DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review on Trunk Impairment Scale for Stroke Patients

  • Lee, Min Joo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Seul (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Konyang University) ;
  • Park, Dae-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2021.08.23
  • Accepted : 2021.09.30
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the trunk impairment scale that are used to assess the trunk control of stroke patients. Design: A systematic review Methods: Stroke subjects were categorized as acute, subacute, chronic. In this systematic review, the studies published between 2000 and 2020 were selected. A literature search using the keywords 'QUADAS', 'stroke', 'trunk impairment scale'. Data sources included RISS, GOOGLE Scholar and DBpia. We assessed the quality of assessment tools using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Results: We reviewed 18 studies. 7 of the 18 studies reported reliability results, 10 reported validity results. The QUADAS tool quality evaluation of 17 literatures extracted except for one randomized control test among 18 literatures showed a range of 3 to 13 points. 5 of the 18 studies are presented with the Cronbach alpha coefficient indicating reliability using internal consistency, all of which are more than 0.8. All studies that presented test-retest reliability, intra-rater reliability, and inter-rater reliability showed high agreement with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.75 or more. Conclusions: A systematic review of the study of the application of the trunk impairment scale for stroke patients will help provide criteria for future studies and application of the trunk impairment scale in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. KATAN, Mira; LUFT, Andreas. Global burden of stroke. In: Seminneurol. GeorgThiemeVerlag. 2018;38.2:208-211. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503
  2. Hariharasudhan, Ravichandran, Janakiraman Balamurugan. Enhancing trunk stability in acute poststroke subjects using physioball exercise and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique: A pilot randomized controlled trial. IntJAdvMedHealthRes. 2016;3.1:5-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/2350-0298.184681
  3. Verheyden G., Nieuwboer A., Mertin J., Preger R., Kiekens C., et al. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinehabil.2004;18.3:326-334.
  4. Tyson S. F., Hanley M., Chillala J., Selley A., Tallis R. C. Balance disability after stroke. Physther. 2006;86.1:30-38.
  5. MANCINI, Martina; HORAK, Fay B. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. EurJPhysRehabilMed. 2010;46.2:239-248.
  6. Verheyden G., Nieuwboer A., Feys H., Thijs V., Vaes K., et al. Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. DisabilRehabil. 2005;27.17:1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500052872
  7. Lanzetta D., Cattaneo D., Pellegatta D., Cardini R. Trunk control in unstable sitting posture during functional activities in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. ArchPhysMedRehabil. 2004;85.2:279-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.004
  8. SANDIN, Karl J.; SMITH, Barry S. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke. 1990;21.1:82-86. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.21.1.82
  9. LOEWEN, Sandy C.; ANDERSON, Brian A. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21.1:78-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.1.78
  10. Harley C., Boyd J. E., Cockburn J., Collin C., Haggard P., et al. Disruption of sitting balance after stroke: influence of spoken output. JNeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77.5:674-676. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.074138
  11. Lombardi B., Orioli A., Casavola D., Paci M. The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties. EurJPhys RehabilMed. 2017;53.4:516-520.
  12. Sag S., Buyukavci R., Sahin F., Sag M. S., Dogu B., et al. Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. NorthClinIstanb. 2019;6.2:156-165.
  13. Naf O. B., Bauer C. M., Zange C., Rast F. M. Validity and variability of center of pressure measures to quantify trunk control in stroke patients during quiet sitting and reaching tasks. GaitPosture. 2020;76:218-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.011
  14. Verheyden G., Vereeck L., Truijen S., Troch M., LaFosse C., et al. Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeurorehabilNeuralRepair. 2009;23.3:281-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308321776
  15. Park J. Y., Chun M. H., Kim Y. M., Kang S. H. Trunk Impairment Scale for Evaluation of Functional Improvement in Acute Stroke Patients. JKorAcad RehabilMed. 2010;34.3:278-284.
  16. JIJIMOL G.; FAYAZ R. K.; VIJESH P. V. Correlation of trunk impairment with balance in patients with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32.2:323-325.
  17. KIM Jung-Hyun; LEE Suk-Min; JEON Seo-Hyun. Correlations among trunk impairment, functional performance, and muscle activity during forward reaching tasks in patients with chronic stroke. JPhysTherSci. 2015;27.9:2955-2958. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2955
  18. Whiting P. F., Rutjes A. W., Westwood M. E., Mallett S., Deeks J. J., et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. AnnInternMed. 2011;155.8:529-536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  19. Whiting P., Rutjes A. W., Reitsma J. B., Bossuyt P. M., Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diag- nostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMCMedResMethodol. 2003;3.1:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-1
  20. Karthikbabu S., John M S., Manikandan N., Bhamini K R., Chakrapani M., et al. Role of trunk rehabilitation on trunk control, balance and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a pre-post design. NeurosciMed. 2011;2:61-67 https://doi.org/10.4236/nm.2011.22009
  21. YU Seong-Hun; PARK Seong-Doo. The effects of core stability strength exercise on muscle activity and trunk impairment scale in stroke patients. JExercRehabil. 2013;9.3:362-367. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.130042
  22. Pathak S., Nayak A., Kedambadi R. C. The relationship between pelvic alignment and trunk control in stroke subjects: a cross-sectional study. IntJResMedSci. 2014;2.4:1483-1487. https://doi.org/10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20141144
  23. Gjelsvik B., Breivik K., Verheyden G., Smedal T., Hofstad H., et al. The Trunk Impairment Scalemodified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34.16:1385-1395. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.645113
  24. Cabanas-Valdes R., Urrutia G., Bagur-Calafat C., Caballero-Gomez F. M., German-Romero A., et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale Version 2.0 (TIS 2.0) to assess dynamic sitting balance and coordination in post-stroke adult patients. TopstrokeRehab. 2016;23.4:225-232.
  25. KO Jooyeon; YOU Youngyoul. Reliability and responsiveness of the Korean version of the trunk impairment scale for stroke patients. JKorPhysTher. 2015;27.4:175-182. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2015.27.4.175
  26. Ko E. J., Chun M. H., Kim D. Y., Yi J. H., Kim W., et al. The additive effects of core muscle strengthening and trunk NMES on trunk balance in stroke patients. AnnRehabilMed. 2016;40.1:142-151. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.142
  27. Verheyden G., Nieuwboer A., De Wit L., Feys H., Schuback B., et al. Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. JNeurolNeurosurgPsychiatry. 2007;78.7:694-698.
  28. SEO Hyun-Du; KIM Nam-Joe; CHUNG Yi-Jung. Reliability of the Korean version of the trunk impairment scale in patients with stroke. PhysTherKor. 2008;15.4:87-96.
  29. HA Sun-Young; SUNG Yun-Hee. Attentional concentration during physiotherapeutic intervention improves gait and trunk control in patients with stroke. NeurosciLett. 2020,736:135291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135291