DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Various Student-Centered Curriculum's Teaching Experiences Focusing on Physical Education

다양한 학생 선택형 교육과정의 체육 교과 지도 경험 비교

  • Cho, Ki-Bum (Division of Sport Science, College of Sport & Art, Hanyang University) ;
  • Moon, Jong-Ho (Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Su (Department of Physical Education, Gyeongin National University of Education)
  • 조기범 (한양대학교 예체능대학 스포츠과학부) ;
  • 문종호 (사우스캐롤라이나대학 심리학과) ;
  • 이희수 (경인교육대학교 체육교육과)
  • Received : 2021.05.28
  • Accepted : 2021.09.20
  • Published : 2021.09.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to suggest qualitative improvement through various student-centered curriculum's teaching experiences focusing on physical education. For this, class diaries, memos, lesson plans, student reviews, and videos for the past four years (2017-2020) were collected and analyzed from four high schools in kyonggi-do, and six students were interviewed. The common features between each student-centered curriculum were to have many students with the purpose of entrance examination and with concern about time conflicts between class and their dinner. In contrast, the differences between each student-centered curriculum were the required level of writing lesson plan, the level of interest and role of a class supervisor, and educational expected effect of students under a given condition. In summary, pre-education experience should be required and class activity support and various evaluation methods should be also needed.

본 연구의 목적은 2017년부터 2020년까지 4년간 지도했던 주문형 강좌, 교육과정 클러스터, 꿈의 대학과 같은 학생 선택형 교육과정의 체육 교과목이 학교 현장에서 어떻게 운영되는지 생태학적 접근을 바탕으로 비교분석함으로써 학생 선택형 교육과정의 질적 향상을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위해 경기도 지역의 고등학교 4곳을 대상으로 지도하면서 획득한 수업 일지, 메모, 강의 계획서, 학생 소감문, 영상물을 바탕으로 6명의 학생 면담을 통해 생태학적 접근 방식으로 분석하였다. 그 결과 각 학생 선택형 교육과정의 공통점으로는 입시 수단으로서 활용하려는 학생들이 많았으며, 저녁식사 시간과 중복된 수업시간에 의해 고민을 갖고 있었다. 차이점으로는 수업 계획의 요구 수준이 달랐으며, 수업 감독자의 관심과 역할이 상이했다. 또한 주어진 수업 조건에 따라 학생들의 교육적 기대 효과가 다르게 나타나고 있었다. 학생 선택형 교육과정의 질적 향상을 위해 수업 개강 전 사전 교육의 중요성에 대한 필요성이 존재하며 또한 수업 지원과 평가 방식의 다양화가 요구된다고 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. B. S. Hong. (2016). Current Diagnosis for Convergence Education and Measures to Improve Convergence Capacity. Korean Journal of General Education, 12(10), 13-35.
  2. K. B. Cho, B. B. Ki & H. J. Lee. (2020). A Self-Study on the Physical Education Teaching Experiences of Student-Centered Curriculum. Educational Research, 77, 75-95. DOI: 10.17253/swueri.2020.77.004
  3. K. W. Lee, K. S. Baek & S. J. Lee. (2017). Key Competencies in the 2015 Revised Curriculum: The Relationship with the Idea of the Educated Person, Educational Goals, and Subject Competencies. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 67-94.
  4. J. J. Ju, W. J. Kim, H. M. Lee, D. B. Lee & S. J. Park. (2017). The Direction for All Grades Credit-Based Elective Curriculum in High School. Suwon: Gyeonggi Institute of Education.
  5. Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2016). 2016 Curriculum Cluster Implementation Manual. Suwon: Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.
  6. N. S. Park. (2016). Is a Tailored High School Curriculum Possible or Not?: A Case Study of a Curriculum Cluster. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 49-69.
  7. Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2019 a). School Curriculum and Press Release. Ministry of Education (Online). https://hischool.go.kr/info/officenes/view.do?nttid=16389#
  8. J. H. Park. (2020). Exploring Gyeonggi Dream Academy in Terms of Achievements and Improvement Strategies. Korean Journal of Education Research, 58(1), 221-244. DOI: 10.30916/KERA.58.1.221
  9. Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2019 b). 2019 Kyeonggi Dream Academy Manual. Kyeonggi Dream Academy(Online). https://udream.goe.go.kr
  10. K. B. Cho. (2018). The Exploration of High School Students' Experiences through the Physical Education Curriculum Cluster as Student-Centered Curriculum. Educational Research, 73, 151-167. DOI: 10.17253/swueri.2018.73.008
  11. K. W. Lee. (2018). Teacher's Perceptions and Needs on Implement of High School Credit System. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(12), 543-567. DOI: 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.12.543
  12. E. J. Lee. (2019). A Narrative Inquiry on the Experience of Operating a Physical Education Curriculum Cluster. Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education, 24(2), 89-104. DOI: 10.15831/JKSSPE.2019.24.2.89
  13. L. J. Kim & K. H. Seo. (2018). Curriculum Reform through High School Credit System. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.36.1.6
  14. T. H. Choi. (2018). Policy Implications for the University of Gyeonggi Dreams in terms of Innovative Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Hummanities, and Sociology, 8(8), 567-575. DOI: 10.21742/AJMAHS.2018.08.57
  15. D. J. Clandinin & M. Connelly. (2004). Knowledge, Narrative and Self-Study in International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_15
  16. R. D. McKenzie. (1924). The Ecological Approach to the Study of the Human Community. American Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 287-301. DOI: 10.4324/9781315087863-2
  17. J. P. Spradley. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. Illinois: Waveland.
  18. H. J. Seo & M. Kim. (2017). Motivation and Characteristics of Participation in College Nighttime Liberal Physical Education. Journal of Wellness, 12(1), 299-308. DOI: 10.21097/ksw.2017.02.12.1.299
  19. S. Y. Chang. (2020). A Study on the Revitalization of University-Linked Education for Regional Development-Focusing on the Case of University of Dreams of Gyeonggi. The Treatise on The Plastic Media, 23(2), 186-194. DOI: 10.35280/KOTPM.2020.23.2.21