Journal of KIBIM (한국BIM학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling (한국BIM학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of New Urbanism Urban Design Factors in New Town -Case Study on Eunpyung New Town District 1 in Seoul -

국내신도시 사례를 통해서 본 뉴어바니즘 도시설계요소 분석 -서울시 은평뉴타운 1구역을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2021.02.18
  • Accepted : 2021.03.26
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The design principles of new urbanism (NU) have been adopted for new towns-in town projects for inner city neighborhoods in Seoul, Korea Since 2000. Here, ten NU principles were matched to four urban design categories: streets, land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. These elements were analyzed for Eunpyung New Town project. Through the case, the applications and implications NU principles are explored. The principles of connectivity, quality architecture and urban design, increased density, green transportation, sustainability, and quality of life were positively and successively adopted for streets, land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. The principles of mixed-use and diversity and traditional neighborhood structure were only partially applied in land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. It should be note that the walkability principle is intended not for job-housing proximity, but for pedestrian-friendly street design.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 인천대학교 2016년도 자체연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Andersen, B. (2001). The Quest for Community: A study of Kentlands, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  2. Bressi, W. T. (1994). Planning the American Dream, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
  3. Burns, C. (1997). Urban or Suburban. Harvard Design Magazine, 1, pp. 46-61.
  4. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis, Princeton Architectural Press: NY, USA.
  5. Calthorpe, P. (1994). The Region. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
  6. Charles C. T., Mark J. E. (1999). Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands, Real Estate Economics, 27(3), pp. 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00779
  7. Crane, R. (1996). Cars and Drivers in the New Suburabs: Linking Access to Travel in Neotraditional Planning Journal of American Planning Association, 62(1), pp. 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975670
  8. Crane, R. (1996). On Form vs. Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, of Increase It?, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, pp. 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9601500204
  9. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E. (1991). Towns and Town-Making Principles, Harvard Graduate School of Design. Rizzoli: NY, USA.
  10. Ellin, N. (1996). Postmodern Urbanism, Blackwell Publishers: MA, USA.
  11. Ewing, R. H. (1994). Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review, Environmental and Urban Studies, 21(2), pp. 1-15.
  12. Fainstein, S. (2000). New Directions in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), pp. 451-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500401
  13. Flemming, D. (1998). The Space of Argument: Urban Design, Civic Discourse, and the Dream of the Good City. Argumentation, 12, pp. 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007735612744
  14. Ford, L. R. (1999). Lynch Revisited: New Urbanism and Theories of Good City Form. Cities, 16(4), pp. 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00023-2
  15. Fulton, W. (1996). The New Urbanism: Hope or Hype for American Communities? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge: MA, USA.
  16. Gordon, P., Richardson, W. (1996). Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990 Journal of American Planning Association, 62(3), pp. 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975695
  17. Hall, K., Porterfield, G. (2001). Community by Design. McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
  18. Harvey, D. (1997). The New Urbanism and the Communitarian Trap. Harvard Design Magazine, 1, pp. 68-69.
  19. Katz, P. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
  20. Kayden, J. (2005). What's the Mission of Harvard's Urban Planning Program?, Harvard Design Magazine, 22, pp. 1-4.
  21. Kim, H. S. (2006). Is New Urbanism Modern or Postmodern?. Journal of Korean Urban Management Association, 19(2), pp. 49-74.
  22. Kim, H. S. (2006). Reality of New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands, the U.S.A. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 51, pp. 109-130.
  23. Kim, H. S. (2007). Applicability of New Urbanism to Korea: Survey of Residents of the Seoul Metropolitan Area, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 55, pp. 155-178. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2007.55.4.009
  24. Kim, J. (2001). Sense of Community in Neotraditional and Conventional suburban development, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
  25. Lee C. M., Ahn, K. H. (2003). Is Kentlands better than Radburn? Journal of American Planning Association, 69(1), pp. 50-71 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976293
  26. Moule, E., Polyzoides S. (1994). The street, the Block, and the Building, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
  27. Newman, P. W. G., Kenworthy, J. R. (1988). The Transport Energy Trade-Off: Fuel Efficient Traffic vs Fuel Efficient Cities. Transportation Research Record, 22(3), pp. 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(88)90034-9
  28. Oranje, M. (2002). Planning and the postmodern Turn, Planning futures, New Directions for Planning Theory Routledge: London, UK.
  29. Park, J. H., Lee, J. R. (2012). A Study on the Possibility to Apply the Characteristics of New Urbanism and Our Country in a New City Business Seen from the Point of View of Modernism and Post-modernism, Journal of the Korean Digital Architecture Interior Association, 12(4), pp. 107-116.
  30. Park, Y. C., Ryu, J. S. (2000). Prospects and Limitations of Urban Design Prototypes in New Urbanism. Journal of Architectural Institution of Korea, 139, pp. 77-86.
  31. Talen, E. (1999). Sense of Community and Neighborhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies, 36(8), pp. 1361-1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993033
  32. Woodhull, J. (1992). Sustainable Cities: How Alternative Forms of Development Can Reduce Traffic Congestion, EHM Eco-Home Media: CA, USA.
  33. Principles of New Urbanism. Available online: http://newurbanism.org(Accessed on 5 Dec 2020)