Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Results between On-Line and Face-to-Face Classes in 'Calculus' & 'Mathematical Education Theory'

수학교과교육학 및 교과내용학 강좌의 대면 및 비대면 운영 결과 비교 분석

  • Received : 2021.06.29
  • Accepted : 2021.08.03
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explores classes for pre-service mathematics teachers. The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between 'non-face-to-face' classes & 'face-to-face' classes, as well as the differences in learning outcomes between these two methods. A Professors' Learning Group was formed to effectively carry out this study. Through this learning group, we shared how to plan and operate the lecture. The subjects of this study are 'non-face-to-face calculus courses & face-to-face calculus courses' and 'non-face mathematics education theory courses & face-to-face mathematics education theory courses." Specifically, in these two pairs of courses, we analyze the differences in course management and the differences in the outcomes of students' assessments. Non-face-to-face classes were planned, developed, implemented and evaluated based on the 'non-face class design model.' The results of this study are as follows: First, we explored the differences between 'non-face-to-face classes/mixed classes' and 'face-to-face classes.' Second, the achievement results in calculus courses were higher in face-to-face classes than in non-face classes. Third, the results of achievements in mathematics education theory courses were higher in mixed classes than in face-to-face classes. Through the results of this study, we hope that the non-face-to-face class capabilities can be improved in pre-service mathematics teacher training.

본 연구는 예비수학교사 대상의 수학교육론과 미적분학 강좌를 비대면수업으로 진행한 결과와 대면수업으로 진행한 결과 사이의 차가 무엇인지를 살펴보기 위한 목적으로 진행하였다. 본 연구의 대상인 '수학교육론' 및 '미적분학' 강좌의 비대면수업은 '비대면수업 수업설계 모형'에 근거하여 계획, 개발, 실행되고 평가하였다. 본 연구를 통해 수학교과교육학 및 수학교과내용학 강좌운영에서 '비대면수업/혼합수업'과 '대면수업'의 차이가 무엇인지 살펴보았고, 수학교과교육학 과목과 수학교과내용학 과목에 대한 비대면수업에 대한 학생들의 인식을 조사하였으며, '수학교육론' 강좌와 '미적분학' 강좌에서 비대면수업과 대면수업에서 평가결과의 차가 있는지 분석하였다. 향후 예비수학교사교육에서 비대면수업 및 혼합수업 역량이 향상될 수 있는 기회를 제공하고, 지속적인 연구가 수행되길 기대한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 충남대학교 학술연구비에 의해 지원되었음.

References

  1. Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emnergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 1-3.
  2. Chiasson, K., Terras, K., & Smart, K. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 231-240.
  3. Choi, S. K., Ahn, I. J., Noh, Y. H., & Kim, J. S. (2013). A comparative study on curriculum contents and teaching methods based on the syllabi of library and information science in Korea and Foreign Universities. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2). 223-245. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.223
  4. Gillani, B. B. (2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environment. Lanham: University Press of America.
  5. Hur, N. (2015). A study on developing instructional model for flipped learning on pre-service math teachers. Communications of mathematical education, 29(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2015.29.2.197
  6. Jeong, H. H., Roh, S. Z., Jung, J. W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020). The challenge of the spread of covid-19 to education: High quality remote learning for everyone. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 645-669. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.645
  7. Jung, J. Y. (2014). The development of a blended PBL learning model in a smart educational environment. The Journal of Thinking Development, 10(1), 145-162.
  8. Khan, B. H. (2004). E-learning strategies. Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
  9. Kim, J. S., Ryu, S. Y., Byun, H. J., & Seo, Y. K. (2020). Analysis of interaction experience through instructional digital imagination in non-face-to-face synchronous classes. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 873-904. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.873
  10. Kim, J. Y., & Park, J. H. (2020). Text-mining analysis for university instructors' experiences in the transition to online teaching. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 839-871. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.839
  11. Korea Science and Creativity Foundation (2020.8). 2020 Teacher Training College Online Education Capability Enhancement Project Proposal Request. Korea Science and Creativity Foundation Project Proposal.
  12. Lee, J. Y., Sung, E. M., Lee, J. E., Lim, K. Y., & Han, S. Y. (2020). Challenges and tasks facing online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 671-692. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.671
  13. Lee, M. J. (2008). An analysis of the content and improvement strategies of 'educational technology' course In the elementary school teacher education curriculum. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(3), 349-377. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2008.25.3.349
  14. Lee, S. G., Ham, Y. M., & Lee, J. H. (2020). A study on evaluation in college mathematics education in the new normal era. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.4.421
  15. Lee, S. G., Ham, Y. M., Lee, J. H., & Park, K. E. (2020). A case study on college mathematics education in untact DT era. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.3.201
  16. Lee, S. S., & Lee, Y. N. (2007). Development of blended instructional model for creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.2.135
  17. Leem, J. H., Kim, M. H., & Lee, S. H. (2021). Development of an online instructional design model for higher education in the era with COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 281-311.
  18. Ministry of Education (2020a). Management guide for systematic distance class 2019. News Report. Sejong: Author.
  19. Ministry of Education (2020b). Partial revision of the curriculum for elementary and secondary school and special education curriculum (proposal). December 2020 Mathematics and Curriculum Deliberation Materials. Sejong: Author.
  20. Ministry of Education (2021a). Guidelines for 'non-face-to-face classes' and 'face-to-face classes' in the 2021 era of COVID-19. January 2021 Release of response materials from the Ministry of Education. Web search 2021.03.02. Sejong: Author.
  21. Ministry of Education (2021b). The final report of a study on the composition of futureoriented mathematics and curriculum in preparation for post-corona. Sejong: Author.
  22. Moore, M. G., & Thompson, M. M. (1997). The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature. PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education, The Pennsylvania State University.
  23. National Institute of Korean Language (2021.03.02.). Standard Korean Dictionary. from https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do
  24. Nunan, D. (1988). The learner centered curriculum. Cambridge: CUP.
  25. Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  26. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.