The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Instructional Ratings by Professors and College Students

교수와 대학생의 수업평가 결과

  • Received : 2021.12.30
  • Accepted : 2022.01.08
  • Published : 2022.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We tested the difference and the relationship in instructional ratings by professors and college students. Subjects were 6 professors and 9 college students participated in teaching competition as a rater. They completed instructional rating forms consisted of 10 criteria for 11 participants according to Lickert Scale. Data were analyzed by independent t-test and Pearson correlation. Results were as follows: ① There was no statistical difference in mean scores between the professor and the student; ② Correlation between professors' and students' evaluations was .78 which is statistically meaningful and high. These results support the notion that students evaluate as reliably as professors. They also imply that pre-service college students can be utilized for teaching practice as meaningful peer evaluators. The findings are meaningful in that instructional ratings of instructors and students were compared in a controlled setting. However, replication studies involving wide range of instructors and students are needed for generalization since the subjects in this study were restricted to pre-service teachers and their instructors.

이 연구는 수업경연대회에 심사자로 참여한 교수 심사자와 대학생 심사자들 간의 평가 결과의 차이와 상관을 검증하였다. 연구대상자는 한 사범대학의 수업경연대회에서 수업시연을 심사한 6명의 교수와 9명의 사범대 학생이었다. 이들은 각 과의 대표로 출전한 학생 11명의 수업시연을 10개 문항으로 구성된 심사평가지에 5단계 척도에 따라 응답하였고, 이 자료를 바탕으로 독립표본 t-검증, Pearson의 상관계수를 구하였다. 그 결과, 교수와 학생 심사자들 간의 평가 점수의 평균에는 통계적으로 의미 있는 차이가 없었다. 교수와 학생 심사자의 평가결과의 상관은 .78로 통계적으로 의미가 있었을 뿐 아니라, 상당히 높았다. 이 결과는 대학생의 수업평가 능력을 지지하며, 수업연습에 동료학생들을 의미 있는 평가자로 활용할 수 있음을 시사한다. 이런 연구는 한 학기라는 오랜 기간 동안의 수업으로 인한 과정변인의 중재를 통제하고, 수업시연만을 대상으로 통제된 환경에서 연구하였다는 점에서 기존연구와 구별되는 의미가 있다. 연구대상자가 사범대에 국한되었다는 것은 제한점이 될 수 있으므로, 일반화를 위해서는 일반대학의 교수와 대학생 연구도 추가할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. J. Kim, "An Analysis on the Educational Needs of College Faculty," Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology(JCCT). Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 239-250, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.2.239
  2. H. W. Marsh, "Student Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research," International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 253-388, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  3. K. S. Han, S.H. Choi, and J. C. Park, "Problems in Mandatory Course Evaluations," Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 35-45, 2011. DOI: 10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.035
  4. R. D. Shingles, "Faculty Rating: Procedures for Interpreting Student Evaluations," American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 459-470, 1977. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162343
  5. K. A. Feldman, "The Significance of Circumstances for the Students' Ratings of Their Teachers and Courses," Research in Higher Education, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 149-172, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976227
  6. J. A. Centra, Reflective Faculty Evaluation, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
  7. H. G. Murray, P. J. Ruston, and S. V. Paunonen, "Teacher Personality Traits and Student Instructional Ratings in Six Types of University Courses," Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 250-261, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.250
  8. M. H. Kim, "Validity and Reliability of Student Ratings of Instruction," Asian Journal of Education, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 1-24, 2005.
  9. Y. S. Kil, "Results of Teaching Evaluation and the Issues," Korean Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 303-323, 2003.
  10. C. A. Cohen, "Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Multisection Validity Studies," Review of Educational Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 281-309, 1981. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051003281
  11. H. G. Murray, "Low Inference Classroom Teaching Behaviors and Student Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness," Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 138-149, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.75.1.138
  12. M. Centoni and A. Maruoti, "Students' Evaluation of Academic Courses: An Exploratory Analysis to an Italian Case Study," Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 70, September, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101054
  13. B. Strumm, "Student Ratings of Instruction: A Summary of the Literature," In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Springer, pp.1-16, 2019.
  14. G. M. Gilmore, M. T. Kane, and R. W. Naccarato, "The Generalizability of Student Ratings of Instruction: Estimation of Teacher and Course Components," Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-13, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00051.x
  15. W. Liu and X. Jin, "The Effect of College Counselors' Authentic Leadership and Ethical Leadership on Students' School Satisfaction," The International Journal Promotion Agency of Culture Technology(JCCT), Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 202-211, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2021.9.3.202