DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Associations Between Compliance With Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and Social-distancing Policies in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Hwang, Yu Seong (Department of Health Policy and Management, Kangwon National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jo, Heui Sug (Department of Health Policy and Management, Kangwon National University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.12
  • 심사 : 2021.05.31
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31

초록

Objectives: This study explored changes in individuals' behavior in response to social distancing (SD) levels and the "no gatherings of more than 5 people" (NGM5) rule in Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Using survey data from the COVID-19 Behavior Tracker, exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 preventive factors: maintenance of personal hygiene, avoiding going out, and avoiding meeting people. Each factor was used as a dependent variable. The chisquare test was used to compare differences in distributions between categorical variables, while binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with high compliance with measures to prevent transmission. Results: In men, all 3 factors were significantly associated with lower compliance. Younger age groups were associated with lower compliance with maintenance of personal hygiene and avoiding meeting people. Employment status was significantly associated with avoiding going out and avoiding meeting people. Residence in the capital area was significantly associated with higher compliance with personal hygiene and avoiding venturing out. Increasing SD levels were associated with personal hygiene, avoiding going out, and avoiding meeting people. The NGM5 policy was not significantly associated with compliance. Conclusions: SD levels, gender, age, employment status, and region had explanatory power for compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). Strengthening social campaigns to inspire voluntary compliance with NPIs, especially focused on men, younger people, full-time workers, and residents of the capital area is recommended. Simultaneously, efforts need to be made to segment SD measures into substrategies with detailed guidance at each level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Worldometer. COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic [cited 2021 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus.
  2. Pearce N, Lawlor DA, Brickley EB. Comparisons between countries are essential for the control of COVID-19. Int J Epidemiol 2020;49(4):1059-1062. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa108
  3. Moradi H, Vaezi A. Lessons learned from Korea: COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41(7):873-874. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.104
  4. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. The state of COVID-19 infection domestic outbreak; 2020 Apr 26 [cited 2021 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501010000&bid=0015 (Korean).
  5. Cowling BJ, Ali ST, Ng TW, Tsang TK, Li JC, Fong MW, et al. Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(5):e279-e288. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30090-6
  6. Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A, Unwin HJ, Mellan TA, Coupland H, et al. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature 2020;584(7820):257-261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7
  7. Imai N, Gaythorpe KA, Abbott S, Bhatia S, van Elsland S, Prem K, et al. Adoption and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19. Wellcome Open Res 2020;5:59. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15808.1
  8. Kim S, Ko Y, Kim YJ, Jung E. The impact of social distancing and public behavior changes on COVID-19 transmission dynamics in the Republic of Korea. PLoS One 2020;15(9):e0238684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238684
  9. Min KD, Kang H, Lee JY, Jeon S, Cho SI. Estimating the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 control in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35(35):e321. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e321
  10. Chudik A, Pesaran MH, Rebucci A. Voluntary and mandatory social distancing: evidence on COVID-19 exposure rates from Chinese provinces and selected countries. Working paper 27039 [cited 2021 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27039.
  11. Lee M, You M. Psychological and behavioral responses in South Korea during the early stages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(9):2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092977
  12. Shiina A, Niitsu T, Kobori O, Idemoto K, Hashimoto T, Sasaki T, et al. Relationship between perception and anxiety about COVID-19 infection and risk behaviors for spreading infection: a national survey in Japan. Brain Behav Immun Health 2020;6:100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100101
  13. Serwaa D, Lamptey E, Appiah AB, Senkyire EK, Ameyaw JK. Knowledge, risk perception and preparedness towards coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak among Ghanaians: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Pan Afr Med J 2020;35(Suppl 2):44.
  14. Jones SP, Imperial College London Big Data Analytical Unit; YouGov Plc. Imperial College London YouGov Covid 19 Behaviour Ttracker Data Hub; 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 3]. Available from: https://github.com/YouGov-Data/covid-19-tracker.
  15. Helliwell JF, Richard Layard R, Jeffrey Sachs J, De Neve JE. World happiness report 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 3]. Available from: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/.
  16. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The state of COVID-19 infection domestic outbreak; 2020 May 5 [cited 2021 May 15]. Available from: http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/tcmBoardView.do?contSeq=354106 (Korean).
  17. Won JS, Ko Y, Park JH, So SH, Choi SH, Lee SK. Key findings of the 2020 Korea Community Health Survey. Public Health Wkly Rep 2021;14(20):1338-1351 (Korean).
  18. Dabla-Norris E, Khan H, Lima F. IMF working papers: what determines social distancing? Evidence from advanced and emerging market economies; 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/05/01/What-Determines-Social-Distancing-Evidence-from-Advancedand-Emerging-Market-Economies-50281.
  19. Chin V, Ioannidis JP, Tanner MA, Cripps S. Effect estimates of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions are non-robust and highly model-dependent. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;136:96-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.014
  20. Ng JH, Tan EK. COVID-19 vaccination and cultural tightness. Psychol Med 2021:1-2.
  21. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, et al. Report 9: impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand; 2020 [cited 2021 Jul 1]. Available from: https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/77482.
  22. Kwon SH. KDCA "Ratio of individual contact pointed the highest rate 46%". Yonhap News; 2021 May 18 [cited 2021 May 19]. Available from: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20210518030100530?input=(Korean).
  23. Nivette A, Ribeaud D, Murray A, Steinhoff A, Bechtiger L, Hepp U, et al. Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: insights from a longitudinal cohort study. Soc Sci Med 2021;268:113370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113370
  24. Onyeukwu PE, Adeniyi A, Amin HJ. Telecommuting: a panacea to COVID-19 spread in Nigerian universities. Int J Innov Econ Dev 2020;6(1):47-60. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.61.2004
  25. Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Educ Res Open 2020;1:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

피인용 문헌

  1. Generic Logic Model for Coronavirus Disease-2019 Responses Based on the South Korean Experience vol.14, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s336425