Osaili TM, Shaker RR, Elabedeen NZ, Jaradat ZW, Abushelaibi A, Holley RA, 2014. Use of acetic and citric acids to control Salmonella Typhimurium in tahini (sesame paste). Food Microbiology 42: 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.020
  4. Andres VM, Davies RH, 2015. Biosecurity measures to control Salmonella and other infectious agents in pig farms: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 14: 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12137
  5. Authority EFS, 2006. Opinion of the scientific panel on biological hazards (BIOHAZ) related to "Risk assessment and mitigation options of Salmonella in pig production". EFSA Journal 4: 341.
  6. Bai Y, Ding X, Zhao Q, Sun H, Li T, Li Z, Wang H, Zhang L, Zhang C, Xu S, 2022. Development of an organic acid compound disinfectant to control food-borne pathogens and its application in chicken slaughterhouses. Poultry Science 101: 101842.
  7. Bonardi S, 2017. Salmonella in the pork production chain and its impact on human health in the European Union. Epidemiology & Infection 145: 1513-1526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881700036X
  8. Cabrera Y, Ancizar J, Felipe P, 2017. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of two disinfectants and one detergent with disinfectant action in swine facilities. Computerized Journal of Pig Production 24: 228-231.
  9. da Costa Luciano C, Olson N, Tipple AFV, Alfa M, 2016. Evaluation of the ability of different detergents and disinfectants to remove and kill organisms in traditional biofilm. American Journal of Infection Control 44: e243-e249.
  10. Dewey HM, Jones JM, Keating MR, Budhathoki-Uprety J, 2021. Increased use of disinfectants during the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impacts on health and safety. ACS Chemical Health & Safety 29: 27-38.
  11. Dibner J, Buttin P, 2002. Use of organic acids as a model to study the impact of gut microflora on nutrition and metabolism. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 11: 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/11.4.453
  12. Eng S-K, Pusparajah P, Ab Mutalib NS, Ser H-L, Chan K-G, Lee L-H, 2015. Salmonella: a review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Frontiers in Life Science 8: 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2015.1051243
  13. Fosse J, Seegers H, Magras C, 2009. Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review. Zoonoses and public health 56: 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01185.x
  14. Gomez-Garcia M, Arguello H, Perez-Perez L, Vega C, Puente H, Mencia-Ares O, Rubio P, Carvajal A, 2022. Combined in-vitro and on-farm evaluation of commercial disinfectants used against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae. Porcine Health Management 8: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00243-w
  15. Gosling R, 2018. A review of cleaning and disinfection studies in farming environments. Livestock 23: 232-237. https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2018.23.5.232
  16. Gosling RJ, Mawhinney I, Vaughan K, Davies RH, Smith RP, 2017. Efficacy of disinfectants and detergents intended for a pig farm environment where Salmonella is present. Veterinary microbiology 204: 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.004
  17. Heier BT, Tarpai A, Bergsjo B, Kalberg S, Hofshagen M, 2016. The surveillance programmes for Salmonella in live animals, eggs and meat in Norway 2015: 3-8.
  18. Jang Y, Lee K, Yun S, Lee M, Song J, Chang B, Choe NH, 2017. Efficacy evaluation of commercial disinfectants by using Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as a test organism. Journal of veterinary science 18: 209-216.
  19. Kunanusont N, Punyadarsaniya D, Jantafong T, Pojprasath T, Takehara K, Ruenphet S, 2020. Bactericidal efficacy of potassium peroxymonosulfate under various concentrations, organic material conditions, exposure timing and its application on various surface carriers. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 33: 20-324.
  20. Marteinson SC, Lawrence MJ, Taranu ZE, Kosziwka K, Taylor JJ, Green A, Winegardner A, Rytwinski T, Reid JL, Dubetz C, 2022. Increased use of sanitizers and disinfectants during the COVID-19 pandemic: identification of antimicrobial chemicals and considerations for aquatic environmental contamination. Environmental Reviews. 31: 73-91.
  21. Martelli F, Lambert M, Butt P, Cheney T, Tatone FA, Callaby R, Rabie A, Gosling RJ, Fordon S, Crocker G, 2017. Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom. PloS one 12: e0178897.
  22. McFarland J, 1907. The nephelometer: an instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in suspensions used for calculating the opsonic index and for vaccines. Journal of the American Medical Association 49: 1176-1178. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1907.25320140022001f
  23. Moraes MA, Oliveira-Silva M, Goulart RS, Gabarra MHC, Miranda CES, Almeida PG, Pitondo-Silva A, 2022. Evaluation of new antimicrobial products based on potassium monopersulfate for disinfection of poultry farms.
  24. Moretro T, Vestby L, Nesse L, Storheim S, Kotlarz K, Langsrud S, 2009. Evaluation of efficacy of disinfectants against Salmonella from the feed industry. Journal of Applied Microbiology 106: 1005-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04067.x
  25. Mroz Z, 2005. Organic acids as potential alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters for pigs. Advances in pork production 16: 169-182.
  26. Ostanello F, De Languid Lucia A, 2020. On-farm risk factors associated with Salmonella in pig herds. Large Animal Review 26: 133-140.
  27. Patel AK, Singhania RR, Chen C-W, Tseng Y-S, Kuo C-H, Wu C-H, Di Dong C, 2021. Advances in micro-and nano bubbles technology for application in biochemical processes. Environmental Technology & Innovation 23: 101729.
  28. Ronnqvist M, Valttila V, Ranta J, Tuominen P, 2018. Salmonella risk to consumers via pork is related to the Salmonella prevalence in pig feed. Food microbiology 71: 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.03.017
  29. Seo S, Jung D, Wang X, Seo DJ, Lee MH, Lee B-H, Choi C, 2013. Combined effect of lactic acid bacteria and citric acid on Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium. Food Science and Biotechnology 22: 1171-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0199-1
  30. Skowron K, Walecka-Zacharska E, Grudlewska K, Gajewski P, Wiktorczyk N, Wietlicka-Piszcz M, Dudek A, Skowron KJ, Gospodarek-Komkowska E, 2019. Disinfectant susceptibility of biofilm formed by Listeria monocytogenes under selected environmental conditions. Microorganisms 7: 280.
  31. Snary EL, Swart AN, Simons RR, Domingues ARC, Vigre H, Evers EG, Hald T, Hill AA, 2016. A quantitative microbiological risk assessment for Salmonella in pigs for the European Union. Risk Analysis 36: 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12586
  32. Subpiramaniyam S, 2021. Outdoor disinfectant sprays for the prevention of COVID-19: are they safe for the environment? Science of the Total Environment 759: 144289.
  33. Tamaki M, Kobayashi F, Ikeura H, Sato M, 2018. Disinfection by ozone microbubbles can cause morphological change of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis spores. The plant pathology journal 34: 335.
  34. Tsuge H, Li P, Shimatani N, Shimamura Y, Nakata H, Ohira M, 2009. Fundamental study on disinfection effect of microbubbles. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 35: 548-552. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu.35.548
  35. Wales A, Breslin M, Davies R, 2006. Assessment of cleaning and disinfection in Salmonella-contaminated poultry layer houses using qualitative and semi-quantitative culture techniques. Veterinary Microbiology 116: 283-293.
  36. Wales A, Cook A, Davies R, 2011. Producing Salmonella-free pigs: a review focusing on interventions at weaning. Veterinary Record 168: 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d1125
  37. Walia K, Arguello H, Lynch H, Grant J, Leonard FC, Lawlor PG, Gardiner GE, Duffy G, 2017. The efficacy of different cleaning and disinfection procedures to reduce Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae in the lairage environment of a pig abattoir. International Journal of Food Microbiology 246: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.02.002
  38. Zhang ZH, Wang S, Cheng L, Ma H, Gao X, Brennan CS, Yan J-K, 2022. Micro-nano-bubble technology and its applications in food industry: a critical review. Food Reviews International, 1-23.