International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Complementizer That-Deletion in English

  • Kim, Yangsoon (Dept. of English Language and Literature, Hanbat National Univ.)
  • Received : 2021.07.29
  • Accepted : 2021.08.30
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the complementizer that-deletion in embedded complement clauses in English. This paper is concerned with the alternation between the overt that-complementizer and the zero complementizer by the complementizer deletion (C-deletion or that-deletion) in constructions with a nominal complement that-clause, i.e. [VP Verb [CP that-TP]]. In this paper, we compare that-complementation and zero-complementation in a diachronic grammaticalization and corpus, and show that the complementizer that has its origin in pronouns diachronically and finally becomes to form a C-head of the functional category CP. We provide the syntactic and semantic explanation on the optionality of that-deletion while answering the question why and how that-deletion is getting increasing in use especially with the verb, think, in the informal contexts. With the major causes for the currently increasing use of that-deletion, we are concerned with the contexts in which the overt complementizers or the covert complementizers are preferred.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Rissanen. "On the History of that Zero in Object Clause Links in English." In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, London: Longman, pp.272-289, 1991.
  2. S. Thompson & A. Mulac. "The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer That in Conversational English." Journal of Pragmatics 15, pp. 237-251, 1991a. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-M
  3. S. Thompson & A. Mulac. "A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English." In E. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume II, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 313-329, 1991b. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
  4. M. Palander-Collin. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique, 1999.
  5. I. Roberts & A. Roussou. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI:10.1515/BGSL.2007.469
  6. S. Tagliamonte & J. Smith. "No Momentary Fancy! The Zero Complementizer in English Dialects." English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), pp. 289-309, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1360674305001644
  7. R. Torres Cacoullos & J. Walker. "On the Persistence of Grammar in Discourse Formulas: A Variationist Study of That." Linguistics 47, pp.1-43, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.001
  8. D. Kolbe. Complement Clauses in British English. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Trier, 2008.
  9. E. Finegan & D. Biber. "That and Zero Complementizers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650-1990." In B. Aarts & C. Meyer (eds.), The Verb in Contemporary English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-257, 1985.
  10. A. Sorace. "Selective Optionality in Language Development." In L. Cornips and K. Corrigan, (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55-80, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.04sor
  11. Y. Kim. "The English Cause-Focused Causal Construction." IJACT 8.4, pp.161-166, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2020.8.4.161
  12. J. Limber. "The Genesis of Complex Sentences." In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York: Academic Press, pp. 169-185, 1973.
  13. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English, London: Longman, 1972.
  14. J. Grimshaw. "The Best Clitic: Constraint Conflict in Morphosyntax." In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp.169-196, 1997. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5420-84