디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권7호
  • /
  • Pages.163-174
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중소기업 조직공정성과 IT지원이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 연구 -지식활용 및 탐색 중심으로-

A study on the Effect of Organizational Justice and IT Support of SME on Innovation Behavior -Focusing on Knowledge Exploitation and Exploration-

  • 김성효 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 서영욱 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Kim, Sung Hyo (Department of Business Consulting, Dae Jeon University) ;
  • Seo, Young Wook (Department of Business Consulting, Dae Jeon University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.30
  • 심사 : 2021.07.20
  • 발행 : 2021.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 혁신적인 업무수행을 위한 행동에 영향을 미치는 요인을 찾기 위해 중소기업 직원들이 지각하는 조직공정성과 차별화된 IT지원이 지식활용 및 탐색을 통하여 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 관계를 살펴보고자 하였다. 중소기업 직원들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고, 최종 239부의 설문을 분석하여 SPSS 22.0과 PLS 3.0을 사용하여 연구가설을 검증하였다. 연구결과 조직공정성과 IT지원은 지식활용 및 탐색에 긍정적인 영향으로 나타났고, 지식활용 및 탐색은 혁신행동에 긍정적인 영향을 나타냈다. 본 연구를 통하여 조직공정성이 지식활용 및 지식탐색에 영향을 미치는 이론적 토대를 마련하였고, 중소기업의 혁신행동에 영향을 미치는 조직공정성과 IT지원이라는 두 변수의 종합적인 분석을 통하여 기업의 경쟁력을 높이는 이론적 및 실무적 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 향후 연구에서는 혁신행동으로 인한 성과부분과 관련한 다양한 변수를 활용한 연구가 필요하다.

In order to find the factors that influence behaviors for innovative work performance, this study tried to examine the relationship between organizational justice perceived by SME employees and IT support for differentiation on innovative behavior through knowledge exploitation and exploration. A survey was conducted on employees of SME, and the research hypothesis was verified using SPSS 22.0 and PLS 3.0 by analyzing the final 239 copies. As a result of the study, organizational justice and IT support showed a positive effect on knowledge exploitation and exploration, and knowledge exploitation and exploration had a positive effect on innovation behavior. Through this study, the theoretical foundation for organizational justice to influence knowledge exploitation and main search was established and the theoretical and practical implications for enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise were presented through a comprehensive analysis of the two variables, organizational justice and IT support, which affect the innovation behavior of SMEs. Future research will require to study the performance part due to innovative behavior using various variables.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. T. Akram, S. Lei, M. J. Haider & S. T. Hussain. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129. DOI : 10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001
  2. H. S. Kwon & Y. H. Han. (2020). A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Justice,Organizational Commitment, Customer Orientation, and Innovative Behavior Perceived by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises' Members: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Korean Business Education Review, 35(3), 181-207. DOI : 10.23839/kabe.2020.35.3.181
  3. K. S. Chang & K. Y Ahn. (2015). The Relationship Between Managerial System and Knowledge Management, and the Moderating Effects of Decentralization and Formalization in Small Business. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(6), 167-175 https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.10.6.201512.167
  4. M. Alavi & D. E. Leidner. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 107-136.
  5. P. J. Sher & V. C. Lee. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & Management, 41(8), 933-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.004
  6. J. Benitez, A. Castillo, J. Llorens & J. Braojos. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small US firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1), 131-143. DOI : 10.1016/j.im.2017.09.004
  7. A. Pezeshkan, S. Fainshmidt, A. Nair, M. L. Frazier & E. Markowski. (2016). An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities-performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2950-2956. DOI : 110.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.152
  8. G. Santoro & A. Usai. (2018). Knowledge exploration and ICT knowledge exploitation through human resource management: A study of Italian firms. Management Research Review, 41(6), 701-715. DOI : 10.1108/MRR-07-2017-0215
  9. S. Z. Imamoglu, H. Ince, H. Turkcan & B. Atakay. (2019). The effect of organizational justice and organizational commitment on knowledge sharing and firm performance. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 899-906. DOI : 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.129
  10. Z. Ouyang, J. Sang, P. Li & J. Peng. (2015). Organizational justice and job insecurity as mediators of the effect of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction: A study from China. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 147-152. DOI : 110.1016/j.paid.2014.12.004
  11. J. A. Colquitt, D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. Porter & K. Y. Ng. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
  12. J. R. Kim & H. J. Ham. (2021). The Effect of Organizational Fairness of Social Welfare Officials on Organizational Commitment: Mediating effect of organizational support recognition. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.2.183
  13. T. Akram, S. Lei, M. J. Haider & S. T. Hussain. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129. DOI : 10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001
  14. N. K. Hansen, W. H. Guttel & J. Swart. (2019). HRM in dynamic environments: Exploitative, exploratory, and ambidextrous HR architectures. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 648-679. DOI : 10.1080/09585192.2016.1270985
  15. D. W. Park & K. Y. Kwahk. (2020). The Effects of Information Systems Based Working Environment on the Performance of SMEs. Korean Management Review, 49(1), 215-249. DOI : 10.17287/kmr.2020.49.1.215
  16. N. Wang, H. Liang, W. Zhong, Y. Xue & J. Xiao. (2012). Resource structuring or capability building? An empirical study of the business value of information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 325-367. DOI : 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290211
  17. S. Rivard, L. Raymond & D. Verreault. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 29-50. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.003
  18. G. A. Kim & S. H. Kim. (2016). The Relationship between Organizational IT Capability, and IT Support and Performance : The Moderating Effects of Environmental Dynamics and Management Support. Korean Management Review, 45(5), 1587-1622. DOI : 10.17287/kmr.2016.45.5.1587
  19. N. Rehman, S. Razaq, A. Farooq, N. M. Zohaib & M. Nazri. (2020). Information technology and firm performance: mediation role of absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship in manufacturing SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(9), 1049-1065. DOI : 10.1080/09537325.2020.1740192
  20. C. G. Song & J. Y. Yoon. (2019). A Study of the Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing Performance Focusing on J National University Hospital. Journal of Korean Associastion for Regional Information Society, 22(4), 37-64.
  21. R. V. D. Gonzalez. (2019). Knowledge exploration and exploitation in team context. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(15-16), 1654-1674. DOI : 10.1080/14783363.2017.1400377
  22. S. U. Lee, G. Park & J. Kang. (2018). The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit's structural autonomy on corporate investors' explorative and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 88, 141-149. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.049
  23. D. Lavie, U. Stettner & M. L. Tushman. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155. DOI : 10.5465/19416521003691287
  24. G. J. March. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. DOI : 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  25. M. A. Abebe & A. Angriawan. (2014). Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 339-345. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.015
  26. J. Uotila. (2017). Exploration, exploitation, and variability: Competition for primacy revisited. Strategic Organization, 15(4), 461-480. DOI : 10.1177/1476127017705103
  27. M. M. Crossan & I. Berdrow. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1087-1105. DOI : 10.1002/smj.342
  28. R. V. D. Gonzalez & T. M. de Melo. (2018). The effects of organization context on knowledge exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 215-225. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.025
  29. J. A. Schumpeter. (1939). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. O. Janssen. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. DOI : 10.1348/096317900167038
  31. S. G. Scott & R. A. Bruce. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. DOI : 10.5465/256701
  32. S. A. Shane. (1994). Are champions different from non-champions?. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 397-421. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(94)90014-0
  33. M. J. Kim & N. S. Kim. (2019). A Study on Organizational Culture and Organizational Justice Affecting Innovative Behavior. Korean Review of Corporation Management, 10(1), 199-229. DOI : 10.20434/KRICM.2019.02.10.1.199
  34. S. W. Kim & S. H. Suh. (2018). Study on the Effect of Organizational Justice on Innovative Behavior. Korea Technology Innovaioin Society, 21(3), 1021-1049. DOI : 10.20434/KRICM.2019.02.10.1.199
  35. B. Ibragimova, S. D. Ryan, J. C. Windsor & V. R. Prybutok. (2012). Understanding the Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Informing Science, 15, pp. 183-205. DOI : 10.28945/1694
  36. T. M. Kim. (2015). The Effect of Organizational Justice on the Knowledge Sharing and Utilization in Hotel Firms. Tourism Research, 40(4), 41-59.
  37. S. D. Kang. (2018). Interactive Justice as a Moderated Mediator between Open Communication and Knowledge-sharing Intention. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 18(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22914/JLP.2018.18.1.001
  38. G. M. J. Donate & F. Guadamillas. (2011). Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 890-914. DOI : 10.1108/13673271111179271
  39. R. H. Moorman. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
  40. S. M. Nam, C. G. Hwang, D. S. Kwon & S. G. Hong. (2015). U-complaints call center agents organization fairness impact on job performance through organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of the Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, 11(3), 125-143. DOI : 10.17662/ksdim.2015.11.3.125
  41. Y. E. Spanos & S. Lioukas. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907-934. DOI : 10.1002/smj.174
  42. D. A. Levinthal & J. G. March. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250141009
  43. I. M. Prieto, E. Revilla & B. Rodriguez-Prado. (2009). Managing the knowledge paradox in product development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 157-170. DOI : 10.1108/13673270910962941
  44. G. H. Hwang. (2015). The Impact of Six Sigma, Exploitation and Exploration on Performance. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 43(4), 559-572. DOI : 10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.4.559
  45. H. Kim & K. H. Park. (2015). The impact of collaboration process and capabilities on innovation performance in convergence environment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(5), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.5.151
  46. D. L. Goodhue, W. Lewis & R. Thompson. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?. MIS quarterly, 981-1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703490
  47. W. C. Shin & H. C. Ahn. (2019). Effects of Innovation Characteristics of Cloud Computing Services, Technostress on Innovation Resistance and Acceptance Intention: Focused on Public Sector. The Knowledge Management Society of Korea, 20(2), 59-86. DOI : 10.15813/kmr.2019.20.2.004
  48. W. Chin. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling management. Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  49. M. Y. Um. (2010). A Cross-Cultural Study on Diffusion of Culture-Contents: Focusing on Online Game Contents in Korea and the UK. Korean Management Review, 39(1), 81-106.
  50. H. Liu, W. Ke, K. K. Wei & Z. Hua. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462. DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016