DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy Evaluation of Disinfectant for Reducing Bioaerosols Generated in a Meat Processing Workplace

육가공 작업장에서 발생되는 바이오에어로졸 저감을 위한 살균제 효능 실증 평가

  • Hwang, Ju-Young (Department of Safety Engineering at the Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Choi, Won (Department of Safety Engineering at the Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Doo-Young (Department of Safety Engineering at the Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • An, Woo-Ju (Department of Safety Engineering at the Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Je (Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul national University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Youn (Department of Safety Engineering at the Graduate School of Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 황주영 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 안전공학과) ;
  • 최원 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 안전공학과) ;
  • 김두영 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 안전공학과) ;
  • 안우주 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 안전공학과) ;
  • 이우제 (서울과학기술대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • 김기연 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 안전공학과)
  • Received : 2021.05.07
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare and evaluate the reduction efficiency of disinfectants used in the domestic meat processing industry to reduce bioaerosol exposure of meat industry workers and to use this as basic data for establishing work environment management measures. Methods: Thirteen disinfectants sold in South Korea were selected for evaluation and the bacterial reduction effect of the disinfectants was investigated. Bacterial suspension and surface disinfection tests were conducted to compare and analyze the antibacterial strength of the disinfectants. Pork carcasses, cutting boards, benches, and conveyor belts were selected for surface sterilization tests. Results: As a result of the bacterial suspension experiment test, all disinfectants had a bacterial reduction efficiency of more than 86%. Among them, the bacterial reduction efficiency of chlorine disinfectants was 99.93% on average. In the results of the pork carcass surface sterilization test, the rate of reduction of disinfectants made of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) was the highest. Tests of plastic cutting boards showed that chlorine disinfectants had the best sterilization effect. Experiments on stainless steel benches showed the best bacterial reduction efficiency for chlorine dioxide and QACs disinfectants. In the conveyor belt made of urethane, QACs disinfectants showed excellent sterilization effects. Conclusions: The study evaluated the disinfection power of disinfectants against bacteria occurring in domestic meat processing plants. All disinfectants were found to be effective in bacterial suspension experiments, and chlorine disinfectants were particularly effective. In surface sterilization experiments, sterilizing agents with QACs as the main ingredient were excellent.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 결과물은 농림축산식품부의 재원으로 농림기술기획평가원의 농생명산업기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었음(과제번호 : 319115-02-2-SB010)

References

  1. Brandi H, Fricker-Feer C, Ziegler D, Mandal J, Stephan R, Lehner A. Distribution and identification of culturable airborne microorganisms in a Swiss milk processing facility. Journal of dairy science 2014; 97(1):240-246.(https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7028)
  2. Fagerlund A, Moretro T, Heit E, Briandet R, Langsrud S. Cleaning and disinfection of biofilms composed of Listeria monocytogenes and background microbiota from meat processing surfaces. Applied and environmental microbiology 2017;83(17) (http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01046-17)
  3. Frank JF, Chmielewski RA. Effectiveness of sanitation with quaternary ammonium compound or chlorine on stainless steel and other domestic food-preparation surfaces. Journal of Food Protection 1997;60(1):43-47.(https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-60.1.43)
  4. Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Joo DA, Stan MA, Chan CS, Allan ND, Vrionis HA, Olson ME, Ceri H. Copper and quaternary ammonium cations exert synergistic bactericidal and antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008; 52(8):2870-2881. (http://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00203-08)
  5. Jericho KWF, Ho J, Kozub GC. Aerobiology of a high-line speed cattle abattoir. Journal of food protection 2000;63(11):1523-1528.(https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.11.1523)
  6. Jessen B, Lammert L.. Biofilm and disinfection in meat processing plants. International biodeterioration & biodegradation 2003;51(4):265-269. (https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0964-8305(03)00046-5)
  7. Lues JFR, Theron MM, Venter P, Rasephei MHR. Microbial composition in bioaerosols of a highthroughput chicken-slaughtering facility. Poultry science 2007;86(1):142-149.(https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.1.142)
  8. Shale K, Lues JFR, Venter P, Buys EM. The distribution of staphylococci in bioaerosols from red-meat abattoirs. Journal of Environmental Health 2006;69(4):25-32.
  9. Shale K, Lues JFR. The etiology of bioaerosols in food environments. Food Reviews International 2007;23(1):73-90.(https://doi.org/10.1080/87559120600998205)
  10. Shilenge LB, Shale K, Matodzi T, Machete F, Tshelane C. A review of microbial hazards associated with meat processing in butcheries. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 2017;9(1):1-6. (https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1219485)
  11. Sutton GHC. Enumeration of total airborne bacteria, yeast and mold contaminants and identification of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Listeria spp., Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. in a beef and pork slaughter facility. University of Florida,; 2004.
  12. Theisinger SM, Smidt OD, S. Bioaerosols in the Food and Beverage Industry. Ideas and applications toward sample preparation for food and beverage analysis.; 2017. p. 51(http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69978)
  13. Wirtanen G, Salo S, Maukonen J, Bredholt S, Mattila-Sandholm T. Sanitation in dairies. VTT PUBLICATIONS.; 1997.
  14. Wirtanen G, Salo S, Helander IM, Mattila-Sandholm T. Microbiological methods for testing disinfectant efficiency on Pseudomonas biofilm. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2001;20(1):37-50. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(00)00173-9)