DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Index for Food Safety Status based on the Statistical Data

식품안전수준에 대한 지수 개발 연구

  • 양성범 (단국대학교 환경자원경제학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.24
  • Accepted : 2022.02.15
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

Measuring the food safety has been focused only on the psychological consumers' recognition of food safety. The actual measurement tool should consist of the evidence-based statistical data to assess the level of national food safety in scientific perspectives. This paper described the development of a concept to measure the food safety of the food chain based on OECD PSR framework. This paper discusses the elaboration of a set of 8 food safety related data issued as statistical data, and which were same weighted. These food safety statistical data (FSDs) were derived as the basis of measuring the variation of food safety during 2013-2019. The values of the primary production indicator (PPI), the processing and manufacturing indicator (PMI), and the distribution and consumption indicator (DCI) are 0.558-0.859, 0.533-0.691, and 0.979-0.982, respectively. The food safety status (FSS) derived from the safety indicator values of each of the three stages is 0.700-0.810. In order to increase the level of food safety, it is necessary to pay attention to PMI and PPI management. In the future, continuously calculating the level of food safety, managing it like the level of psychological safety, and further expanding it to the level of food safety between countries will help establish policies to improve the level of food safety in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2020학년도 단국대학교 대학연구비 지원으로 연구되었음.

References

  1. Yoo, H. J. and S. H. Joo. 2012. A Structural Equation Analysis on Consumers' Perceived Food Safety and Food Safety Orientation Behavior. Consumer Policy and Education Review. 8(4): 49-70.
  2. Jin, H. J., J. Y. Lim, and K. I. Lee. 2014. The Sentiment Index of Consumers about Food Safety and Analysis for Influential Factors. Journal of Consumer Policy. 45(5): 1-21.
  3. Choung, K. H., J. S. Choi, and D. Y. Kim. 2017. Consumer Perception of Food Safety in 2017. Korea Health Promotion Institute.
  4. Yang, S. B. and S. R. Yang. 2013. A Study of the Perception and Purchase Behavior on Foreign Matters in Food. Korean J. Food & Nutr. 26(3): 470-475. https://doi.org/10.9799/KSFAN.2013.26.3.470
  5. Baert, K., X. H. Van, O. Wilmart, L. Jacxsens, D. Berkvens, H. Diricks, A. Huyghebaert, and M. Uyttendaele. 2011. Measuring the Safety of the Food Chain in Belgium: Development of a Barometer. Food Res. Int. 44(4): 940-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.005
  6. Baert, K., X. H. Van, L. Jacxsens, D. Berkvens, H. Diricks, A. Huyghebaert, and M. Uyttendaele. 2012. Measuring the Perceived Pressure and Stakeholders' Response that may Impact the Status of the Safety of the Food Chain in Belgium. Food Res. Int. 48(1): 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.04.005
  7. Le Vallee, J. C. and S. Charlebois. 2015. Benchmarking Global Food Safety Performances: The Era of Risk Intelligence. J. Food Protec. 78(10): 1896-1913. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-044
  8. Charlebois, S. and S. Hielm. 2014. Empowering the Regulators in the Development of National Performance Measurements in Food Safety. Br. Food J. 116(2): 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2012-0124
  9. Codex. 2003. Guidelines on the Judgement of Equivalence of Sanitary Measures Associated with Food Inspection and Certification Systems, CAC/GL 53-2003. Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization; Rome.
  10. Levrel, H., C. Kerbiriou, D. Couvet, and J. Weber. 2008. OECD Pressure-state-response Indicators for Managing Biodiversity: a Realistic Perspective for a French Biosphere Reserve. Biodivers. Conserv. 18(7): 1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9507-0
  11. Chung, H. R., T. K. Kwak, Y. S. Choi, H. Y. Kim, J. S. Lee, J. H. Choi, N. Y. Yi, S. Kwon, Y. J. Choi, S. Lee, and M. H. Kang. 2011. Development of Evaluation Indicators for a Children's Dietary Life Safety Index in Korea. Korean J Nutr. 44(1): 49-60. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2011.44.1.49
  12. McKitrick, R. R., E. Aliakbari, and A. Stedman. 2018. Environmental Ranking for Canada and the OECD. Fraser Institute.
  13. Kim, H. 2018. Issues and Analyses on Management Situations of Environment-friendly Agricultural Organizations. Korean J. org. Agric. 26(4): 599-607. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.4.599
  14. Yang, Y., L. Wei, and J. Pei. 2019. Application of Meta-analysis Technique to Assess Effectiveness of HACCP-based FSM Systems in Chinese SLDBs. Food Cont. 96: 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.013
  15. Herath, D. and S. Henson. 2010. Barriers to HACCP Implementation: Evidence from the Food Processing Sector in Ontario, Canada. Agribusiness. 26(2): 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20245
  16. Karipidis, P., K. Athanassiadis, S. Aggelopoulos, and E. Giompliakis. 2009. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Quality Assurance Systems in Small Food Enterprises. Food Cont. 20(2): 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.02.008
  17. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard--measures that Drive Performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70(1): 71-79.
  18. McAdam, R. and T. Walker. 2003. An Inquiry into Balanced Scorecards within Best Value Implementation in UK Local Government. Public Adm. 81(4): 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00375.x