Land and Housing Review (토지주택연구)

Land and Housing Research Institute (한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Changes in a Public Management Paradigm and the Implications for Public Enterprises: A Perspective of NPM, NPG, and NPS

공공관리 패러다임의 변화와 공기업에 미치는 시사점: NPM, NPG 그리고 NPS를 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.09.17
  • Accepted : 2021.10.05
  • Published : 2021.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A public management paradigm matters for public enterprises as it has a direct impact on their business management and the performance evaluation on public institutions by the Ministry of Strategy and Finance. This research reviews key theories about public management that has attracted attention since the 1980s: New Public Management (NPM), New Public Governance (NPG), and New Public Service (NPS). These paradigms represent their unique features in terms of efficiency, networks, and public service, and have their own merits and shortcomings. This research asserts that more integrated and multi-dimensional approaches to the public management theories are needed to effectively cope with rapidly changing environments for public enterprises.

공공관리 패러다임은 공기업의 경영관리 및 기재부의 공공기관 경영평가 결과에 직접적인 영향을 미치기 때문에 중요성이 매우 크다. 이러한 차원에서 본 연구는 1980년대 이후 공공관리 이론으로 주목받았던 신공공관리론, 신공공거버넌스론, 신공공서비스론의 주요 이론적 요소에 대해 검토하였다. 분석결과 이러한 공공관리 이론들은 효율성, 네트워크 그리고 공공서비스라는 차원을 각각 대표하고 있으며 나름대로의 장점과 단점을 갖는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 바탕으로 공기업을 둘러싼 환경변화에 적절히 대응하기 위해서는 공공관리에 대한 통합적이고 다차원적인 이해가 필요함을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김대성.이현선(2008), "행정관료의 변형적 역할에 대한 비판: 신공공서비스이론을 중심으로", 「한국정책연구」, 8(1): 21~35.
  2. 김철(2012), "한국 공공기관 지배구조의 민주화 방안: 공공기관운영위원회를 중심으로", 「공공사회연구」, 2(1): 5~42.
  3. 김태룡(2007), 「행정이론」, 서울: 대영문화사.
  4. 나태준(2006), "거버넌스 이론의 세 가지 근원적 질문에 대한 해답가능성의 모색", 「연세행정논총」, 29: 103~127.
  5. 라미경(2009), "거버넌스 연구의 현재적 쟁점", 「한국거버넌스학회보」, 16(3): 91~107.
  6. 라영재.임미화.이주경.서영빈(2018), 「공공기관의 혁신방향과 실천방안」, 한국조세재정연구원.
  7. 배응환(2005), "로컬거버넌스: 갈등에서 협력으로", 「지방행정연구」, 19(2): 187~215.
  8. 우양호(2008), "공공서비스 관리이론의 한국적 적실성에 관한 비교연구: 신공공관리론과 신공공서비스론을 중심으로", 「지방정부연구」, 12(2): 249~273.
  9. 우윤석(2021), 「영화로 보는 행정관람」, 서울: 박영사.
  10. 우윤석(2013), "정부 3.0의 이론적 배경과 해외사례에 관한 연구", 「사회과학논총」, 16: 21~47.
  11. 우윤석(2007), "지역개발사업의 통합적 추진방안: 신공공관리적 접근방법을 중심으로", 「국토연구」, 52: 17~38. https://doi.org/10.15793/KSPR.2007.52..002
  12. 이명석(2006), "제도, 공유재 그리고 거버넌스", 「행정논총」, 44(2): 247~275.
  13. 조성한(2005), "거버넌스에 대한 새로운 이해", 「국가정책연구」, 19(2): 47~68.
  14. 한국행정연구원(2021), 「정부혁신 성과와 개선방향(1): 문재인 정부의 참여혁신 프로그램을 중심으로」, 정부혁신실 정부혁신 1차 포럼 자료.
  15. Alford, J. (1993), "Towards a new public management model: Beyond managerialism and its critics", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 52(2): 135~148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1993.tb00263.x
  16. Bell, S. and A. Hindmoor (2009), Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot and Pat Walsh (1996), Public Management: The New Zealand Model, Auckland: Oxford Univ. Press.
  18. Christensen, T. and P. Laeegried (2012), "Beyond NPM? Some development features", in The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, (eds.) Christensen, T. and Laeegried, P., Aldershot: Ashgate.
  19. Denhardt, R. and J. Denhardt (2003), "The new public service: An approach to reform", Intermational Review of Public Administration, 8(1): 3~10. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013
  20. Denhardt, J. and R. Denhardt (2007), The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
  21. Dickinson, H. (2016), "From new public management to new public governance: The implications for a new public service", in The Three Sector Solution: Delivering Public Policy in Collaboration with Not-For-Profits and Business, (eds.) J. Butcher and D. Gilchrist, 41-60, ANU Press.
  22. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow and J. Tinkler (2006), Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government, London: Oxford Univ. Press.
  23. Frederickson, H. George (1999), "The repositioning of American public administration", Political Science and Politics, 32: 701~711. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500056547
  24. Jessop, B. (2003), "Governance and meta-governance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony", in Governance as Social and Political Communication, (ed.) H. Bang, 101~116, Manchester University Press.
  25. Jessop, B. (2000), Governance Failure, In Stoker, G. (ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  26. Jessop, B. (1999), "The Dynamics of Partnership and Governance Failure", in The New Politics of Local Governance in Britain, (ed.) Stoker, G. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  27. Jouve, B. (2005), "From government to urban governance in Western Europe: A critical analysis", Administration and Development, 25: 285~294. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.385
  28. Kramer, R. M. (1994), "Voluntary agencies and the contract culture: Dream or nightmare?", Social Service Review, 68: 33~60. https://doi.org/10.1086/604032
  29. Osborne, S. P. (2006), "The new public governance?", Public Management Review, 8(3): 377~388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
  30. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  31. Osborne, S. P. (2010), The New Public Governance. London: Routledge.
  32. Robinson, M. (2015), From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service: Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries, UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
  33. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996), "The new governance: Governing without Government", Political Studies, 44: 652~667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  34. Skelcher, C. (2000), "Changing images of the state: Overloaded, Hollowed-out", Congested. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3): 3~19. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670001500302
  35. Sorrentino, M., M. Sicilia and M. Howlett (2018), "Understanding Co-production as a new public governance tool", Policy and Society, 37(3): 277~293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676
  36. Stoker, G. (1998), "Governance as theory-five propositions", International Social Science Journal, 155, UNESCO.
  37. Terry, L. D. (1998), "Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement", Public Administration Review, 58(3): 194~200. https://doi.org/10.2307/976559
  38. Torfing, J. and P. Triantafillou (2013), What's in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System, ECPR General Conference in Bordeaux, 4-7. September, 2013.