DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Characteristics of Scientific Observation of Gifted Middle-School Students in Rock Identification

암석 판별 탐구에서 중학교 영재들의 과학적 관찰의 특징 탐색

  • Received : 2021.05.30
  • Accepted : 2021.06.30
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the characteristics of scientific observation and reasoning of gifted middle-school students in rock identification. Five rock samples that are considered important as per science textbooks, including igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks, were provided to 19 first-year middle-school students attending a gifted education center. Students were asked to infer the formation process, type, and name of each rock. The results showed that the characteristics of rocks that students primarily paid attention to included color, texture, and structure. Students immediately succeeded in identifying common rocks based on memory; however, meaningful inferences were not made. In case of rocks that students faced difficulty discriminating, significant reasoning processes were revealed through discourse. In addition, although scientific reasoning was properly constructed based on meaningful observations, there were cases wherein rock identification failed. These results will contribute to determining the current level of understanding of middle-school students in rock identification activities and finding ways to provide students with meaningful scientific observation and inference experiences through rock identification in the school field.

본 연구의 목적은 암석 판별 탐구에서 중학교 영재학생들의 과학적 관찰과 추론의 특징을 탐색하기 위함이었다. 이를 위하여 영재교육원에 다니는 19명의 중학교 1학년 학생들에게 과학 교과서에서 중요하게 다루는 화성암, 변성암, 퇴적암이 포함된 5가지 암석 샘플을 나누어 주고 각 암석의 형성과정, 종류, 이름 등을 유추해 보도록 하였다. 연구 결과, 학생들이 주로 주목하는 암석의 특징은 색, 조직, 구조로 나타났다. 전형적인 암석의 경우 기억에 의존하여 즉각적으로 암석 판별에 성공하나 관찰에 근거한 유의미한 추론이 이루어지지 못하는 반면, 판별에 어려움을 겪는 암석의 경우 관찰에 근거한 유의미한 추론 과정이 담화를 통해 드러나기도 하였다. 또한 유의미한 관찰 결과로부터 과학적 추론을 타당하게 구성하였으나 암석 판별에 실패한 경우도 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 중학생들의 암석 판별 탐구 활동에서 학생들의 현 수준을 파악하고, 학교 현장에서 이루어지는 암석 판별 탐구가 학생들에게 과학적 관찰과 추론의 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 방안을 모색하고, 시사점을 제공하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blumenfeld, P., Kempler, T., and Krajcik, J. 2005. Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In K. R., Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488).
  2. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Cho, K. 2011. Petrological Investigation of the Specimens in School Rock Gardens in Jeonju, Korea. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(1), 113-123. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.1.113
  3. Crawford, B. 2014. From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Ledermann & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2) (pp. 515-541). New York, NY: Routledge.
  4. Engelhardt, W. and Zimmermann, J. 1982. Theory of earth science (translated by L. Fisher). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Ford, D. 2005. The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders' descriptions of rock and mineral properties. Science Education, 89(2), 276-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20049
  6. Ford, M. 2008. 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17, 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
  7. Froyland, M., Remmen, K. and Sorvik, G. 2016. Name-Dropping or Understanding?: Teaching to Observe Geologically. Science Education, 100(5), 923-951. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21232
  8. Guffey, S., Slater, T., and Slater, S. 2017. Development of the EGGS exam of geology stan?dards to measure students' understanding of common geology concepts. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 4(1), 25-61.
  9. Han, S., Choi, S., and Noh, T. 2012. Epistemological views of middle school students on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 82-94. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.1.082
  10. Jung, C. and Shin, D. 2020. Changes of the Abductive Inquiry Performance in Outdoor Geological Fieldwork. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 41(5), 531-554. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2020.41.5.531
  11. Kwon, Y., and Kim, J. 2012. The Problems and Improvements of Rock Specimens used for Science Education in Elementary Schools. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 33(1), 83-94. (in Korean)
  12. Lee, C., Ryu, C., and Cho, J. 2011. The International Comparative Study on the Origin of the Terms of Mineral and Rock. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(3), 305-323. (in Korean)
  13. Lee, S. 2001. A study interest and understadnings of middle school students on rock and mineral. Master Thesis, Chonnam National Univetsity, Chonnam, Korea. (in Korean)
  14. Millar R. 2004. The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science, High school science laboratories: role and vision, Washington DC, USA: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 1-24.
  15. Ministry of Education. 2015. 2015 Revised Curriculum. Science 2015-74. MOE, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  16. Moon, B., 2013 The study of the characteristics and the properties of the granite observing results in the elementary students' scientific inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(2), 101-111. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2013.6.2.101
  17. Mupira, P., and Ramnarain, U. 2018. The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21440
  18. National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  19. Oh, P. 2020a. Analyzing Rock Descriptors Used by Elementary School Students in Different Task Contexts. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 41(1), 61-74. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2020.41.1.61
  20. Oh, P. 2020b. A Critical Review of the Skill-Based Approach to Scientific Inquiry in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 141-150. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.141
  21. Oh, P. and Kim, C. 2005. A theoretical studies on abduction as an inquiry method in Earth science. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(5), 610-623. (in Korean)
  22. Park, K. 2005. Elementary school student's interest and understanding of rocks. Master Thesis, Gyeongin National Univetsity of Education, Incheon, Korea. (in Korean)
  23. Park, K. and Cho, K. 2014. The Classification Ability with Naked Eyes According to the Understanding Level about Rocks of Pre-service Science Teachers. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 35(6), 467-483. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2014.35.6.467
  24. Pellegrino, J., and Hilton, M. 2012. Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  25. Remmen, K. and Froyland, M. 2020. Students' use of observation in geology: towards 'scientific observation' in rock classification., International Journal of Science Education. 42(1), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1704914
  26. Schwartz, R., and Lederman, N. 2008. What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
  27. van Schijndel, T., Jansen, B., and Raijmakers, M. 2018. Do individual differences in children's curiosity relate to their inquiry-based learning? International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 996-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460772
  28. Watson, R., Swain, J., and McRobbie, C. 2004. Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of science education, 26(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072764
  29. Wee, S, and Choi, J. 2002. High school students' interest on minerals and rocks. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 23(8), 625-631. (in Korean)
  30. Wee, S., Cho, H., Kim, J. and Kim, Y. 2007. Characteristics of high school students' conceptual understanding about minerals and rocks. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(4), 415-430. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.4.415
  31. Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. 2005. Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd Ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  32. Wu, P., Kuo, C., Wu, H., Jen, T., and Hsu, Y. 2018. Learning benefits of secondary school students' inquiry-related curiosity: A cross-grade comparison of the relationships among learning experiences, curiosity, engagement, and inquiry abilities. Science Education, 102(5), 917-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21456
  33. Yu, E., Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H., Ryu, K., and Lee, D. 2021. International Research Trends Related to Inquiry in Science Education: Perception and Perspective on Inquiry, Support and Strategy for Inquiry, and Teacher Expertise for Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(1), 33-46, (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.1.33