디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권10호
  • /
  • Pages.111-118
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성별의 차이에 따른 관계 중심 기부 방법 선호에 관한 연구

Gender Differences in Consumers' Responses to Relationship-Based Giving

  • 투고 : 2021.07.08
  • 심사 : 2021.10.20
  • 발행 : 2021.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

소비자들의 기부에 관한 관심이 증가함에 따라 이에 영향을 미치는 요소들을 연구할 필요성이 증대되고 있다. 본 연구는 기부자의 수가 급증하고 있는 기부 방법 중 하나인 관계를 통한 기부에 영향을 미치는 요소로 성별의 차이를 제안하였다. 연구 1에서는 남성보다 여성이 관계 중심의 기부 광고에 더 호감을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 2에서는 여성 소비자들을 각각 남성성과 여성성을 점화하는 방법을 사용하여 실제 기부 현장에서 용이하게 활용될 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 그 결과 여성성이 점화된 그룹이 남성성이 점화된 그룹보다 관계 중심의 기부 광고에 더 높은 기부 의도와 수혜자와의 상호작용 의도를 보였다. 본 연구는 그 동안 연구되지 않은 주제인 관계 중심의 기부 방법이 성별에 따라 선호도가 다르게 나타났고, 여성의 관계 지향적인 특성이 관계 중심의 기부를 선호하였다는 것을 확인하였다는 점에서 관련 연구자와 마케팅 실무자에게 중요한 의미를 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

As increasing interests in charitable giving, there is also a growing need to examine the factors which influences on consumer's giving behavior. Whereas past research focused mainly on one-time donation, this study examined how gender affects giving behaviors related to social connection with a donee. In Study 1, we found that compared to men, women showed more favorable attitudes toward the relationship based giving. Results from Study 2 revealed that, compared to male-primed women, female-primed women reported more positive giving intention. They are also more interested in interaction with donee. The current research demonstrates that gender differences leads to different responses towards the relationship based giving. Implications of this research for charity solicitation methods are discussed.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by Chungnam National University.

참고문헌

  1. Y. Roh, I Jeong, H Shin & S. Song (2020. 12. 21). Giving Korea 2020, The Beautiful Foundation
  2. World Vision Annual Review. (2020). https://www.worldvision.org/about-us/financial-accountability-2#1468438377863-040c8abd-5609
  3. D. M. Buss & D. P. Schmitt. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
  4. V. Melnyk & S. M. J. van Osselaer. (2012). Make me Special: Gender Differences in Consumers' Responses to Loyalty Programs. Marketing Letters, 23, 545-559. DOI: 10.1007/s11002-011-9160-3
  5. A. H. Eagly & W. Wood. (2012). Social Role Theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458-476). Sage Publications Ltd.
  6. D. Bakan. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion, Rand Mcnally.
  7. A. H. Eagly. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  8. S. T. Fiske, A. J. C. Cuddy, & P. Glick. (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  9. C. Gilligan. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press.
  10. H. Markus, & D. Oyserman. (1989). Gender and Thought: The Role of Self-Concept. In M. Crawford and M. Gentry (Eds) Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives. Springer-Verlag.
  11. E. J. Aries, & F. L. Johnson. (1983). Close Friendship in Adulthood: Conversational Content between Same-sex Friends. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 9(12), 1183-1196. DOI:10.1007/BF00303101
  12. T. Kwang, E. E. Crockett, D. T. Sanchez & W. B. Swann. (2013). Men Seek Social Standing, Women Seek Companionship: Sex Differences in Deriving Self-Worth from Relationships. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1142-1150. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612467466
  13. W. W. Maddux & M. B. Brewer. (2005). Gender Differences in the Relational and Collective Bases for Trust. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 159-171. DOI: 10.1177/1368430205051065
  14. E. A. Doughty & G. R. Leddick. (2007). Gender Differences in The Supervisory Relationship. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory, & Research, 35(2), 17-30. DOI: 10.1080/15566382.2007.12033835
  15. D. You, Y. Maeda & M. J. Bebeau. (2011). Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis, Ethics & Behavior, 21:4, 263-282, DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585591
  16. F. F. Brunel & M. R. Nelson. (2000). Explaining Gendered Responses To "Help-Self" And "Help others" Charity Ad Appeals: The Mediating Role Of World-Views. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, No. 3, 15-28. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2000.10673614
  17. C. T. Chang & Y. K. Lee. (2011). The 'I' of the Beholder: How Gender Differences and Self-Referencing Influence Charity Advertising, International Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 447-478. DOI: 10.2501/IJA-30-3-447-478
  18. W. Simmons & R. Emanuele. (2007). Male-Female Giving Differentials: Are Women More Altruistic? Journal of Economic Studies. 34. 534-550. DOI: 10.1108/01443580710830989.
  19. R. Croson & G. Uri. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 448-74. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
  20. E. Kemp, P. A. Kennett-Hensel & K. Jeremy. (2013). Pulling on the Heartstrings: Examining the Effects of Emotions and Gender in Persuasive Appeals. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 69-79. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2012.749084
  21. C. L. Wang, T. Bristol, J. C. Mowen & G. Chakraborty. (2000). Alternative Modes of Self-Construal: Dimensions of Connectedness-Separateness and Advertising Appeals to the Cultural and Gender-Specific Self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 107-115. DOI:10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_5.
  22. T. M. Ortner & M. Sieverding. (2008). Where are the Gender Differences? Male Priming Boosts Spatial Skills in Women. Sex Roles, 59, 274-;281. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2012.749084
  23. M. Park, Y. Roh, M. Lee, S Yoo, J Yoo, S. Choi & H. Hur. (2021. 02. 09). 2021 Giving Trend, Community Chest of Korea
  24. D. Heo, S. Kim, & D. Shin.(2021). The Effect of Temporal Orientation and Recognizability of Recipients for Presenting Donation Messages, Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(6), 91-101. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2021.19.6.091
  25. M. Suh, & D.Oh. (2018). The Effect of Donations Feedback and Donation Awareness to Donation Continuity Intention, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 129-143. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.129
  26. P. K. Piff, M. W. Kraus, S. Cote, B. H. Cheng & D. Keltner (2015). Having Less, Giving More: The Influence Of Social Class On Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784. DOI: 10.1037/a0020092