DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of effect of accelerated aging on interim fixed dental materials using digital technologies

  • Omar, Alageel (Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University) ;
  • Omar, Alsadon (Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University) ;
  • Haitham, Almansour (Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University) ;
  • Abdullah, Alshehri (Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University) ;
  • Fares, Alhabbad (Dental University Hospital, King Saud University Medical City) ;
  • Majed, Alsarani (Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University)
  • Received : 2022.08.22
  • Accepted : 2022.11.18
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study assessed the physical and mechanical properties of interim crown materials fabricated using various digital techniques after accelerated aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three groups of interim dental restorative materials (N = 20) were tested. The first group (CO) was fabricated using a conventional manual method. The second group (ML) was prepared from prefabricated resin blocks for the milling method and cut into specimen sizes using a cutting disc. The third group (3D) was additively manufactured using a digital light-processing (DLP) 3D printer. Aging acceleration treatments using toothbrushing and thermocycling simulators were applied to half of the specimens corresponding to three years of usage in the oral environment (N = 10). Surface roughness (Ra), Vickers microhardness, 3-point bending, sorption, and solubility tests were performed. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's multiple comparison test were used to compare the results among the groups. RESULTS. The mean surface roughness (Ra) of the resin after accelerated aging was significantly higher in the CO and ML groups than that before aging, but not in the 3D group. All groups showed reduced hardness after accelerated aging. The flexural strength values were highest in the 3D group, followed by the ML and CO groups after accelerated aging. Accelerated aging significantly reduced water sorption in the ML group. CONCLUSION. According to the tested material and 3D printer type, both 3D-printed and milled interim restoration resins showed higher flexural strength and modulus, and lower surface roughness than those prepared by the conventional method after accelerated aging.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project no. (IFKSURG-2-072). We would also like to extend our gratitude to the Almeswak Digital Laboratory, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for preparing the 3D-printed specimens used in this study.

References

  1. Abdullah AO, Pollington S, Liu Y. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns. Dent Mater J 2018;37:957-63. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-315
  2. Al-Qahtani AS, Tulbah HI, Binhasan M, Abbasi MS, Ahmed N, Shabib S, Farooq I, Aldahian N, Nisar SS, Tanveer SA, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Surface properties of polymer resins fabricated with subtractive and additive manufacturing techniques. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:4077.
  3. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:208-15.
  4. Scotti CK, Velo MMAC, Rizzante FAP, Nascimento TRL, Mondelli RFL, Bombonatti JFS. Physical and surface properties of a 3D-printed composite resin for a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:614.e1-5.
  5. Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT, Ramos V Jr. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:514-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.024
  6. Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. Techniques of fabrication of provisional restoration: an overview. Int J Dent 2011;2011:134659.
  7. Chen H, Cheng DH, Huang SC, Lin YM. Comparison of flexural properties and cytotoxicity of interim materials printed from mono-LCD and DLP 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:703-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.003
  8. Cheng CW, Ye SY, Chien CH, Chen CJ, Papaspyridakos P, Ko CC. Randomized clinical trial of a conventional and a digital workflow for the fabrication of interim crowns: An evaluation of treatment efficiency, fit, and the effect of clinician experience. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.006
  9. Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
  10. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater 2018;34:192-200.
  11. Alageel O. Three-dimensional printing technologies for dental prosthesis: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2022;28:1764-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0164
  12. Kim D, Shim JS, Lee D, Shin SH, Nam NE, Park KH, Shim JS, Kim JE. Effects of post-curing time on the mechanical and color properties of three-dimensional printed crown and bridge materials. Polymers 2020;12:2762. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020276
  13. Simoneti DM, Pereira-Cenci T, Dos Santos MBF. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2022;127:168-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.026
  14. Alageel O, Abdallah MN, Alsheghri A, Song J, Caron E, Tamimi F. Removable partial denture alloys processed by laser-sintering technique. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:1174-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33929
  15. Dikova T, Dzhendov DA, Ivanov D, Bliznakova K. Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes. Arch Mater Sci Eng 2018;94:65-75.
  16. Goiato MC, Zuccolotti BC, Moreno A, Vechiato Filho AJ, Paulini MB, Santos DM. Effect of nanoscale particles incorporation on microhardness of polymers for oral prosthesis. Contemp Clin Dent 2016;7:307-11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.188543
  17. Ho TK, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. The effect of chewing simulation on surface roughness of resin composite when opposed by zirconia ceramic and lithium di-silicate ceramic. Dent Mater 2018;34:e15-24.
  18. Cha HS, Park JM, Kim TH, Lee JH. Wear resistance of 3D-printed denture tooth resin opposing zirconia and metal antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:387-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.004
  19. Nayyer M, Zahid S, Hassan SH, Mian SA, Mehmood S, Khan HA, Kaleem M, Zafar MS, Khan AS. Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials. Eur J Dent 2018;12:57-66. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_380_17
  20. Shahmoradi M, Wan B, Zhang Z, Swain M, Li Q. Mechanical failure of posterior teeth due to caries and occlusal wear- A modelling study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022;125:104942.
  21. Turssi CP, Kelly AB, Hara AT. Toothbrush bristle configuration and brushing load: Effect on the development of simulated non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2019;86:75-80.
  22. Atalay S, Cakmak G, Fonseca M, Schimmel M, Yilmaz B. Effect of thermocycling on the surface properties of CAD-CAM denture base materials after different surface treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021;121:104646.
  23. Yao Q, Morton D, Eckert GJ, Lin WS. The effect of surface treatments on the color stability of CAD-CAM interim fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:248-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.017
  24. Gad MM, Alshehri SZ, Alhamid SA, Albarrak A, Khan SQ, Alshahrani FA, Alqarawi FK. Water sorption, solubility, and translucency of 3D-printed denture base resins. Dent J (Basel) 2022;10:42.
  25. Angwarawong T, Reeponmaha T, Angwaravong O. Influence of thermomechanical aging on marginal gap of CAD-CAM and conventional interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:566.e1-6.