대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.170-179
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 소아청소년의 저작 능력 평가 및 관련 요인

Masticatory Performance and the Related Factors in Korean Children and Adolescents

  • 이민아 (연세대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이태양 (연세대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김백일 (연세대학교 치과대학 예방치과학교실) ;
  • 송제선 (연세대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Minah, Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Taeyang, Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Baek-il, Kim (Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Je Seon, Song (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.03
  • 심사 : 2022.03.15
  • 발행 : 2022.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 국내 소아청소년의 저작 능력을 평가하고 관련 요인들을 조사하고자 하였다. 유구치의 조기 상실, 제1대구치의 교합 정도, 제1대구치의 교합 관계, 전치부 반대교합의 유무를 고려하였다. 2020년 3월부터 2021년 7월까지 56명의 만 6세에서 12세 사이 소아청소년을 대상으로 하였다. 혼합능력지수(MAI)가 소아청소년의 저작 능력을 평가하기 위해 계산되었고 유구치의 조기 상실 개수에 따라 세 집단으로 분류한 연구대상자는 정상 치열, 유구치 1 - 2개 상실, 유구치 3개 이상 상실한 경우 각각 23명, 18명, 15명이었다. 정상치열군과 1 - 2개 유구치 상실군에서는 MAI 값에서 차이가 없었으나, 3개 이상 유구치를 상실한 경우 MAI 값이 감소했으며, 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다. 이 연구는 국내 소아청소년의 저작 능력을 평가한 최초의 연구로, 성인과 저작 능력을 비교하였으며, 임상에서 소아청소년의 저작 능력 증진을 위해 노력하는 소아치과 의사에게 도움이 될 수 있다.

This study aimed to evaluate the masticatory performance of Korean children and adolescents and to investigate related factors. Early loss of primary molars, degree of occlusion of first molars, occlusal relationship of first molars, and presence of anterior crossbite were considered. From March 2020 to July 2021, 56 children and adolescents between the ages of 6 and 12 were included. The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated to evaluate the masticatory efficiency of children and adolescents. The subjects were classified into three groups according to the number of early lost primary molars; normal dentition, 1 - 2 teeth lost, more than 3 teeth lost. The number of participants are 23, 18, and 15, respectively. There was no difference in the MAI values between the normal dentition group and the group has 1 - 2 teeth lost. However, when 3 or more primary molars were lost, the MAI value decreased and a significant difference was observed. This study is the first study to evaluate the masticatory performance of children and adolescents in Korea, and it will be helpful to pediatric dentists who evaluate the masticatory performance of children and adolescents and strive to improve the masticatory efficiency of children and adolescents in clinical practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahlgren J : Mechanism of mastication. Acta Odontol Scand, 24:1-109, 1966. 
  2. Arvedson JC, Lefton-Greif MA : Anatomy, physiology, and development of feeding. Semin Speech Lang, 17:261-268, 1996.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064103
  3. Prinz JF, Lucas PW : An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals. Proc Biol Sci, 264:1715-1721, 1997.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0238
  4. Carlsson GE : Bite force and chewing efficiency. Front Oral Physiol, 1:265-292, 1974.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000392726
  5. Osterberg T, Tsuga K, Steen B, et al. : Masticatory ability in 80-year-old subjects and its relation to intake of energy, nutrients and food items. Gerodontology, 19:95-101, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00095.x
  6. Papas AS, Palmer CA, DePaola P, et al. : Longitudinal relationships between nutrition and oral health. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 561:124-142, 1989.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb20976.x
  7. Wallace S, Samietz S, Schimmel M, et al. : Impact of prosthodontic rehabilitation on the masticatory performance of partially dentate older patients: can it predict nutritional state? Results from a RCT. J Dent, 68:66-71, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.003
  8. Miura H, Araki Y, Umenai T, et al. : Evaluation of chewing activity in the elderly person. J Oral Rehabil, 25:190-193, 1998.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00237.x
  9. Tada A, Miura H : Systematic review of the association of mastication with food and nutrient intake in the independent elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 59:497-505, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.08.005
  10. Miura H, Miura K, Isogai E, et al. : Chewing ability and quality of life among the elderly residing in a rural community in Japan. J Oral Rehabil, 27:731-734, 2000.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00590.x
  11. Palomares T, Montero J, Rosales JI, et al . : Oral health-related quality of life and masticatory function after conventional prosthetic treatment: A cohort follow-up study. J Prosthet Dent, 119:755-763, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.023
  12. Van der Bilt A, Mojet J, Tekamp F, Abbink J: Comparing masticatory performance and mixing ability. J Oral Rehabil, 37:79-84, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02040.x
  13. Ahn H, Lee Y, Kim B, et al. : Objective and subjective assessment of masticatory function for patients with temporomandibular disorder in Korea. J Oral Rehabil, 38:475-481, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02179.x
  14. Kang S, Lee S, Kwon H, Kim B : Short-term improvement of masticatory function after implant restoration. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 45:205-209, 2015. 
  15. Kim HJ, Lee JY, Kim BI, et al. : Improvements in oral functions of elderly after simple oral exercise. Clin Interv Aging, 14:915-924, 2019.  https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S205236
  16. Sato H, Fueki K, Ohyama T, et al. : A new and simple method for evaluating masticatory function using newly developed artificial test food. J Oral Rehabil, 30:68-73, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01049.x
  17. Jeong S, Kang S, Kim B, et al. : Subjective food intake ability in relation to the Mixing Ability Index in Korean adults. J Oral Rehabil, 37:242-247, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02050.x
  18. Gisel EG : Chewing cycles in 2-to 8-year-old normal children: a developmental profile. Am J Occup Ther, 42:40-46, 1988.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.42.1.40
  19. Schwaab LM, Niman CW, Gisel EG : Comparison of chewing cycles in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old normal children. Am J Occup Ther, 40:40-43, 1986.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.1.40
  20. Schwartz JL, Niman CW, Gisel EG : Chewing cycles in 4-and 5-year-old normal children: an index of eating efficacy. Am J Occup Ther, 38:171-175, 1984.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.38.3.171
  21. Gaviao MBD, Raymundo VG, Rentes AM : Masticatory performance and bite force in children with primary dentition. Braz Oral Res, 21:146-152, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000200009
  22. Kaya MS, Guclu B, Schimmel M, Akyuz S : Two-colour chewing gum mixing ability test for evaluating masticatory performance in children with mixed dentition: validity and reliability study. J Oral Rehabil, 44:827-834, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12548
  23. Leake JL : An index of chewing ability. J Public Health Dent, 50:262-267, 1990.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1990.tb02133.x
  24. Yoon H, Choi Y, Kim K, Chung C : Comparisons of occlusal force according to occlusal relationship, skeletal pattern, age and gender in Koreans. Korean J Orthod, 40:304-313, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.5.304
  25. Toro A, Buschang PH, Throckmorton G, Roldan S : Masticatory performance in children and adolescents with Class I and II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod, 28:112-119, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji080
  26. Ehrlich J, Taicher S : Intercuspal contacts of the natural dentition in centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent, 45:419-421, 1981.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90104-9
  27. Shiere F, Manly R : The effect of the changing dentition on masticatory function. Dent Res J, 31:526-534, 1952.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345520310040301
  28. Tate GS, Throckmorton GS, Ellis III E, Sinn DP : Masticatory performance, muscle activity, and occlusal force in preorthognathic surgery patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 52:476-481, 1994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90344-1
  29. Tate GS, Throckmorton GS, Blackwood DJ, et al. : Estimated masticatory forces in patients before orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 52:130-136, 1994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90393-X
  30. Owens S, Buschang PH, English J, et al. : Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121:602-609, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.122829
  31. Fontijn-Tekamp F, Van Der Bilt A, Abbink J, Bosman F : Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults. Physiol Behav, 83:431-436, 2004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.08.026
  32. Bae J, Son W, Kim Y, et al. : Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion. Korean J Orthod, 47:151-157, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.151