DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intraoral Scan for Virtual Skull-Dentition Hybrid Images of Young Patients

가상 골격-치열 하이브리드 이미지 생성을 위한 구강 스캐너의 활용

  • Lee, Joohee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Clinic Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Yang, ByoungEun (Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University) ;
  • Lee, Hyelim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Clinic Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • 이주희 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교성심병원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 양병은 (한림대학교 임상치의학대학원) ;
  • 이혜림 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교성심병원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2021.07.12
  • Accepted : 2021.10.14
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

Additional dentition images are needed because the dentitions are distorted in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) due to streak artifacts and non-uniformity of the x-ray beam. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of improving the dentition image of CBCT scan with intraoral scanner instead of plaster models. Maxilla images from plaster models, two intraoral scanners, and CBCT of 20 patients aged 12 to 18 were used in this study. With one of the intraoral scanners, the full arch was scanned by three segments and combined into a complete full arch. Virtual skull-dentition hybrid images from intraoral scanners were superimposed with the images from plaster models to evaluate the coordinate value difference and distance at reference points. The results showed that the coordinate value difference and distance were smallest with segmented intraoral scan, which showed only 2 ㎛ distance. Intraoral scan may provide good dentition images for virtual skull-dentition images.

콘빔 전산화 단층촬영(CBCT)은 치열을 왜곡시켜 추가 치열 이미지가 필요하다. 치열 이미지로 주로 사용되는 석고 모형을 대신해 구강 스캐너로 CBCT의 치열 이미지를 보완할 때의 임상적 활용 가능성을 평가하였다. 만 12 - 18세의 20명에게 상악에 대한 석고 모형, 구강 스캔 이미지, CBCT이미지를 획득하였다. 비교를 위해 두 종류의 구강 스캐너를 이용하였는데, 그 중 하나의 구강 스캐너로는 전악을 3분할하여 각각을 스캔한 후 이들을 병합해 전악 이미지를 획득하는 방법을 추가로 시행하였다. 구강 스캐너를 이용해 얻은 가상 골격-치열 하이브리드 이미지를 석고 모형을 통해 얻은 이미지와 중첩하여 각 기준점에서의 좌표 값의 차이와 거리를 측정하였다. 결과적으로 구강 스캐너로 분할하여 스캔하는 방법을 시행했을 때 평균 거리 2 ㎛를 보여 가장 적게 나타났다. 구강 스캐너를 적절히 이용하면 가상 골격-치열 하이브리드 이미지를 위한 치열 이미지로 훌륭히 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Badiali G, Costabile E, Marchetti C, et al. : Virtual Orthodontic Surgical Planning to Improve the Accuracy of the Surgery-First Approach: A Prospective Evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77:2104-2115, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.017
  2. Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM : Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 29:393-415, 2018.
  3. De Grauwe A, Ayaz I, Jacobs R, et al . : CBCT in orthodontics: a systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod, 41:381-389, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy066
  4. Chiarelli T, Franchini F, Sansoni T, et al. : From implant planning to surgical execution: an integrated approach for surgery in oral implantology. Int J Med Robot, 8:57-66, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.422
  5. Li B, Zhang L, Wang X, et al. : A novel method of computer aided orthognathic surgery using individual CAD/CAM templates: a combination of osteotomy and repositioning guides. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51:239-244, 2013.
  6. Flugge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, Metzger MC : Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71:1340-1346, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.010
  7. Klinke T, Daboul A, Biffar R, et al. : Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials. PLoS One, 7:31766, 2012.
  8. Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Hammerle CH, et al. : In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res, 24:378-383, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12048
  9. Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Kim JS, et al. : Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc, 35:850-857, 2007.
  10. Kovacs M, Danyi R, Dobo-Nagy C, et al. : Distortional effect of beam-hardening artefacts on micro CT: a simulation study based on an in vitro caries model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 108:591-599, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.009
  11. Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R : Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil, 37:352-358, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02065.x
  12. Yang WM, Ho CT, Lo LJ : Automatic superimposition of palatal fiducial markers for accurate integration of digital dental model and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 73:1616, 2015.
  13. Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A : A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61:222-227, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50033
  14. Mangano C, Luongo F, Mangano FG, et al. : Combining intraorals cans, conebeam computed tomography and face scans: the virtual patient. J Craniofac Surg, 29:2241-2246, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004485
  15. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mormann W, Reich S : Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview. Int J Comput Dent, 18:101-129, 2015.
  16. Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K : Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110:365-369, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70036-7
  17. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H : Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14:10, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
  18. Baan F, Bruggink R, Ongkosuwito E, et al. : Fusion of intraoral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans. Clin Oral Investig, 25:77-85, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03336-y
  19. Kim JW, Kim JC, Yang BE, et al. : The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system. BMC Oral Health, 19:18, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0711-y
  20. Uechi J, Okayama M, Mizoguchi I, et al. : A novel method for the 3-dimensional simulation of orthognathic surgery by using a multimodal image-fusion technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130:786-798, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.025
  21. Nkenke E, Zachow S, Lell M, et al. : Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33:226-232, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27071199
  22. Ayoub A, Rehab M, Naudi K, et al. : A novel approach for planning orthognathic surgery: the integration of dental casts into three-dimensional printed mandibular models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 43:454-459, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.016
  23. O'Toole S, Osnes C, Bartlett D, Keeling A : Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment. Dent Mater J, 35:495-500, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.012
  24. De Waard O, Baan F, Maal T, et al. : A novel method for fusion of intra-oral scans and cone-beam computed tomography scans for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 44:160-166, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.11.017
  25. Mehl A, Koch R, Zaruba M, Ender A : 3D monitoring and quality control using intraoral optical camera systems. Int J Comput Dent, 16:23-36, 2013.
  26. Cevidanes LH, Bailey L, Turvey T, et al. : Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 34:369-375, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17102411
  27. Cevidanes LH, Heymann G, Tulloch JC, et al. : Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136:94-99, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018