한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디자인씽킹을 활용한 가정교과 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 효과: 중학생의 협력적 문제해결 역량 향상을 중심으로

Development and Effect of Cooperative Consumption Education Program Using Design Thinking in Home Economics Education: Focusing on the Improvement of Cooperative Problem Solving Competency of Middle School Students

  • Kim, Seon Ha (Sanghyun Middle School) ;
  • Park, Mi Jeong (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.30
  • 심사 : 2021.09.23
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 중학교 가정 교과 수업에서 디자인씽킹을 활용한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발하고 실행하여 학생들의 협력적 문제해결역량에 미치는 영향을 알아보는데 있다. 이에 ADDIE 모형에 따라 디자인씽킹에 기반 한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발하고, 총 25명의 학생을 대상으로 실행한 후 평가를 실시하였으며, 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선행연구를 바탕으로 협력적 소비의 실천을 위한 '공유학교 만들기'를 주제로 D. school의 디자인씽킹 프로세스에 기반한 소비교육 프로그램을 개발하였다. 8차시의 교수·학습 과정안과 워크북을 전문가 타당도 검증한 결과, 문항 평균 4.72(5점 만점), CVI 평균 0.93으로 내용 타당도와 현장 적합성이 우수하다고 검증받았다. 둘째, 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 실행하고, 수정·보완된 협력적 문제해결역량 도구를 활용한 사전-사후검사와 개방형 설문조사를 실시한 결과를 종합해볼 때, 학생들이 협력적 소비에 대한 지식과 필요성을 인식하여 실천의식이 향상됨과 함께 개발한 프로그램이 협력적 문제해결역량을 향상시키는 데 유의미한 효과가 있음을 확인하였다. 후속연구로 연구 대상의 확대, 디자인씽킹을 적용한 가정 교과 프로그램 및 소비자 역량 강화를 위한 프로그램 연구, 개발을 제언하였다. 이 연구는 디자인씽킹을 활용한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램이 청소년의 협력적 문제해결역량 향상에 효과가 있음을 확인하였으며, 가정교과에서 변화하는 소비환경에 따른 소비자 교육 변화 요구에 부응하여 '협력적 소비'를 주제로 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement cooperative consumption education programs using design thinking in middle school home economics education classes to understand the impact on students' cooperative problem solving competency. Accordingly, a cooperative consumption education program based on design thinking was developed according to the ADDIE model, and the evaluation was conducted on a total of 25 students. The results of the study were as follows. First, based on prior research, we developed a consumption education program based on D. school's design thinking process under the theme of 'Creating a Shared School' for the practice of cooperative consumption. As a result of expert validity verification of the teaching/learning course plan and workbook for the eight sessions, the average question was 4.72 (out of 5 points) and the average CVI was 0.93, indicating that the content validity and field suitability were excellent. Second, to summarize the results achieved from the implementation of the cooperative consumption education program, the pre-/post-test using the revised and supplemented cooperative problem-solving competency tool, and the open-ended survey, It was confirmed that the developed program had a significant effect on improving not only the students' knowledge and perceived necessity for cooperative consumption along with the awareness of practice, but also the cooperative problem-solving competency. As a follow-up study, we propose to expand the research to a wider audience, and to further conduct research and develop programs applied with design thinking in home economics curriculum and in consumer competency development. This study confirmed that cooperative consumption education programs using design thinking are effective in improving youth's cooperative problem-solving competency and is meaningful in that they developed consumption education programs under the theme of 'cooperative consumption' in response to changing consumer education needs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins.
  2. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Reviews, 86(6), 84-92.
  3. Choi, K. S., & Park, M. S. (2016). The effect of consumer education on knowledge, attitude, intention, motivation, and consumption value for collaborative consumption of undergraduate students. Journal of Consumption Culture, 19(3), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2016.19.3.009
  4. Fehring, R. J. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart & Lung, 16(6), 625-629.
  5. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552
  6. Huh, K., Ryu, S., & Han, S. (2007). An analysis of content of consumer education in middle school based on the 7th curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 3(1), 79-97.
  7. IDEO. (2011). Design thinking for educators. Author: Riverdale.
  8. Jeon, M. Y. (2013). The development and application of ethical clothing consumption education program for "technology home economics" subject in high school. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Jung, J. (2018). Analysis of collaborative consumption intentions and their predictive factors in high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(2), 103-116. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2018.06.30.2.103
  10. Jung, J., & Choi, K. (2017). Effects of high school student' educational experience and expected benefits on the participation intention of collaborative consumption. Family and Environment Research, 55(4), 351-362. doi: 10.6115/fer.2017.026
  11. Kang, B. J., & Choi, M. H. (2013). An exploratory study on the prospect and challenges of the sharing economy. Journal of Policy Development, 13(1), 143-170. https://doi.org/10.35224/kapd.2013.13.1.006
  12. Kim, J.-S. (2014). Analysis on the contents of school consumer education - Focusing on unit of 'adolescents consumption life' in Technology Home Economics textbooks used in the 2009 revised curriculum -. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 23(1), 63-84. doi: 10.5934/kjhe.2014.23.1.63
  13. Kim, M. Y. (2018). Development and effect of design thinking based education program in high school chemistry. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  14. Kim, N. E. (2020). Developing home economics education programs for sustainable development: Focusing on changemaker education with the theme of 'improving consumer life'. Family and Environment Research, 58(3), 279-298. doi: 10.6115/fer.2020.021
  15. Korea Consumer Agency. (2017). 소비자정책 과거, 현재 그리고 미래 [Consumer policy past, present and future]. Chung Buk: Author
  16. Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S.-J. (2015). The suggestion of design thinking process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of elementary-secondary school students in science education. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.3.0443
  17. Lee, H., & Park, Y. (2016). A Study of design thinking process for creative and convergence competency. Art Education Research Review, 30(2), 145-178.
  18. Lee, J. (2019). Effects of design thinking-based education on elementary school students' affective domain development in emotional intelligence and creative personality. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  19. Lee, J.-H. (2011). Effects of school consumer education on adolescents' cellular phone consumption life. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Lee, J. Y., & Yeo, J. S. (2016). Consumer participation and expansion plans of collaborative consumption. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 12(1), 95-118. doi: 10.15790/cope.2016.12.1.095
  21. Lee, J. Y., & Yu, N. S. (2015). The analyses of duplicated contents of 'consumer life' area in technology & home economics and other subject textbooks for middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(4), 121-140. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2015.12.27.4.121
  22. Lee, Y. S. (2010). An analysis on the units of 'adolescence self-management' and 'adolescence consumption life' in technology. Home economics textbooks used in middle schools: Focusing on how the emphasis of the 2007 curriculum revision is reflected. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(3), 55-75.
  23. Lim, Y.-J., & Park, M. J. (2019). A study on the definition of skills and sub-elements of practical art(technology.home economics) in the revised curriculum in 2015. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(1), 141-162 https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2019.32.1.141
  24. Ministry of Education (2015a). The national curriculum for the primary and secondary schools (Notification No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author. Retrieved from http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  25. Ministry of Education (2015b). A practical arts(technology and home economics) / information curriculum (Notification No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author. Retrieved from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  26. Moon, Y.-H. (2013). Toward a critical approach to the study on school consumer educationin schools: an analysis of secondary home economics textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017). PISA 2015 results (volume V): Collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  28. Park, J. (2020). A meta-analysis on the effect of consumer education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  29. Park, M. H., Park, M. S., Je, M. K., Park, M. H., Jung, J. W., & Choi, K. S. (2013). 가치소비시대의 소비자 의사결정 [Consumer values : how they affect consumer decision making]. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  30. Park, M. J. (2018). Effectiveness of consumer education through home economics on middle school students' consumer competency. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(2), 1-20. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2018.06.30.2.1
  31. Park, M. K., & Kim, G. S. (2018). STEAM educational research for developing personality(cultivation of human nature) using design thinking. Journal of Cultural Product & Design, 55, 197-205. doi: 10.18555/kicpd.2018.55.18
  32. Park, M. S., & Oh, S. Y. (2018). Why people participate in collaborative consumption? Analysis of car-sharing 'SOCAR' user's blog using text mining. Journal of Consumption Culture, 21(2), 121-143. doi: 10.17053/jcc.2018.21.2.006
  33. Sim, H.-Y. (2009). Analysis on the effects of consumer education in middle school. Unpublished master's thesis, Sang-myung University, Seoul, Korea.
  34. Sparks, S., & Lien-Gieschen, T. (1994). Modification of the diagnostic content validity model. Nursing Diagnosis, 5, 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.1994.tb00365.x
  35. Woo, Y., & Lee, H. (2018). Development and application of design thinking-based maker education program. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(1), 35-43. doi: 10.32823/jcic.4.1.201804.35
  36. Yoo, J. W. (2016). Development of collaborative problem solving scale in digital age. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 16(7), 185-214.
  37. Yoo, M.-R., & Koo, H.-G. (2018). A study on technology & home economics textbook comparison of middle school according to 2015 revised curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 14(3), 51-84. doi: 10.15790/cope.2018.14.3.051
  38. Yoo, M. S. (2019). Development of clothing upcycling props in middle school home economics using design thinking techniques. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  39. Yoo, S. (2015). 논문작성을 위한 SPSS 실전통계분석 매개효과, 조절효과, 위계적 회귀분석을 중심으로 [SPSS statistical analysis for writing academical papers: Focusing on mediating effects, moderating effects, hierarchical regression analysis]. Seoul: Bullsbook.
  40. Yoon, J., Kwon, J., & Kang, S. (2019) Verification of effectiveness of design thinking-based maker education program for middle school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(10), 561-584. doi: 10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.10.561
  41. Yoon, S. (2020). Analysis of consumer education content presented in home economics and other subjects of middle school based on consumer competency. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  42. Yuk, H. Y. (2016). Design thinking-applied instructional plans for the increased creativity of children. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  43. Yuk, K. M. (2020). Development of teaching-learning materials and analysis of learning experience based on design thinking in home economics curriculum: Focused on the units of sustainable consumption. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(1), 145-165. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.145