DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Topology optimization of tie-down structure for transportation of metal cask containing spent nuclear fuel

  • Jeong, Gil-Eon (Radwaste Transportation and Storage Research Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Woo-Seok (Radwaste Transportation and Storage Research Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Cho, Sang Soon (Radwaste Transportation and Storage Research Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2020.10.15
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.07.25

Abstract

Spent nuclear fuel, which can degrade during long-term storage, must be transported intact in normal transport conditions. In this regard, many studies, including those involving Multi-Modal Transportation Test (MMTT) campaigns, have been conducted. In order to transport the spent fuel safely, a tie-down structure for supporting and transporting a cask containing the spent fuel is essential. To ensure its structural integrity, a method for finding an optimum conceptual design for the tie-down structure is presented. An optimized transportation test model of a tie-down structure for the KORAD-21 metal cask is derived based on the proposed optimization approach, and the transportation test model is manufactured by redesigning the optimized model to enable its producibility. The topology optimization approach presented in this paper can be used to obtain optimum conceptual designs of tie-down structures developed in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea. (No. 20171701201750). And this study was partially supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety(KOFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission(NSSC), Republic of Korea(No.1803015).

References

  1. J.A. Wang, H. Wang, H. Jiang, B. Bevard, High burn-up spent nuclear fuel transport reliability investigation, Nucl. Eng. Des. 330 (January) (2018) 497-515, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.02.007.
  2. B. Almomani, D. Jang, S. Lee, Structural integrity of a high-burnup spent fuel rod under drop impact considering pellet-clad interfacial bonding influence, Nucl. Eng. Des. 337 (July) (2018) 324-340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.024.
  3. R.C. Ewing, Long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel, Nat. Mater. 14 (3) (2015) 252-257, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4226.
  4. T. Saegusa, et al., Review and future issues on spent nuclear fuel storage, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 42 (3) (2010) 237-248, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2010.42.3.237.
  5. U. S. NRC, 10 Cfr Part 71, Packaging And Transportation Of Radioactive Material.
  6. U. S. NRC, 10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements For The Independent Storage Of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, And Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.
  7. T.L. Sanders, et al., "A Method for Determining the Spent-Fuel Contribution to Transport Cask Containment Requirements," Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND90-2406, 1992.
  8. P. McConnell, et al., Fuel Assembly Shaker Test for Determining Loads on a PWR Assembly under Surrogate Normal Conditions of Truck Transport, U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development, 2013. SAND2013-5210P Rev. 0.1, FCRD-UFD-2013-000190.
  9. P. McConnell, R. Wauneka, S. Saltzstein, K. Sorenson, Normal Conditions of Transport Truck Test of a Surrogate Fuel Assembly, U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development, U.S. Department of Energy Used Fuel Disposition Campaign, 2014. FCRD-UFD-2014-000066.
  10. H. Adkins, et al., Used Nuclear Fuel Loading and Structural Performance under Normal Conditions of Transport - Demonstration of Approach and Results on Used Fuel Performance Characterization, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, 2013. FCRD-UFD-2013-000325.
  11. P. McConnell, S. Ross, ENSA ENUN 32P Rail-Cask Transport Tests Start June 2017, Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology, 2017. SAND2017-5093PE.
  12. O.T. Ana, et al., ENSA/DOE multi modal transportation tests preliminary results, in: Nei Used Fuel Management Conference, 2018.
  13. E.A. Kalinina, C. Wright, L. Lujan, N. Gordon, S.J. Saltzstein, K.M. Norman, Data Analysis of ENSA/DOE Rail Cask Tests, Sandia National Laboratories, 2018. SFWD-SFWST-2018-000494.
  14. E. Kalinina, "Transportation Test Shaker Table & 30 Cm Drop," EPRI Meeting, November 8, 2018. Charlotte.
  15. N. Klymyshyn, "Modeling and Analysis of SNF Transportation, a Summary," NWTRB Meeting, October 24, 2018. Albuquerque.
  16. W.-S. Choi, J. Lim, J. Lim, Y. Yang, G. Jeong, S. soon Cho, Current status of Korean multi-modal transportation test (MMTT), in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Spring Meeting, 2020.
  17. H.-S. Dho, T.-M. Kim, C.-H. Cho, The evaluation of minimum cooling period for loading of PWR spent nuclear fuel of a dual purpose metal cask, JNFCWT 14 (4) (2016) 411-422.
  18. J.H. Ko, J.H. Park, I.S. Jung, G. Lee, C.Y. Baeg, T.M. Kim, Shielding analysis of dual purpose casks for spent nuclear fuel under normal storage condition, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (2014) 547-556. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.08.2013.039
  19. C.Y. Baeg, C.H. Cho, Development status for commercialization of spent nuclear fuel transportation and dry storage system technology, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol. 16 (2) (2018) 271-279. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2018.16.2.271
  20. IAEA Safety Standards Series No SSR-26, Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2012.
  21. IAEA Safety Standards Series No SSR-6, Regulations on Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material, 2019.
  22. O. Sigmund, K. Maute, Topology optimization approaches, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48 (6) (2013) 1031-1055, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6.
  23. M.P. Bendsoe, O. Sigmund, Topology Optimization-Theory, Methods and Applications, Springer, 2002.
  24. O. Sigmund, On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization, Mech. Struct. Mach. 25 (4) (1997) 493-524, https://doi.org/10.1080/08905459708945415.
  25. M. Bendsoe, Topology Optimization, 2009.
  26. O. Sigmund, A 99 line topology optimization code written in matlab, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 21 (2) (2001) 120-127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050176.
  27. E. Andreassen, A. Clausen, M. Schevenels, B.S. Lazarov, O. Sigmund, Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 43 (1) (2011) 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7.
  28. G.E. Jeong, S.K. Youn, K.C. Park, Topology optimization of deformable bodies with dissimilar interfaces, Comput. Struct. 198 (2018) 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.01.001.
  29. N. Stromberg, Topology optimization of structures with manufacturing and unilateral contact constraints by minimizing an adjustable compliance-volume product, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 42 (3) (2010) 341-350, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0502-1.
  30. N.D. Mankame, G.K. Ananthasuresh, Topology optimization for synthesis of contact-aided compliant mechanisms using regularized contact modeling, Comput. Struct. 82 (15-16) (2004) 1267-1290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.02.024.
  31. W.S. Jang, Current state of spent nuclear fuel storage and trend of material technology, Korea Eval. Inst. Ind. Technol. 14-9 (2014) 40.
  32. O. Sigmund, Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33 (4-5) (2007) 401-424, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x.
  33. A.C.T. Jikai Liu, Andrew T. Gaynor, Shikui Chen, Zhan Kang, Suresh Krishnan, Akihiro Takezawa, Lei Li, Junji Kato, Jinyuan Tang, C. Charlie, L. Wang, Lin Cheng, Xuan Liang, Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57 (2018) 2457-2483, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3.