참고문헌
- 경찰청 (2017). 진술분석전문가 의견 작성 매뉴얼. 서울: 경찰청.
- 고은영, 채규만 (2011). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 활용 가능성 연구. 한국범죄심리연구, 7, 5-22.
- 김미영 (2016). 진술분석 절차에 관한 연구. 경기대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
- 김현정 (2009). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 신빙성 평가도구의 상대적 유용성 비교. 경기대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
- 김현정 (2010). CBCA와 RM을 이용한 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 신빙성 평가. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 15(3), 355-379.
- 신우종 (2015). 체계적 고찰과 메타분석의 개요. Hanyang Med Review, 35(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.9
- 윤대중 (2019). 통합적 심리증거 수사기법의 효율성에 대한 사례연구. 충남대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
- 윤여훈 (2008). 아동들의 가해.피해 진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 타당성 연구. 강원대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
- 이미선 (2018). 비밀을 이야기 하지 않는 아동의 진술특성: 준거기반내용분석 (CBCA)을 중심으로. 피해자학연구, 26(3), 71-95.
- 이수정 (2010). 아동 성폭력 패해 진술에 대한 신빙성 분석도구들의 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 105- 116. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.2.006
- 이수정, 유진옥 (2010). 지적장애인 성폭력 피해자의 진술 특성에 대한 실증연구. 한국경찰연구, 9(2), 161-184.
- 정의철, 이창호 (2017). 아동학대 사건에 대한 뉴스 프레임 분석과 대안 모색: 평택 아동학대 사건을 중심으로. 한국방송학보, 31(2), 77-108.
- 조은경 (2004). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 타당도 분석 및 활용방안에 관한 연구. 한국형사정책연구원 연구총서.
- 홍성열 (2007). 진술분석기법의 타당성연구. 대검찰청용역연구과제.
- 홍세희 (2013). 메타분석의 이론과 적용. 서울: 에스앤엠 리서치 그룹.
- 황성동 (2014). 알기 쉬운 메타분석의 이해. 서울: 학지사.
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Farina, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and criteria-based content analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Farina, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-Based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
- Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G., & Hofer, E. (2001). Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532501168208
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). An introduction to meta-analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Boychuk, T. (1991). Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
- Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). A field validity study of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
- Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Masip, J., & Blandon-Gitlin, I. (2017). Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of Criteria-based Content Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 819-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000426
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
- Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2), 1-5.
- Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53
- Kohnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler (eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257-82). London: Sage.
- Kohnken, G. (1999). Statement validity assessment. preconference programme of applied courses "Ases ing credibility", organised by the European Asociation of Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland.
- Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the 'detection of the truth'. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41-63). Cambrige, England: Cambrige University Press.
- Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671
- Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Dif erences, 37, 1371-1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.007
- Oberlader, V. A. (2019). Meta-analyses on the validity of verbal tools for credibility assessment (doctoral dissertation). Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn.
- Oberlader, V. A., Naefgen, C., Koppehele-Gossel, J., Quinten, L., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016). Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 440-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000193
- Oberlader, V. A., Quinten, L., Banse, R., Volbert, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Schonbrodt, F. D. (2021). Validity of content-based techniques for credibility assessment: How telling is an extended meta-analysis taking research bias into account?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3776
- Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498980
- Raskin, D. C., Esplin, F. W., & Horowitz, S. (1991). Investigative interviews and assessment of children in sexual abuse cases (Unpublished manuscript). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.(as cited in Oberlader, 2005).
- Roma, P., San Martini, P., Sabatello, U., Tatarelli, R., & Ferracuti, S. (2011). Validity of criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) at trial in free-narrative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.04.004
- Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705-737. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.705
- Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer's emotional style. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(3), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008409802
- Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773-786. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2087
- Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0
- Sporer, S. L., Manzanero, A. L., & Masip, J. (2021). Optimizing CBCA and RM research: recommendations for analyzing and reporting data on content cues to deception. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1757097
- Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In Credibility assessment (pp. 135-154). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Steller, M., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Statement analysis: Credibility assessment of children's testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer.
- Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm, Sweden: Beckmans.
- Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen. Handbuch der psychologie, 11, 26-181.
- Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In Credibility assessment (pp. 101-119). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A Qualitative Review of the First 37 Studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
- Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit; Pitfall and opportunities. John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
- Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3457
- Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and human behavior, 26(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015313120905
- Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8-mentary: Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 168-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- 부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.12.10. 선고 2019 고합141, 2019전고8(병합) 판결.
- 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.01.11. 선고 2018 고합143, 2018전고11(병합) 판결.
- 서울고등법원 2020.01.30. 선고 2019노630, 2019전노44(병합), 2019보노19(병합) 판결.
- 대법원 2020.05.14. 선고 2020도2433 판결.