DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Buttons by Light Curing Using an Extended Optic Fiber

광섬유를 이용한 광중합에 따른 교정용 버튼의 전단결합강도에 관한 연구

  • Yoon, Garam (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jih, Myeongkwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choi, Wonseok (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Sung, Minah (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 윤가람 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상호 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 지명관 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최원석 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 성민아 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2020.09.29
  • Accepted : 2020.11.04
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the shear bond strength of orthodontic buttons according to light tip distance and optic fiber diameter when an extended optic fiber was applied to the tip of a curing light unit. In this study, 315 extracted premolar teeth were divided into 3 groups. Orthodontic buttons were attached using no optic fibers (Group I), 3.0 mm diameter optic fibers (Group II), or 5.0 mm diameter optic fibers (Group III). Each group was divided into subgroups A - C (5.0, 10.0, and 15.0 mm light tip distance), respectively. Shear bond strength was then measured while varying the light tip distance. In group I, shear bond strength significantly decreased as the light tip distance increased. When the shear bond strength was evaluated according to the optic fiber diameter, no statistical significance was observed in group of 5.0 mm light tip distance. Compared with group IB, group IIIB showed significantly greater shear bond strength. Compared with group IC, all groups using 3.0 or 5.0 mm diameter optic fibers showed significantly greater shear bond strength. Therefore, when a curing light unit has poor accessibility, optic fibers with a large diameter should be considered.

이 연구의 목적은 광중합기의 조사단에 광섬유를 적용하였을 때, 조사단과 교정용 버튼의 베이스 사이의 거리와 광섬유 직경에 따른 교정용 버튼의 전단결합강도를 평가하는 것이다. 발치된 소구치 315개를 I, II, III군으로 나누어 광섬유를 사용하지 않거나 3.0, 5.0 mm 직경의 광섬유를 사용하였고 각 군을 A, B, C의 하위군으로 분리하여 5.0, 10.0, 15.0 mm 깊이로 조사단과의 거리를 설정하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 거리 증가에 따라 I군의 전단결합강도가 유의하게 감소하였다. 광섬유 직경에 따른 전단결합강도를 평가했을 때 거리가 5.0 mm인 경우 군 간에 유의성이 관찰되지 않았고 10.0 mm인 경우 IB군에 비해 IIIB군에서 유의하게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였고 15.0 mm인 경우 IC군에 비해 IIC, IIIC군 모두 유의하게 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다. 고로 광중합기의 접근성이 떨어질 때, 광섬유 사용이 추천되며 직경이 큰 광섬유가 성공적인 버튼 부착에 도움이 될 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by research fund from Chosun University Dental Hospital, 2021.

References

  1. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. : Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res, 42: 1490-1502, 1963. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420062701
  2. Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Vissink A, Stegenga B : Eruption disturbances of permanent molars: a review. J Oral Pathol Med, 20:159-166, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1991.tb00913.x
  3. Lee DY, Song SS, Kim SO : Eruption guidance of impacted mandibular first molar. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:226-232, 2010.
  4. Korean Acad Pediatr Dent : Dentistry for the child and adolescent, 5th ed. Dental Wisdom Yenang INC, Seoul, 537-556, 2014.
  5. Frank CA : Treatment options for impacted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 131:623-632, 2000. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0236
  6. Andreasen JO, Petersen JK, Laskin DM: Textbook and color atlas of tooth impaction. 1st ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 65-85, 126-165, 1997.
  7. Yoo JM, Kim JS, Kim YK : Surgical exposure and orthodontic treatment of the impacted first molar. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 23:859-865, 1996.
  8. Johnson WD : Treatment of palatally impacted canine teeth. Am J Orthod, 56:589, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90194-8
  9. Vermette ME, Kokich VG, Kennedy DB : Uncovering labially impacted teeth: apically positioned flap and closed-eruption techniques. Angle Orthod, 1:23-34, 1965.
  10. Lee NY : Eruption guidance for impacted canine. J Korean Dent Assoc, 50:312-321, 2012. https://doi.org/10.22974/JKDA.2012.50.6.002
  11. Jain A, Ray S, Mitra R, Chopra SS : Light Cure Tip Distance and Shear Bond Strength: Does It have any Clinical Significance? J Indian Orthod Soc, 47:135-142, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820130304
  12. Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Proff P, et al. : Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135:422, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.001
  13. Rueggeberg FA, Jordan DM : Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont, 6:364-370, 1993.
  14. Ahn MK, Jeong TS, Kim S : A study on the changes in polymerization of light-activated composite resin with various exposure time and distance. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 28:293-299, 2001.
  15. Andre CB, Nima G, Price RB, et al. : Stability of the light output, oral cavity tip accessibility in posterior region and emission spectrum of light-curing units. Oper Dent, 43:398-407, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-033-L
  16. Kim MS, Kim JS, You SH : A study on the shear bond strengths of visible light-cured glass ionomer cement with several light-curing units. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 34: 81-90, 2007.
  17. Zachrisson BU : A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 71: 173-189, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(77)90394-3
  18. Xie J, Power JM, McGuckin RS : In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under noermal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater, 9:295-299, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  19. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Klersy C, et al. : Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125:357-360, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.022
  20. Lee JH, Kim JS : Effect of different types of bonding agent and application methods on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 44:419-426, 2017.
  21. Oh YJ, Oh SH : Effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength with conventional, moisture insensitive, and self-etching primers. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 46:21-28, 2019.
  22. Pettemerides AP, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ : An in vivo study to compare a plasma arc light and a conventional quartz halogen curing light in orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod, 26:573-577, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.6.573
  23. Kim SO, Choi BJ, Lee JH, Sohn HK : Tensile strengths of pre-ligatured button with several contaminations in direct bonding procedure which can happen during the surgical exposure of unerupted teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 25:400-420, 1998.
  24. Sajnani AK, King NM : Complications associated with the occurrence and treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Singapore Dent J, 35:53-57, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdj.2014.07.001
  25. Kim MS, Kim JS, You SH : A study on the shear bond strengths of visible light-cured glass ionomer cement with several light-curing units. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 34: 81-90, 2019.
  26. Harry FA : Tooth-colored restorations principles and techniques, 9th ed. PMPH-USA, 81-95, 2002.
  27. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Jost-Brickmann PG, et al. : Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of composite resin. Angle Orthod, 75:386-391, 2005.
  28. Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA : The effect of post-cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite. Dent Mater, 16:244-247, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00006-3
  29. Friedman J, Marcus MI : Transillumination of the oral cavity with use of fiber optics. J Am Dent Assoc, 80:801-809, 1970. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0117
  30. Tirtha R, Fan PL, Dennison JB, Powers JM : In vitro depth of cure of photo-activatied composites. J Dent Res, 61:187, 1982.
  31. Phillips RW : Skinner's science of dental materials. 8th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, 230, 1982.
  32. Prati C, Chersoni S, Montebugnoli L, Montanari G. : Effect of the air, dentin and resin-based composite thickness on light intensity reduction. Am J Dent, 12:231-234, 1999.
  33. Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL. : Effect of light power density on development of elastic modulus of a model lightactivated composite during polymerization. J Esthet Restor Dent, 13:121-130, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00434.x
  34. Reynold IR : A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod, 2:171-178, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
  35. James WM : Bond strength of light-cured fluoride releasing base liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100:47-52, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70048-2
  36. Meehan MP, Foley TF, Mamandras AH : A comparison of shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115:125-132, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70338-0
  37. Lalani N, Foley T, Mamandras AH, et al. : Polymerization with the argon laser : curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod, 70:28-33, 2000.
  38. Retief DH : Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface.J Oral Rehabil, 1:265-284, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1974.tb01438.x
  39. Lindberg A, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW : Effect of power density of curing unit, exposure duration, and light guide distance on composite depth of cure. Clin Oral Investig, 9:71-76, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0312-9