Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Differences in Class Satisfaction of Students Majoring in Beauty by Teaching Methods of Theory and Practice Subjects before and after COVID-19

코로나19(COVID-19) 전·후 이론 및 실습 교과목의 교수방법에 따른 뷰티전공 학생들의 수업만족도 차이 연구

  • 김종란 (오산대학교 뷰티.코스메틱계열)
  • Received : 2021.05.26
  • Accepted : 2021.07.20
  • Published : 2021.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to present effective teaching and learning methods for improving class satisfaction and improving the quality of university education by empirically analyzing changes in class satisfaction according to teaching methods such as face-to-face(FTF) classes, non-face-to-face(NFTF) classes, and blended classes of theories and practical subjects before and after COVID-19, targeting beauty major students who have a relatively higher proportion of practical classes than theoretical classes. For data analysis, SPSS 18.0 statistical package was used, and in the analysis of the difference in satisfaction with teaching methods for theoretical subjects before and after COVID-19, 10 items out of 20 items showed statistically significant differences, and 8 items out of 20 items in the practical subjects showed statistically significant differences. It is expected that the quality of university education will be improved by applying efficient and practical teaching methods considering the items affecting the class satisfaction according to the teaching and learning methods of these theories and practical subjects.

본 연구는 이론수업보다 실습수업의 비중이 상대적으로 높은 뷰티전공 학생들을 대상으로, 코로나19 전·후로 이론 및 실습교과목의 대면수업, 비대면수업, 블렌디드수업과 같은 교수방법에 따른 수업만족도 변화에 대해 실증적으로 분석하여, 수업만족도 제고 방안 및 대학 교육의 질 개선을 위한 효율적인 교수학습방법을 제시하고자 하였다. 자료 분석을 위해 SPSS 18.0 통계 패키지를 활용하였으며, 코로나19 전·후 이론교과목에 대한 교수방법 만족도 차이 분석결과에서는 전체 20개 항목 중 10개 항목이 그리고, 실습교과목에 대해서는 전체 20개 항목 중 8개 항목이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 이론 및 실습교과의 교수방법에 따른 수업만족도에 영향을 미치는 항목을 고려하여 효율적이고 실질적인 교수방법을 적용해 나감으로써 대학 교육의 질 향상을 견인할 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. UNESCO. (2020). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and Beyond. United Nations.
  2. J. H. Shin. (2020). The Meaning and Tasks of Education left by COVID-19. SNUNOW(165)(Online). https://youtube.com/c/kaosscience
  3. S. W. Kim & M. S. Lee. (2018). A Study on e-Learning environment and contents in higher education. Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, 14(3), 103-113. DOI : 10.17662/ksdim.2018.14.3.103.
  4. Y. R. Chung. (2009). A Study of the Effect Factors' Influence on Course Satisfaction in Cyber University. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.25.1.61
  5. B. Y. Kim & S. W. Han, (2020). A Study on Satisfaction with Involuntary University Online Lecture by Corona 19. The Journal of General Education, 13, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.24173/jge.2020.10.13.1
  6. S. C. Lee, S. Y. Kim & S. H. Park. (2020). An early assessment on Korean universities' response to COVID-19: A case of KNU's untact class evaluation. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(20), 993-1019. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.1.993
  7. S. Y. Song & H. K. Kim. (2020). Exploring Factors Influencing College Students' Satisfaction and Persistent Intention to Take Non Face-to-Face Courses during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of Education, 21(4), 1099-1126. DOI : 10.15753/aje.2020.12.21.4.1099
  8. MOHW. (n. d). COVID-19.(Online). http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/
  9. T. H. Kim & W. M. Kim. (2005). A Study on the Learning Model for Efficient Culinary Practice. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research 11(1), 1-17.
  10. H. J. Jeon & H. S. Kang. (2014). In Search of the Limitations of Schwab's practical curriculum and Its Possibility of Narrative as alternative. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 169-191.
  11. J. H. Son & H. S. Kim. (2020). A Survey Study on Face-to-face & Non-face-to-face Classes for Students Majoring in Radiology. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology, 43(6), 511-518. DOI : 10.17946/JRST.2020.43.6.511
  12. N. Emelyanova & E. Voronina. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students' and teachers' perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 272-289.
  13. S. Y. Park. (2020). A Study on the Efficient Design Education Program through Non-face-to-face Online Practical Classes. Master's Thesis. Pukyong National University, Busan.
  14. D. J. Lee & M. S. Kim. (2020). University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 359-377. DOI : 10.15702/mall.2020.23.3.359
  15. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Curriculum(Online).https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1%EA%B3%BC%EC%A0%95
  16. S. J. Mok. (2015). A study on the operation of convergence-based English subjects using flipped learning methodology - centered around screen English, SNS English and TED English. Korean Journal of General Education, 9(3), 193-214.
  17. K. H. Kim. (2020). Study on the Effects and Limitations of Blended Learning-based College Lectures in Online Courses. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(5), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2020.14.5.239
  18. M. Discoll, (2002). Blended Learning, e-learning, 3(3), 54-56.
  19. J. S. Park. (2015). Mediating Effect of Acceptance in Relationship between University Life Stress and Satisfaction with Life. The Korean Journal Of Stress Research, 23(1), 1-8. DOI : 10.17547/kjsr.2015.23.1.1
  20. Y. M. Baek. (2017). The Moderating Effects of Flow on the Relationship between Stress and Satisfaction with life, University life Satisfaction. Korea Academy Industrial Cooperation Society, 18(5), 490-496. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.5.490
  21. E. G. Yoon. (2018). A Study on the Variables Affecting the Evaluation of Lectures : Focusing on Liberal Arts Education. Korean Journal of General Education, 12(5), 185-210.
  22. C. J. Song. (2014). A Study on the Teaching and Learning Activities, Student-teacher Communication, and Course Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Education, 15(2), URI : 171-200. https://hdl.handle.net/10371/92560 https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2014.15.2.007
  23. N. I. kim. (2020). A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-face-to-face Online Class -Focused on K University. Asia Culture Academy of Incorporated Association, 11(5), 1145-1158. DOI : 10.22143/HSS21.11.5.8
  24. J. S. Choi & M. K. Kwon & E. K. Choi. (2020). A Study on Learner Perceptions and Satisfaction Levels of Real-Time Online Learning. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture. 17(2), 247-277. DOI : 10.15652/ink.2020.17.2.247.