DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spectrofluorometric quantification of Clozapine in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma

  • Received : 2021.10.20
  • Accepted : 2021.12.08
  • Published : 2022.02.25

Abstract

Herein, we present a simple, precise, accurate, and ultra-sensitive spectrofluorimetric method for estimation of clozapine (CLZ) in tablets and human plasma was developed and then validated. A highly fluorescent brown-yellowish fluorophore was formed (λex=469 nm, λemi=540 nm) as a nucleophilic substitution reaction occurred between CLZ and 4-chloro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-Cl) in alkaline mcllavine buffer (pH 9.0). Optimum values of experimental parameters were carefully determined and optimized. The calibration curve was rectilinear over the concentration range of 80-900 ng mL-1 with a linear correlation coefficient (r=0.9984). The LOD and LOQ were determined to be 14 ng mL-1 and 42 ng mL-1, respectively. The proposed approach has been used successfully to quantification of Clozapine in its commercial formulations and human plasma.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Clozapine [3-chloro-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-11H benzo[b][1, 4]benzodiazepine], a member of the dibenzodiazepine derivatives Fig. 1, is considered a second-generation anti-psychotic commonly used in the treatment of both negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenic patients1-3. CLZ is regarded as an effective choice for patients who suffer from resistance or are unresponsive to conventional neuroleptic medications like haloperidol.4, 5 Clozapine is metabolized by liver through microsomal oxidative cytochrome to the relatively inactive metabolites clozapine-N- oxide and N-Desmethylclozapine.6 Despite its excellent effectiveness, clozapine's usage is severely limited due to the incidence of drug-induced agranulocytosis in 1-2% of patients.7-10 This effect is attributed to the toxicity of one of the clozapine's metabolites, N- desmethylclozapine, that appears to be more harmful to the bone marrow than CLZ itself, leading to decreased white blood cells. Thus, Regular monitoring of the white blood cell count is recommended to reduce this risk.11-14 It was reported that clozapine metabolism is inhibited by fluvoxamine medication, resulting in considerably higher clozapine levels in the blood.15

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. chemical structure of Clozapine.

The Physicochemical properties of clozapine were detailed in (Table 1).16, 17 Various analytical methods have been reported for determination of clozapine in several samples. Of these, Electrochemical, 18, 19 Chro- matographic, 20-30 Spectrophotometric, 31 and voltammetric methods.32, 33 The literature review reveals that there was no fluorometric approach was reported for estimation of clozapine, thus the suggested approach describes the first spectrofluorometric approach for quantification of clozapine in its dosage form and fresh human plasma. The suggested approach is mainly depending on a nucleophilic substitution reaction between 4-chloro-7-nitro-2, 1, 3-benzoxadiazole (NBD- Cl) and CLZ via meisenheimer complex in alkaline media (Mcllavine buffer pH 9.0) to produce a bright fluorescent brown-yellowish adduct measured at 540 nm when excited at 469 nm.

Table 1. The physicochemical properties of clozapine 

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0001.png 이미지

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and reagents

clozapine and 98% 4-chloro-7-nitro-2, 1, 3-benzo- xadiazole (NBD-Cl) were purchased from Baoji Guokang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd (Baoji, china). A solution of NBD-Cl reagent with a concentration of 1 mg/mL was freshly prepared by dissolving 100 mg of the reagent in 100 mL of methanol. The solution was covered with aluminum foil to avoid photode- gradation. A solutions of 0.2 M Mcllavine buffer of pH (7.0-11.0) were prepared by dissolving a mixture of 3 g of potassium chloride and 2.474 g of boric acid in 200 mL of distilled water. The required pH value was attained by adjust the solution with 0.2 M of sodium hydroxide. Other chemicals used were sodium hydroxide, boric acid, potassium chloride, hydrochloric acid, 1, 4-dioxan, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, ethanol, butanol, DMSO, and DMF they were all supplied from Merck. Clozapex® Tab 100 mg (Apex Pharma) was supplied from a local pharmacy.

2.2. Instrumental conditions

Shimadzu RF-5301 PC Spectrofluorometer (Kyoto, japan) was used for fluorometric measurements equipped with 1 cm quartz cuvette and xenon lamp (150 watt). Both excitation and emission monochro- mator's slit width were adjusted at 5 nm. Thermostatically controlled water bath LCB-22D (daihan Labtech CO., Korea) has been used for warming purpose. pH measurement was performed using pH meter wtw inolab (pH 720, Germany). Sensitive balance BP 3015 (Sartorius Germany).

2.3. Standard solution

Ten milligram of clozapine powder was carefully weighed and dissolved with 10 mL acetone in beaker (20 mL), then the obtained solution was transferred into 100 mL calibrated flask and diluted with distilled water to prepare a stock solution labeled to contain 100 µg mL−1 of CLZ. The working standard solutions containing 10 µg mL−1 of CLZ were prepared from the stock solutions by dilution with distilled water.

2.4. General analytical procedure

An appropriate portion of the working standard solution (10 µg mL−1) were carefully transferred to a series of 10 mL calibrated flasks and diluted to the mark to prepare a solutions with CLZ concentrations over the range (80-900 ng mL−1). Followed by 1.5 mL of reagent (NBD-Cl) together with 1 mL of Mcllavine buffer (pH 9.0). The reaction mixture was mixed well and heated in a thermostatically controlled water bath for 15 min at 80 °C, then refrigerated for 5 min. After that, 0.6 mL of concentrated HCl was added to acidify the mixture. The flask contents were then diluted to the mark using methanol. The fluorescence intensity of the resulted product was measured at 469 nm when excited at 540 nm. The same procedure was performed without CLZ to obtain blank solution. The calibration graph was produced via plotting the increment in the fluorescence intensity with the respect to CLZ concentration. The regression equation of the calibration graph was derived.

2.5. Procedure for pharmaceutical tablets

Five Clozaril® tablets have been carefully weighed and crashed into fine powder using a stoneware grinder. An accurate quantity of the powder equivalent to 10 mg pure CLZ was weighed and then dissolved using acetone. The resultant solution was filtered and diluted to the mark with distilled water into 100 mL volumetric flask to make a CLZ stock solution with 100 µg mL−1. After further dilution with distilled water, a solution with concentrations of 10 µg mL−1 CLZ was produced. This solution has been further diluted to make a solution with a final concentration 150 ng mL−1 in the general analytical procedure outlined in section(2.4). The linear regression equation of calibration graph was used to calculate CLZ concentration.

2.6. Procedure for spiked human plasma

A fresh healthy human donor whole blood plasma was obtained by collect 4 mL of CLZ -free blood from four healthy human volunteers into a vacutainer sodium heparin tube, which has been subsequently centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 30 minutes. Thereafter, in centrifugal tubes, 1 mL of CLZ stock standard solution was spiked with 1 mL of fresh plasma and 3 mL of acetonitrile solvent (proteins denaturation agent). The resulting solution was diluted to 10.0 mL using acetone and centrifuged again at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes34. The produced supernatant was diluted with distilled water to obtain a final CLZ concentration within a range (100-300 ng mL−1) in the general analytical procedure outlined in section (2.4).

3. Results and Discussion

Non-fluorescent pharmaceutical product that has primary or secondary amino group can be fluorometrically quantified using fluorescent derivatizing agent like NBD-Cl. In this work, the fluorogenic reagent (NBD-Cl) react rapidly with clozapine via meisenheimer complex in alkaline media (Mcllavine buffer pH 9.0) to produce a highly fluorescent brown yellowish adduct which measured at 540 nm when excited at 469 nm Fig. 2.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. The suggested reaction pathway between clozapin and NBD-Cl reagent.

3.1. Experimental conditions optimization

The experimental factors of the subjected approach that enhance the stability and fluorescence intensity of NBD-CLZ product were thoroughly determined and optimized. Each Factor has been studied independently while the other factors kept constant.

3.1.1. Effect of reagent volume

The effect of reagent volume on the fluorescence intensity of reaction product has been studied in the range (0.1-2.5 mL). the fluorescence intensity improved as the reagent volume increased until reach a point (1.5 mL) and the intensity did not increase further. As a consequence, 1.5 mL of NBD-Cl has been chosen for subsequent experiments as detailed in Fig. 3.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Reagent volume effect on the FI of CLZ-NBD product

3.1.2. Effect of pH and mcllavine buffer's volume

In order to study the effect of the acidity and basicity of the reaction media on the formation of the NBD-CLZ product, several Mcllavine buffer solutions with pH ranging from 7.0-12.0 have been employed. Fig. 4 illustrates the gradual increase in fluorescence intensity with the respect to pH value until it attained a maximum point (pH 9.0), above which there was no further increase. Instead, it diminished considerably as a result of the formation of NBD-OH compound, which increased the background signal. Thus, pH 9.0 was selected as the optimal value as detailed in Fig. 4. To select the volume that produces the greatest fluorescence intensity of NBD-CLZ product, several volumes of Mcllavine buffer (pH 9.0) within the range (0.1-2 mL) were used. As shown in Fig. 4, the FI increases as a function of buffer volume until reach a steady state region from (1.0-1.5 mL). followed by marked decrease. Therefore, 1 mL is optimal buffer's volume.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Effect of pH and mcllavine buffer's volume on the FI of NBD-CLZ product.

3.1.3. Effect of the heating temperature and heating time

The influence of heating temperature on the FI of NBD-CLZ product has been checked at different temperature within the range (40-90 oC) through a certain time interval. Fig. 5 illustrate that the highest FI has been achieved at 80±2 oC. At this temperature, the sufficient time required to complete the reaction has been determined using different heating time (1- 30 min). As detailed in Fig. 5, the sufficient heating time was found to be 15 minutes.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Effect of temperature and warming time on the FI of NBD-CLZ product.

3.1.4. Effect of concentrated HCl volume

According to the literature survey, the high hydroxyl ion concentration of the experimental condition (pH 9.0) causes an interfering problem by reacting with NBD-Cl to form NBD-OH compound, which is responsible for increasing the background signal. This problem can be overcome by lowering the pH of the reaction mixture to less than 1 without influencing the NBD-CLZ product by adding concentrated HCl volume following the cooling step. Various HCl volumes has been used within the range (0.1-1.0 mL). The optimal HCl volume was found to be 0.6 mL.

3.1.5. Diluting solvents Effect

To select the solvent that produces the maximum FI of NBD-CLZ product, various diluting solvents have been examined, such as acetonitrile, 1, 4-dioxan acetone, methanol, butanol, ethyl acetate, DMF, DMSO, ethanol, and D.W. The highest FI was attained when using acetone as dilution solvent, as illustrated in Fig. 6.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Diluting solvents effect on the FI of NBD-CLZ product.

3.2. Validation of method

The suggested approach has been validated in accordance with (ICH) recommendations.35

3.2.1. Linearity and range

The Calibration graph of the suggested approach was created via plotting the concentration of CLZ versus the FI of NBD-CLZ product. The linear concentration of the calibration graph ranged from 80-900 ng mL−1 of CLZ. The resulted data were summarized in (Table 2).

Table 2. Analytical parameters of the suggested approach

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0002.png 이미지

**LOQ: Limit of quantitation. *LOD: Limit of detection

3.2.2. limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantitation (LOQ)

LOD and LOQ of the suggested approach were obtained by calculating the standard deviation (S.D) of seven blank solution. The obtained S.D value was substituted in the equations supplied by the ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines, where

\(L O D=\frac{3.3 S}{b}, L O Q=\frac{10 S}{b}\)

where S denotes to S.D, while b denotes to slope of the calibration graph's regression line. As mentioned in (Table 2), The small LOD and LOQ values indicate that the suggested approach is highly sensitive.

3.2.3. Accuracy

The suggested approach's accuracy has been determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the NBD-CLZ product using three concentration level within the calibration graph (100, 200, 300 ng mL−1) by performing five replications of each selected concentration. As detailed in (Table 3), the obtained results were analyzed to obtain percent recovery (Re%) whose values indicate the suggested approach is highly accurate.

Table 3. Accuracy data of the suggested approach

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0003.png 이미지

*Mean of five determinations

3.2.4. Precision

The precision of the suggested approach has been represented as inter-day precision (Reproducibility) and intra-day precision (Repeatability). Three CLZ concentration (150, 200, and 300 ng mL−1) was selected to test the precision of the suggested approach. Each concentration was analyzed at consecutive time during the day to obtain repeatability and at different day to obtain reproducibility. As illustrated in (Table 4), the low value of relative standard deviation (R.S.D.%less than 2) indicate that the suggested approach is highly precise.

Table 4.Intra- and inter-day precisions of the suggested approach

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0004.png 이미지

*Mean of five determinations

3.2.5. Robustness

The robustness describes the stability of the analytical method under a slight change in some experimental factors. In this work, four experimental factors (warming time, Temperature, pH, and reagent volume) was slightly changed to test the robustness of the suggested approach. As mentioned in (Table 5), the obtained values of percent recovery and R.S.D.% implies that slight changes in experimental conditions have no considerable effect on the quantification of CLZ.

Table 5. Robustness evaluation for the suggested approach.

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0006.png 이미지

*Mean of five determinations

3.3. Application

3.3.1. Application in the pharmaceutical vial

The suggested approach has been successfully used for quantifying of clozapine in pharmaceutical tablets. The resulted data have been compared with the result produced from reported method using student’s t and f test at confidence level equal to 95%.36 (Table 6) illustrate the t and f values of the suggested approach were less than relevant tabulated values, implying that the official or reported method and the suggested approach were not statistically different.

Table 6.Statistical comparison of data resulted by suggested approach with those of the reported one for determination of CLZ in pharmaceutical tablets

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0005.png 이미지

*The value between bracket represent the corresponding f and t tubulated values

3.3.2. Application in the spiked human plasma

Five CLZ concentration (100, 150, 200, 250, 300 ng mL−1) were successfully determined in spiked fresh human plasma. The obtained values of recovery percent (Re%) were mentioned in (Table 7).

Table 7.Application of the suggested approach for determination of CLZ in human plasma

BGHHBN_2022_v35n1_24_t0007.png 이미지

*Mean of five determinations

4. Conclusions

The prescribed spectrofluorometric approach provides a simple, rapid and precise method for the estimation of clozapine in its pharmaceutical tablet and spiked fresh human plasma without interferences from plasma matrix or common excipients. Moreover, the developed method showed promising selectivity, sensitivity, a good linear range, excellent quantitative recoveries and low detection limit for the estimation of CLZ. Unlike chromatographic techniques, the proposed method has less run time, low cost and less solvent consuming. Further, the values of relative standard deviation (R.S.D%) were less than 2% for reproducibility and repeatability analysis. Therefore, the method was considering an effective tool for analysis of CLZ in clinical and quality control laboratories.

References

  1. M. W. Jann, Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther., 11(3), 179-195 (1991).
  2. M. G. Choc, F. Hsuan, G. Honigfeld, W. T. Robinson, L. Ereshefsky, M. L. Crismon, S. R. Saklad, J. Hirschowitz and R. Wagner, Pharm. Res., 7(4), 347-351 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015859103824
  3. M. A. Raggi, V. Pucci, F. Bugamelli and V. Volterra, J. AOAC Int., 84(2), 361-367 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/84.2.361
  4. A. Essali, N. A. H. Haasan, C. Li and J. Rathbone, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2009(1), 1-174 (2009).
  5. D. Siskind, L. McCartney, R. Goldschlager and S. Kisely, Br. J. Psychiatry, 209(5), 385-392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.177261
  6. P. B. Mitchell, in 'Therapeutic drug monitoring of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs', Vol. 7, p257-275, Elsevier, 2020.
  7. J. M. J. Alvir, J. A. Lieberman, A. Z. Safferman, J. L. Schwimmer and J. A. Schaaf, NEJM, 329(3), 162-167 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199307153290303
  8. F. Islam, D. Hain, D. Lewis, R. Law, L. Brown, J.-A. Tanner and D. J. Mueller, Biol. Psychiatry, 89(9), S341 (2021).
  9. N. Tunsirimas, P. Pariwatcharakul, S. Choovanichvong and W. Ratta-Apha, Asian J. Psychiatr., 41, 13-16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2019.03.002
  10. S. Rajagopal, in 'Clozapine, agranulocytosis, and benign ethnic neutropenia', The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 2005.
  11. M. Hasegawa, P. A. Cola and H. Y. Meltzer, Neuropsychopharmacology, 11(1), 45-47 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.1994.34
  12. M. Wicinski and M. M. Weclewicz, Curr. Opin. Hematol., 25(1), 22-28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000391
  13. S. L. Gerson and H. Meltzer, Drug Safety, 7(1), 17-25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199200071-00007
  14. W. Ng, R. Kennar and J. Uetrecht, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 27(7), 1104-1108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/tx500183x
  15. B. A. Sproule, C. A. Naranjo, K. E. Bremner and P. C. Hassan, Clin. Pharmacokinet., 33(6), 454-471 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199733060-00004
  16. U. A. Patil and B. Ghosh, Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res., 1, 733-736 (2009).
  17. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00363.
  18. H. Ben-Yoav, S. E. Chocron, T. E. Winkler, E. Kim, D. L. Kelly, G. F. Payne and R. Ghodssi, Electrochim. Acta., 163, 260-270 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.112
  19. K. Farhadi and A. Karimpour, Anal. Sci., 23(4), 479- 483 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.23.479
  20. U. Bondesson and L. H. Lindstrom, Psychopharmacology, 95(4), 472-475 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172957
  21. M. Rosland, P. Szeto, R. Procyshyn, A. M. Barr and K. M. Wasan, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 33(10), 1158-1166 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/03639040701484338
  22. M. Raggi, F. Bugamelli, R. Mandrioli, D. De Ronchi and V. Volterra, Chromatographia, 49(1-2), 75-80 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02467191
  23. Y. Liu, L. D. van Troostwijk and H. J. Guchelaar, Biomed. Chromatogr., 15(4), 280-286 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.73
  24. C. Wongsinsup, W. Taesotikul, S. Kaewvichit, S. Sangsrijan and S. Sangsrija, CMU. J. Nat. Sci., 9, 29-37 (2010).
  25. E. Schulz, C. Fleischhaker and H. Remschmidt, Pharmacopsychiatry, 28(01), 20-25 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-979583
  26. K. Manjunatha and V. Venkateshwarlu, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 67(4), 448 (2005).
  27. H. Weigmann, J. Bierbrauer, S. Hartter and C. Hiemke, Ther. Drug Monit., 19(4), 480-488 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199708000-00020
  28. E. Dural, G. MERGEN and T. SOYLEMEZOGLU, Turkish J. Pharm. Sci., 12(2), 177-186 (2015).
  29. S. Mennickent, A. Sobarzo, M. Vega, C. G. Godoy and M. de Diego, J. Sep. Sci., 30(13), 2167-2172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700017
  30. A. Avenoso, G. Facciola, G. M. Campo, A. Fazio and E. Spina, J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl., 714(2), 299-308 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00202-3
  31. A. M. Eldidamony, S. M. Hafeez and M. M. A. Hafez, Int. J. Pharm., 7(1), 178-184 (2015).
  32. M. R. Fathi and D. Almasifar, IEEE Sens. J., 17(18), 6069-6076 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2735304
  33. E. Reyhan, S. YILMAZ, S. YAGMUR and O. T. YAYINTAS, J. Sci. Perspect., 1(2), 19-30 (2017).
  34. K. A. Attia, A. El-Olemy, S. Ramzy, A. H. Abdelazim, M. A. Hasan, M. K. Omar and M. Shahin, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 244, Article 118871 (2021).
  35. Guideline, I. Q2 (R1): validation of analytical procedure: text and methodology. ICH, London 2005.
  36. A. Ayman, A. M. Zeid, M. Wahba and E.-S. Yasser, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 238, Article 118447 (2020).