DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics and changes in delivery and puerperium complicaion : Based on the 2006-2017 Korea National Hospital Discharge In-depth Injury Survey

출산 및 산후 합병증 행태의 특성과 변화 분석 : 퇴원손상심층조사자료를 이용하여

  • Kyunghee, Lee (Department of Healthcare Management, Eulji University) ;
  • Jieun, Hwang (College of Health Science, Dankook University)
  • 이경희 (을지대학교 의료경영학과) ;
  • 황지은 (단국대학교 공공.보건과학대학)
  • Received : 2022.10.06
  • Accepted : 2022.10.24
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of delivery and puerperium complications in South Korea and analyze the correlations between the patient's characteristics and delivery and complications before and after 10 years. Methods: This study used the data from an Korean National Hospital Discharge In-depth Injury Survey. Cases of which the principal diagnosis and second diagnoses were disease classification ICD code O00-O99(Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium) were defined as the study subjects, and the first study group was divided as the year of discharge from 2005 to 2007, and the second study group from 2015 to 2017. Results: The number of patients discharged whose principal diagnosis or second diagnoses was O00-O99 was 21,598(Weighted 423,306) from 2005 to 2007 and 19,028(Weighted 364,384) from 2015 to 2017, which decreased by 13.9% compared to 10 years ago. The average age of discharged patients increased by about 2 years and was statistically significant (p<.0001). Factors associating spontaneous delivery, caesarean section and puerperium complication were hospitalization route, bed size, maternal age, length of hospital stay, and the year of discharge. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, health and education policies and economic support for medical care for high-risk pregnancy and delivery management would be necessary continuously. In addition, policies to strengthen the medical system for high-risk pregnancy management in non-metropolitan areas with high fertility rates would also be needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. RS-2022-00165715)

References

  1. 김도균. (2021). 지역별 출산율 변동에 관한 연구: 패널데이터 분석. 한국컴퓨터정보학회 논문지, 26(5):77-86.
  2. 김동식, 김영택, 최인희, 선보영, 최인선. (2013). 고령 임산부의 산전 질환 및 출산결과 동향분석과 정책적 함의. 한국보건사회연구원
  3. 김선숙, 백학영. (2014). 가구의 경제적 수준이 출산행위에 미치는 영향. 한국사회정책, 21(3): 129-57. https://doi.org/10.17000/KSPR.21.3.201409.129
  4. 김순영, 오진호. (2019). 시도별 출산력 예측에 대한 연구. 응용통계연구, 32(2):229-63. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2019.32.2.229
  5. 류양지. (2018). 저출산 정책 방향 및 핵심 과제. 육아정책포럼.
  6. 박미화. (2008). 산부인과 전문병원의 공간 특성. 한국생활환경학회지, 15(1):27-41.
  7. 박인권, 송재민, 윤병석, 박정현, 이한나, 박종서. (2020). 저출산.고령사회 정책개발을 위한 국책연구기관 및 민간기관 협력연구(제 1 부)-지역 인구구조 변화와 삶의 질의 지역 격차에 대한 대응방안. 한국보건사회연구원
  8. 양진영, 박종우. (2020). 여성전문병원 선택요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구. 글로벌경영학회지, 17(4):1-26.
  9. 이삼식, 최효진. (2014). 취업여성의 출산행태와 정책과제. 보건복지부
  10. 이소영. (2016). 산전.산후 관리실태와 정책적 함의. 보건복지포럼, 6:37-50.
  11. 이은지. (2018). 쌍태아 산모의 산후 우울과 건강관리 요구도: 연세대학교
  12. 전광희. (2018). 유럽의 인구동향 및 저출산 대응 가족정책과 한국 인구정책의 과제. 사회과학연구, 29(1):219-37.
  13. 전광희. (2002). 한국의 저출산: 추이와 전망. 사회과학연구, 13:305-23.
  14. 정성호. (2010). 저출산 요인의 인과모형. 사회과학연구, 49(1):69-91.
  15. 정진주. (2008). 제왕절개분만경험 여성이 인식한 제왕절개증가 원인 및 바람직한 출산 환경. 여성건강, 9.1: 57-85.
  16. 태규안, 종윤황. (2016). Maternity care system for high risk pregnant women in obstetrically underserved area. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 59(6):436-42.
  17. 홍석철, 이이. (2016). 저출산 대책의 효과성 평가
  18. 홍성훈, 김윤진, 최형민, 정병준, 전명권, 이응수. (2002). 35 세 이상 고령산모의 임신과 출산의 최근 동향에 관한 임상적 연구. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 45(4):549-53.
  19. 홍성훈, 박재승. (2000). 최근 우리 나라 중소규모 여성전문병원의 건축 계획적 연구. 의료.복지 건축, 한국의료복지시설학회지, 6(10):41-9.
  20. https://kostat.go.kr/wnsearch/search.jsp.
  21. https://www.index.go.kr/main.do
  22. http://www.kdca.go.kr/index.es?sid=a2.
  23. https://kosis.kr/index/index.do.
  24. Choe S-A, Min H-S, Cho S-I. (2016). The income-based disparities in preeclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage: a study of the Korean National Health Insurance cohort data from 2002 to 2013. Springerplus, 5(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1659-2
  25. Ewertz M, Duffy SW, Adami HO, Kvale G, Lund E, Meirik O, et al. (1990). Age at first birth, parity and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 8 studies from the Nordic countries. International journal of cancer, 46(4):597-603. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910460408
  26. Hebert PR, Reed G, Entman SS, Mitchel Jr EF, Berg C, Griffin MR. (1999). Serious maternal morbidity after childbirth: prolonged hospital stays and readmissions. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 94(6):942-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00419-6
  27. Koo Y-J, Ryu H-M, Yang J-H, Lim J-H, Lee J-E, Kim M-Y, et al. (2012). Pregnancy outcomes according to increasing maternal age. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 51(1):60-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.012
  28. Lee S, Jang I, Lee S, Lee C, Shin S, Shin S. (2019). Population change and future social policy. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  29. Lee S-Y, Oh S-Y, Sohn I-S. (2021). Reproductive health rights and indicators. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health, 25(1):1-9.
  30. Lee Y-K, Hong SO, Park S-J, Park M, Wang K, Jo M, et al. ( 2021). Data resource profile: the Korea National Hospital Discharge In-depth Injury Survey. Epidemiology and health, 43.
  31. Marai W, Lakev Z. (2002). Pregnancy outcome in the elderly gravida in Addis Ababa. East African medical journal, 79(1):34-7.
  32. Oh KJ, Hong JS, Youm J, Cho Sh, Jung EY. (2016). Can coagulopathy in post-partum hemorrhage predict maternal morbidity? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 42(11):1509-18.
  33. Park K-m, Moon H, Lee E-s. (2018). Study on the Changes of Prenatal and Labor Characteristics of Married Immigrant Women Referred to a University Hospital for 10 years. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 19(3):317-24. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.3.317
  34. Retherford R, Cho L-J. (1981). Decomposition of the change in the total fertility rate in the Republic of Korea, 1960-1975. Asian and Pacific census forum.
  35. SODERQUIST, Johan; WIJMA, Barbro; WIJMA, Klaas. (2006). The longitudinal course of post-traumatic stress after childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27.2: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820600712172
  36. Youn H, Lee S, Han SW, Kim LY, Lee T-S, Oh M-J, et al. (2017). Obstetric risk factors for depression during the postpartum period in South Korea: a nationwide study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 102:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.003