Journal of Korean Medical classics (대한한의학원전학회지)

The Society of Korean Medical Classics (대한한의학원전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transmission ritual in the Huangdi Neijing : What effect did the form of knowledge transmission have on medicine?

『황제내경(黃帝內經)』의 전승의례(傳承儀禮) : 지식(知識)의 전달형태(傳達形態)가 의학(醫學)에 어떤 영향(影響)을 미쳤는가?

  • Song, Seok Mo (Dep. of Meridian & Acupoint, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University, Cheonjiyeon Korean Medicine Clinic)
  • 송석모 (又石大學校 韓醫科大學 經穴學敎室.천지연한의원)
  • Received : 2021.07.20
  • Accepted : 2021.08.03
  • Published : 2021.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : This paper investigates the significance of the transmission ritual (TR) documented in the Huangdi Neijing (HN) and its effects on medicine pursued by HN's authors (medical bureaucrats). Methods : Descriptions of knowledge transmission and related ritual were identified from HN texts. They were compared with similar types of actions in ancient China, then historically reconstructed. They were also approached from the perspective of ritual studies. Results : It appears highly probable that TR in HN had actually been performed by the authors themselves, which shows characteristics of rites of passage. The participants accepted the in-group order based on patrimonial piety. TR consecrates the participants as well as its object, which is medical knowledge. Conclusions : In the field of TR, the participants shared not only a specific document or knowledge, but also their common experiences of medical perfection and sanctity. They constructed their noble group identity through TR. At the same time, TR inhibited arguments inside the group, in favor of one-way communication.

Keywords

References

  1. 呂鵬志. 天師道登壇告盟儀-「正一法文法箓部儀」考論. 宗敎學硏究. 2. 2011.
  2. 隆奕, 姚茗川. 論中國古代契約制度的發展. 哈爾濱學院學報. 35(5). 2014.
  3. 李模. 先秦盟誓的種類及儀程. 學習與探索. 129(4). 2000.
  4. 馬繼興. 馬王堆古醫書考釋. 長沙. 湖南科學技術出版社. 1992.
  5. 馬珺. 論中國古代的契約制度. 河南省政法管理幹部學院學報. 1999.
  6. 範家偉. 六朝隋唐醫學之傳承與整合. 香港. 中文大學出版社. 2004.
  7. 司馬遷. 裵駰 集解, 司馬貞 索隱, 張守節 正義. 點校本二十四史修訂本 史記 第九冊. 北京. 中華書局. 2014.
  8. 송석모, 이상룡. 「황제내경」의 저자는 누구인가? : 그들의 신분.계급 그리고 정치적 이념. Korean J Acupunct. 34(2). 2017. https://doi.org/10.14406/acu.2017.007
  9. 楊治釗. 古代官場的圈子文化透析. 領導科學. 2015. https://doi.org/10.19572/j.cnki.ldkx.2015.18.010
  10. 閆曉天, 李柱. 談「内經」中的'盟誓'. 河南中醫藥學刊. 16(1). 2001. https://doi.org/10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2001.01.002
  11. 王承文. 從齋戒規範論古代國家祭祀對漢晉道敎的影響-兼論呂鵬志博士一系列論著的商榷. 中山大學學報(社會科學版). 2016. 2.
  12. 李建民. 發現古脈: 中國古典醫學與數術身體觀. 北京. 社會科學文獻出版社. 2007.
  13. 이연승. 중국 고대의 會盟儀禮에 나타나는 歃血에 대하여. 국제중국학연구. 90. 2019.
  14. 이욱. 제사의 종교적 의미에 대한 고찰. 유교사상연구. 16(16). 2002.
  15. 李曉英. 漢代契約硏究. 史學月刊. 12. 2003.
  16. 鄭雯馨. 從祭祀類型談東周的祭祖齋戒日程. 政大中文學報. 27. 2017.
  17. 河北醫學院 校釋. 靈樞經校釋(上.下 2卷). 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1985.
  18. 河北醫學院, 山東中醫學院 校釋. 黃帝內經素問校釋(上.下 2卷). 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1980.
  19. 韓吉紹. 早期丹法傳授儀及其黃金崇拜. 道敎硏究. 1. 2013.
  20. Bell, Catherine. Ritual theory, ritual practice. New York. Oxford university press. 1992.
  21. Bloch, Maurice. Ritual, history and power: selected papers in anthropology. London. Routledge, 2020.
  22. Durkheim, Emile. Karen E. Fields(tr.). The elementary forms of religious life. New York. Free. 1995.
  23. Gennep, Arnold van. Monika B. Vizedom, Gabrielle L. Caffee(tr.). The rites of passage. Chicago. University of chicago press. 2019.
  24. Gluckman, Max. Les rites de passage. Max Gluckman(ed.). Essays on the ritual of social relations. Manchester. Manchester university press. 1962.
  25. Hubert, Henri, and Marcel Mauss. W.D. Halls(tr.). Sacrifice: its nature and functions. Chicago. University of Chicago press. 1981.
  26. Hulsewe, A.F.P. Ch'in and Han law. Michael Loewe, Denis Twitchett(ed.) The Cambridge history of China, Vol. 1, : The Ch'in and Han empires, 221 B.C.-A.D. 220. Kiribati. Cambridge university press. 1986.
  27. Otto, Rudolf. John W. Harvey(tr.). The idea of the holy. Oxford. Oxford university press. 1958.
  28. Propp, Vladimir Yakovlevich. Sibelan Forrester(tr.). The Russian folktale by Vladimir Yakovlevich Propp. Detroit. Wayne state university press. 2012.
  29. Shilling, Chris, and Philip A. Mellor. 'Making things sacred': Re-theorizing the nature and function of sacrifice in modernity. Journal of classical sociology. 13(3). 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13480643
  30. Stewart, Charles. great and little traditions. Alan Barnard, Jonathan Spencer(ed.). Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology. London. Routledge. 2002.
  31. Weber, Max. Gunther Roth, ClausWittich(ed.). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley. University of California press. 1978.
  32. Weber, Max. The social psychology of the world religions. H.H. Gerth, C. Wright Mills(ed.). From Max Weber: essays in sociology. London. Routledge. 20. 2009.
  33. 徐幹. 「中論.譴交」. 中國哲學書電子化計劃. [cited at 10 July, 2021]; Available from: https://ctext.org/zhong-lun/qian-jiao/zh
  34. Faherty, R.L. sacrifice. Encyclopedia Britannica[cited on July 10, 2021]. Available from : https://www.britannica.com/topic/sacrifice-religion