한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제25권6호
  • /
  • Pages.13-24
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

백두대간 속리산 권역 및 한남금북정맥 보은군 권역에 대한 생태계 기능 산정 매트릭스 방법의 적용

Ecosystem Service Matrix applying to Baekdu-daegan Songnisan and Hannamgeumbukjeongmaek Boeun-gun area

  • 김성열 (엔필드(주) ) ;
  • 문건수 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림환경자원학과) ;
  • 김수진 (국립산림과학원 산림생태연구과) ;
  • 권혁수 (국립생태원 생태계서비스팀) ;
  • 최재용 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림환경자원학과)
  • Kim, Sung-Yeol (Enfield Co.) ;
  • Moon, Geon-Soo (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Jin (Division of Forest Ecology, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuksoo (Team of Ecosystem service, Division of Ecological Assessment Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Choi, Jaeyong (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.13
  • 심사 : 2022.12.05
  • 발행 : 2022.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the applicability of Ecosystem Service Matrix method in Songnisan and Hannamgeumbukjeongmaek Boeun-gun area. The assessment was carried out with 25 land cover types by 7 ecosystem values. The research area was divided by 30m x 30m cell unit and the each cell value was classified into 5 grades. The total number of cell under the investigation was 433,910 units in Songnisan and 84,975 in Boeun-gun. Class I and II area were widely spread and Class V area is narrowly distributed inside of Class III area in Songnisan. I area, II area and separately managed zone belong to Ecological Zoning map and Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map(Environment + Ecology) were assessed Class I in Ecosystem service matrix. In conclusion, Ecosystem Service Matrix assessment based on land cover map is a rapid assessment methodology which reflecting ecosystem functions in a larger area. If it is supported with more ecosystem functions, the more precise nature value can be calculated.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국립산림과학원 일반연구과제 '백두대간과 정맥의 산림공간 관리체계화 및 권역별 보전·복원체계 개발'의 지원에 의하여 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Burkhard, B..F. Korll.S. Nedkov and F. Muler. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological indicators 21: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  2. Campagne, C.S..P. Roche.F. Muller and B. Burkhard. 2020. Ten years of ecosystem service matrix: Review of a (r) evolution. One Ecosystem 5: e51103. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103
  3. Choi J.Lee DK.Kim EY and Choi IT. 2008. Feasibility Study on the Introduction of No Net Loss of Green. J. Korean Env. Res and Reveg. Tech. 11(2): 104-113. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Choi J.Lee DK.Kim EY and Lee SH. 2009. A study on the establishment of indicators and standards for the 'No Net Loss of Green'. Incheon: Ministry of Environment. (in Korean)
  5. Choi SM.Kweon HK.Lee JW.Choi YH and Choi TJ. 2014. A Study on Deterioration of Ridge Trail in Jeongmaek. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 28(4): 450-456. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.4.450
  6. Choi TJ.Choi YH.Kang HM and Kim DP. 2015. A Study on the Damage status in the Jeongmaek of South Korea. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 25(2): 106-107. (in Korean)
  7. Costanza, R..R. Arge.R. Groot.S. Farber.M. Grasso.B. Hannon.K. Limburg.S. Naeem.R.V. O'Neill.J. Paruelo.R.G. Raskin.P. Sutton and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological economics 25(1): 3-15.
  8. Davis, B.E. 2001. GIS: A Visual Approach (2nd ed.). Santa F, NewMexico: OnWord Press.
  9. EGIS(Environmental Geographic Information Service). 2021. Environmental Geographic Information Service, Land cover map. Ministry of Environment. https://egis.me.go.kr/ (accessed 11. Aug. 2021)
  10. Groot, R.S..M.A. Wilson and R.M. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41(3): 393-408.
  11. Jacobs, S..B. Burkhard.T. Van Daele.J. Staes and A. Schneiders. 2015. 'The Matrix Reloaded': A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 295: 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024
  12. Jang GS.Jeon SW and Kim SS. 2008. Analyzing Characteristics of Forest Damage within the Geum-buk Mountain Range. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(5): 56-63. (in Korean with English summary)
  13. Jin Y.Jeong S.Jeong S and Lee D. 2015. Assessment on the Forest Conservation Value Considering Forest Ecosystem Services - The case of Gapyung-gun -. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 24(5): 420-431. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.5.420
  14. Jung PM.Kim JI.Yeo I.Joo W and Lee K. 2021. The Selection of Measurement Indicators by Spatial Levels for Ecosystem Services Assessment. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 24(6): 67-87. (in Korean with English summary)
  15. Kang KR and Kim DP. 2012. A Study on the Traditional Geographic System Recognition and Environmental Value Estimate of Hannamkeumbuk-Keumbuk Mountains for the Establishment of Management Plan. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(1): 23-33. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.1.023
  16. Kang KR.Kim DP and Cho W. 2015. The Estimation Research of the Environmental Value of Hannam Jeongmaek Using CVM. Incheon Development Institute Urban Research 9: 9-30. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. KFS(Korea Forest Service). 2015. Synthesis Report on the Second Round Natural Resources Change Survey and Management Practice Study of the Baekdu-daegan Mountains. Daejeon: Korea Forest Service. (in Korean)
  18. KFS(Korea Forest Service). 2022. Forest Policy-Forest Health-Baekdu-Daegan Mountains. http://www.forest.go.kr/ (accessed 4. Jul. 2022)
  19. Kim JW. 2003. Rapid Ecoassessment Technique about Anthropogenic Disturbance Potentiality of Land Use. Korean J. Ecol. 26(1): 19-22. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.1.019
  20. Kim JW.Choi BK.Ryu TB and Lee GY. 2012. Application and Assessment of National Vegetation Naturalness, pp. 81-172. In: Guideline for the 4th national survey for natural environment. National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, Korea. (In Korean)
  21. Kim TS.Hwang SH.Cho KH.Kim SJ and Jang GS. 2020. Evaluating Village-based Resources for Conserving Nakdong-Jeongmaek. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 23(4): 47-58. (in Korean with English summary)
  22. Lee D.Shin JW and Kang S. 2003. Watershed Concept Embedded in The Baekdoodaegan Frame. Korean J. Ecol. 26(4): 215-221. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.4.215
  23. Lee HJ.Kim JW.Nam KB and An JH. 2020. The Survey on Actual Condition Depending on Type of Degraded area and Suggestion for Restoration Species Based on Vegetation Information in the Mt. Jirisan Section of Baekdudaegan. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 34(6): 558-572. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2020.34.6.558
  24. Lee JY.Ahn TM.Kim IH.Kim C.Kim SJ.Chae HS.Lee Y.Lee JW.Kim MW.Shin MJ.Park HI and Cho KJ. 2011. A Study on Participatory Ecological Restoration Procedures-Degreded Ecosystems in BaigDooDaeGhah-. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 14(5): 1-16. (in Korean with English summary)
  25. Lee JY and Lee YB. 2004. Applying the Grid Unit for the Land Suitability Assessment in Korea. Journal of Korea Planning Association 39(7): 97-110. (in Korean with English summary)
  26. Lee MJ and Lee Sj. 2013. A Study ot the Baekcudaegan and Ridgelines Extraction and Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of the Korean Association of Gegraphic Information Studies 16(3): 136-146. (in Korean with English summary)
  27. Lee S.Yun J.Kang D and Cha J. 2020. Planting Status of Ecological Restoration Project and Improvement Plan. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 29(5): 307-322. (in Korean with English summary)
  28. NIE(National Institute of Ecology). 2016. The 4th National Ecosystem Survey. Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean)
  29. NIE. 2020. Pilot Project Research II on the Introduction of the Total Natural Resources Offset System(Impact Mitigation Regulation). Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean)
  30. NIFOS(National Institute of FOrest Science). 2019. 2018 BDMS of Korea Field Survey Report on Forest Resources : Mt. Songni range. Seoul: NIFOES. (in korean)
  31. Park JY.Lee YJ and Chung YK. 2020. Analysis of Development Projects to the Major Mountain Ridges for Environment Assessment. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 28(3): 65-86. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2020.28.3.65
  32. Sagong JH.Jung OS and Yeo HB. 2015. Appraising the Worth of Ecosystem Services of Rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do Region. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning 21(3): 1-17. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.3.001
  33. Shin JH. 2004. Management Area and Management Strategy of Baekdudaegan. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 18(2): 197-204. (in Korean with English summary)
  34. Stoll, S..M. Frenzel.B. Burkhard.M. Adamescu.A. Augustaitis.C. Baessler.F.J. Bonet.M.L. Carranza.C. Cazacu.G.L. Cosor.R. Diaz-Delgado.U. Grandin.P. Haase.H. Hamalainen.R. Loke.J. Muller.A. Stanisci.T. Staszewski and F. Muuller. 2014. Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network. Ecological Modelling 295: 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019